this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
90 points (82.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This was true for TVs until it wasn't.

Edit: apparently some young whippersnappers don't know TVs used to be mono before they were stereo, and now some TVs even have spatial sound.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already.

no one really cares that much about audio on phone calls. as long as they're understandable.

people added video because it adds to the communication. spatial audio will not. it will only become common if one or two of these mega corps decide to shoehorn it into ever device. not because people actually want it or care.

might be a lucrative patent if we ever get holograms though

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

… You realize this has been innovated because someone cares, right?

Like this is such a silly argument. “Why would we make cars not use steam? If people cared about it we would have already innovated!”

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

it's not that it shouldn't be done, I'm just predicting it's going to flop.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already

so you are saying that all the innovation and research should be stopped, because if we care about any specific problem, it is already solved, and if it isn't, it is proof we don't care? 😆

that... is not how it works.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it shouldn't be done, I'm just predicting it's going to flop.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

yeah, because in the world of audio/video content, who would care about quality of sound, right?

and even if people would actually not care, it still doesn't mean that someone won't be able to sell it to them.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

You think we haul 30" phones around in the foreseeable future?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You don't need the tv for the surround sound, the speakers fit inside tiny devices you can put near each ear.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

You can stream your video call to a TV right now, and spatial sound could help match the movement of the people on screen if the phone was stationary for a more immersive call.

No need to haul anything around, just some creative thinking.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

No, clearly we walk around with full 5.1 surround sound speakers on poles.