this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
564 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new bill to make it easier to authenticate and detect artificial intelligence-generated content and protect journalists and artists from having their work gobbled up by AI models without their permission.

The Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act) would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create standards and guidelines that help prove the origin of content and detect synthetic content, like through watermarking. It also directs the agency to create security measures to prevent tampering and requires AI tools for creative or journalistic content to let users attach information about their origin and prohibit that information from being removed. Under the bill, such content also could not be used to train AI models.

Content owners, including broadcasters, artists, and newspapers, could sue companies they believe used their materials without permission or tampered with authentication markers. State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission could also enforce the bill, which its backers say prohibits anyone from “removing, disabling, or tampering with content provenance information” outside of an exception for some security research purposes.

(A copy of the bill is in he article, here is the important part imo:

Prohibits the use of “covered content” (digital representations of copyrighted works) with content provenance to either train an AI- /algorithm-based system or create synthetic content without the express, informed consent and adherence to the terms of use of such content, including compensation)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If this passes, this would have the perverse effect of making China (and maybe to a lesser extent the Middle East) the leading suppliers of open source / open weight AI models...

[–] Melt@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

China would be the world leader in making AI model trained on copyrighted content

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

And as the vast majority of content is not licensed for AI model training, they would have an immensely larger dataset to train on.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well, there is also Europe ✌🏻

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

No. In the EU, the lobbyists have already won. Major countries, like Germany, have always had very conservative copyright laws. I believe it's one reason why their cultures are losing so hard.

Surprisingly, Japan has adopted a very sensible law on AI training.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I am just sitting here with my eye twitching thinking of all the code I have had to deal with from German companies over the years.