this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
291 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 98 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You could have, you know, not bought and ruined oculus, and destroyed the VR ecosystem.

I was at GDC the year of the acquisition. There were Facebook suits walking around the showroom floor writing checks to sign exclusivity deals with anyone showing off a VR game.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 53 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That is a way more legit reason to still be mad, in my book, and it predates the Facebook acquisition. Oculus had made all that noise about how their devices would be platform agnostic and they wouldn't try to railroad you into buying games through their platform and the moment there was money buzz around the idea Luckey dropped that stuff like it was red hot and we ended up with the travesty that is the PC Oculus store.

I don't think VR was ever going to be mainstream, but imagine what the software ecosystem would be if techbro Smeagol hadn't gotten greedy for that precious, precious investment money.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At least we have some pretty amazing hardware with a decent variety to choose from.

Yeah, I wish more quality content was made for VR, but it's still pretty mind blowing even with what we have.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah, well, don't tell the local patrons, I'm in like post a hundred below of "how dare you acknowledge anything remotely serviceably about a Meta-related product".

But yeah, no, you're pretty much right. They're subsidizing a huge chunk of that entire corner of tech. I don't think it's a mainstream type of device, but I'm glad we all got to spend a few years messing with it as a semi-viable consumer product, even if it's just a bit of an overengineered novelty thing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Facebook flooded the market with cash, but failed to secure any Killer App to get people on their product. I wouldn't say they ruined Oculus so much as it continues to be an unsolved technology that wasn't ready for this level of exposure. I still can't use the damned thing for more than an hour without feeling nauseous, and Meta was trying to gear up Oculus headsets for mass adoption by office workers.

The games market isn't what they're fixated on. They want this to be standard hardware for excel-book jockeys.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I suspect that we'll end up not with the gaming market being where this sticks, but entertainment. Imagine an immersive movie with 360 views.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Imagine an immersive movie with 360 views.

My neck is already hurting from craning all the time. And I'm guaranteed to miss the best part of the movie because I was looking in the wrong direction.

[–] TunaLobster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Moto X (2013) has a 360 demo movie on it. It was alright and neat to spin around in your chair to follow the action, but at the same time I could have sat still and the camera moved.

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

My crippling adhd would like a word