this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1151 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 200 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Internet shutoffs shouldn't be a thing, outside of non-payment or legitimate abuse. If I do something illegal, they should have to sue me, not shut off my internet.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 102 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, they don't disconnect a criminals phone service because they committed a crime and made a phone call. It makes no damned sense.

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Only happens as a matter by court order and is a limit on the person not on the corporations. Though if found out after by the court it can be ordered terminated. And you will face further punishment. But this is levied against the person. As in "You are not allowed to do a thing and if we find out you did the thing you will face further punishments." Corporations should not have the responsibility or ability to determine any ones eligibility. They are a businesses not a government.They are responsible for their own tos and should never be anything more.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

government.They are responsible for their own tos

Piracy almost certainly violates their TOS

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

Actually, that's been done several times over the decades. As well as banning computer access. The guy caught hacking into the fbi gets his mouse and keyboard taken away.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you do something illegal, you should be arrested.

Copyright infringement lawsuits are a far cry from bomb threats or the like.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not everything that is illegal is punishable by arrest

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I've been ticketed for speeding, and that certainly doesn't come with the threat of arrest unless I'm driving super recklessly or something (but that's a different offense altogether).

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So you're saying copyright infringement is on par with speeding or parking past the meter's end? Eh, fair enough.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago

Honestly it is less severe than speeding. Copyright was an invention of the pre-digital era. Now that we all use computers, so many things we do every day are technically copyright infringement that it is absurd to even have these kinds of conversations.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was just pointing out a logical fallacy. It's literally impossible to do the thing you said.

This is just facts, they aren't an opinion

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] oconnordaniel@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago

Maybe not a court order. But I could get behind a process similar to other utilities where you have months or warning and paperwork.