this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
255 points (93.5% liked)

Games

16806 readers
832 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The mods that updated for the first update were already updated within 24 hours of the next one.

The only mods that are still broken now are mods that were made and maintained by people who have stopped playing the game some time ago.

And even most of those still work, if they didn't rely on the script extender

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 64 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

The game is a decade old. I get the feeling that most mods will never be updated.

Downvoters should go check out the Stellaris mod graveyard. So many good mods gone forever.

[–] icesentry@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn, you're right, it's almost been a decade already. I honestly thought it was younger than that.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't like thinking about that, lol. Skyrim being 13 really makes me feel old

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sure but that still leaves a lot of unnecessarily broken mods. I don't know how backwards compatible a lot of the main mods are but doesn't this risk forcing players to either upgrade and uninstall some old mods, downgrade and uninstall some new/updated mods, or downgrade and play the guessing game of which versions of which mods are compatible where? And after the backlash of the first update Bethesda went ahead and did it again so clearly they don't care about steamrolling modders' work and they might do it again. Modders going to give up eventually and go back to New Vegas lol

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

The mods that weren't backwards compatible were primarily the ones that depended on the script extender. This was an unsupported executable that expanded on the commands available to the scripts in the mods.

Not to say unsupported is bad, but everyone was well aware that if they depended on the script extender, they would break if the game updated at all. The biggest mods avoided that dependency for exactly this reason, and really didn't have any trouble. (Sim Settlements still worked the entire time, for example)

And like usual, the community stepped up and updated their unsupported extension quickly, ready for this outcome.

If you made a mod that depends on the script extender and then quit playing the game or supporting your mod, that was a choice you made as a modder. Meanwhile there's mods that haven't seen an update in 8 years that continue to work without issue.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

People act like mods breaking after an update is new. Bethesda (and every other dev team) has been doing it since Morrowind (and long before that) The MWSE and everything else were fine back then, too.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, the issue is that the updates fix nothing of value and break mods in this decade old game. Passable update for console, “why did you even try?” on pc.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They add plenty of value, people just haven't really read into it. I.e. widescreen support, performance optimization, etc.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You mean things that mods had fixed almost a decade ago?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, but let's be real - modding isn't for everyone. The show was a mainstream hit, so a lot of eyes were on the game again. Adding native improvements like that are a benefit to the game overall and to the people who don't know how to mod or care enough to do it. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. But at the end of the day, hooking to a binary is just a hotfix away from being broken till someone fixes it again.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Minecraft updates break mods all the time but there it is just something the community accepts as normal and lives with. The huge update rage is something I only see with Bethesda game modding.

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Because Bethesda games are exclusively single player and offer absolutely no way to decline updates. If they had the old version available as a "beta" or (even better) if Valve stopped dying on the "every game must be updated before launching it even single player games because fuck you" hill there wouldn't be any outrage.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No way to decline update

Turn automatic updating off for the game in question in Steam, and then set the download rate for Steam to 0 so it can't update when you start up the game.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So you say that you want the gog.com version of the game then?

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Without having to re-buy the game, yes. I'd even be willing to pay GOG a bit of money for the cost of hosting the files etc, but I'm not paying Bethesda twice. That's just rewarding bad behaviour.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People have whined about this for twenty years. Yawn

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Then perhaps it is an issue that should be remedied?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Right, that's really more of a Steam issue than a Bethesda issue. I get why Valve and Bethesda don't want to provide customer support for old versions, but they don't have to. People have been figuring out their own problems when using obsolete systems or software for a long time.

I have no issue with Steam pushing the updates and encouraging you to take them, but giving no way to decline is a pretty poor user experience. Especially when we already know they keep old versions on their servers, as people have made guides on how to downgrade with Steam

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes...core game updates typically do break mods. This is nothing new

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 months ago (11 children)

It's mostly about the timing that is infuriating people. Fallout regained popularity with the TV show and they dropped a mod breaking release days later. Now they keep updating it with shit nobody asked for and breaking mods.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Ahh I see. Timing is key. Thx

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope all the newbies already learned to turn off auto updates

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago

Graham Wagner even reminisced about a bug he came across while playing The Elder Scrolls 2: Daggerfall, stating that adding 'glitches' into a then-hypothetical second season of the show was "definitely on [his] mind as a concept".

Now I'm seriously hoping there's a scene in season 2 where a character walks into a room and every object on every surface just sorta freaks out and clatters around, a la the traditional Bethesda physics engine insanity.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Really need those clicks, huh Eurogamer?

They're really making an article about mods breaking when the game is updated, an event that nearly always happens when any game is updated. Incredible.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Controversy drives engagement

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Turd_Ferg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I read the headline and thought "well yea, no shit. Thats what happens". It must be a slow news day (you can only report the "new" release date for gta so many times).

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I mean it's working. Have you read some of the entitled bullshit people are posting in the comments?

[–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh, I was just thinking and I don't think I've seen it mentioned. Have these updates broken the creation club mods?

[–] shani66@ani.social 6 points 6 months ago

I believe creation club dlc does keep working, feel free to assume the worst.

[–] Captain@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Why even share this? (Or more accurately why even make this article) Everyone knows every update will break mods, nobody is surprised and nobody needs to read an article about it Everytime a moldable Bethesda game updates.

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, we know. And its always a shit update too, nothing worth breaking mods for. Just break steam updates and move on.

load more comments
view more: next ›