this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
61 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

76564 readers
2814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dexahtm@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I thought it was nice that maybe a private browser would be mainstream but then on second thought.... Something icky must be going on if it's mainstream, i mean the whole crypto part was an instant warning for me. Proud Librewolf user over here!!!

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2069436850145993

50 States, 50 Protests, 1day

Feb 5 @ your downtown.

[–] Darioirad@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

But how can i replace the built in function of youtube playing music on mobile in the background? Please give me an alternative

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tengkuizdihar@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Vivaldi? Trusting a closed sourced application for privacy? What?

Not even defending brave here, just weird that the author say that.

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago
[–] batman654987@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 9 months ago

This is bulshit, i dont decide will i use a browser depending on who works on it, but depending on the browser itself.

So insted of looking at browser itself this dude sugests we should look at people that work on it and asume the browser is bad if someone working on it is bad which is blindfolded deciding and its nonsense.

So if you have malicios intent and dont have to say anything bad about the browser itself concretly and tehnical because if you lie there, many people that know how it is will say no it doesnt work that way here how it is than you just trash people that are working on it whic is wery hard to veryfi is it trye or not. And probably it isnt..

So when we discus open source software there is no need to talk about writers of the code much because we can discus the code itself and tell concretly if something is bad. Exactly which line and why its bad.

Anything else is just made up and malicios.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've been trying out the DuckDuckGo browser lately on mobile. It uses the Chromium backend, so some sites work better in it than in my normal Firefox.

The neatest feature of the browser is the ability to generate random email addresses in signup forms, and those emails all get forwarded to your real email address. As it forwards the emails, it removes trackers from them. You can click a link in one of the forwarded emails to disable that address from being forwarded any more if it gets spammy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrPloppy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] v9CYKjLeia10dZpz88iU@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

deleted by creator

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›