this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
506 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Snapchat is reserving the right to put its users’ faces in ads, according to terms of service related to its “My Selfie” tool (formerly “AI Selfies”), which allows users and their friends to create AI-generated images trained on their selfies.

Users have the option to opt out of this by toggling off a “feature” in the app called “See My Selfie in Ads,” but according to 404 Media’s testing this feature is on by default.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 105 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 102 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Snapchat hereby has the right to suck my ass.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

*Snapchat reserves the right to use your ass in AI ads

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Ur gonna regret that harder than the poor souls making up the HumanCentiPad

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Snapchat the next Day:

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

they know that the type of people who use snapchat of all fucking things either don't give a shit, or are too ignorant to see it as an issue. if they ever read about this at all. at the end of the day, they know that not enough people will ditch the platform to make any difference

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

For anyone that has friends that can be convinced to move off snapchat:

  • it doesn't actually delete things after the timer goes out, it just hides it from view. Sometimes the app bugs out and that data will be accessible again
  • signal has stories and the same format of disappearing messages
  • everything else that's good about signal

If what they want is the "One weird trick your doctor is hiding from you" style content on the discover page, then I got nothing.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'd say the same for Tiktok users. But that's the popular platform, so it's unpopular to criticize it.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I really did think that a Chinese social media company would never stand a chance here. I run into 80 year old farmers who ask me, “Did you see ‘at feller on TikTok who does ‘at thang with the tractor?”

That same person will go on and on about China. People are neat.

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 30 points 2 months ago

No. Just no. Not even going to highlight anything from this article.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's why I deleted my account. May Snapchat rest in piss.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I cannot, I have had it for over a decade at this rate I think and my number associated is old now and I can't log into to the website to delete. I can log into the app and use it but cannot delete it.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't think of a way for this to be legal in the EU by any capacity. I really don't. They're essentially claiming they own your likeness just by using their app and I really doubt it's that simple. It's kind of like asking for your first born in a readme.txt of a github script. Just because you write something ridiculous doesn't mean it's legal.

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 13 points 2 months ago

No, but they’ll try because the citizens aren’t rebelling against it yet.

[–] Louisoix@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

LoL good luck with my fucked up face!

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Archive link

https://archive.ph/uHqsT

Raw:

Snapchat is reserving the right to put its users’ faces in ads, according to terms of service related to its “My Selfie” tool (formerly “AI Selfies”), which allows users and their friends to create AI-generated images trained on their selfies. Users have the option to opt out of this by toggling off a “feature” in the app called “See My Selfie in Ads,” but according to 404 Media’s testing this feature is on by default.

“My Selfie is used to power Generative AI, Cameos and other experiences on Snapchat that feature you, including ads,” a pop up in the Snapchat app says. “My Selfie uses your images and information to do this.”

A support page on the Snapchat website titled “What is My Selfie?” explains further: “You’ll take selfies with your Snap camera or select images from your camera roll. These images will be used to understand what you look like to enable you, Snap and your friends to generate novel images of you. If you’re uploading images from the camera roll, only add images of yourself,” Snapchat’s site says. “After you've successfully onboarded, you may have access to some features powered by My Selfie, like Cameos stickers and AI Snaps. We are constantly adding features and functionality so stay tuned for more My Selfie features.”

After seeing the popup, I searched for instances of people getting ads featuring their own face on Snapchat, and found this thread on the r/Privacy Reddit community where a user claimed exactly this happened to them. In an email to 404 Media, Snapchat said that it couldn’t confirm or deny whether this user was served an ad featuring their face, but if they did, the ad was not using My Selfie images. Snapchat also said that it investigated the claim in the Reddit thread and that the advertiser, yourdreamdegree.com, has a history of advertising on Snapchat and that Snapchat believes the ad in question does not violate any of its policies.

“The photo that was used in the advertisement is clearly AI, however, it is very clearly me,” the Reddit user said. “It has my face, my hair, the clothing I wear, and even has my lamp & part of a painting on my wall in the background. I have no idea how they got photos of me to be able to generate this ad.”

(The Reddit user did not respond to a request for comment. yourdreamdegree.com did not respond to a request for comment.)

“You are correct that our terms do reserve the right, in the future, to offer advertising based on My Selfies in which a Snapchatter can see themselves in a generated image delivered to them,” a Snapchat spokesperson said. “As explained in the onboarding modal, Snapchatters have full control over this, and can turn this on and off in My Selfie Settings at any time.”

Snapchat emphasized that “Advertisers do not have access to Snapchatters’ Gen AI data in any capacity, including My Selfies. Nor do they have access to Snapchatters’ private data, including Memories, that would enable them to create an AI generated image of an individual Snapchatter.”

However, the company did not answer questions about how it could in the future serve ads featuring a user’s face without providing that data to advertisers. Instead, it replied that “Snap currently does not use My Selfies in advertising,” and that “the terms you cited simply reserve the right.”

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sadly it’s not responding at the moment. At least for me.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah yeah, I'm not getting any response from https://archive.ph/ right now :/

E: got it working again after several attempts. Posting raw text

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
[–] warm@kbin.earth 9 points 2 months ago

Doesn't seem to exist at all in EU. Disgusting either way.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think i still have an account of it, but I haven't agreed to anything, so I should be good, right...? Anyone know?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think that will stop them? They'll just do it and pay a comparatively small fine to the government in a decade after they get around to investigating it. And that's the best case scenario. More realistically nothing will ever happen.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah i fear that... i should probably just delete my account

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That won't stop them either. They'll just use it anyway. These companies never delete anything they might be able to use. At least not willingly.

[–] sverit@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago
[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What I'm gathering, it's just the my selfie tool right? I've never bothered to set that up anyways

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Oh no! Another thing I don't use turning out to be shitty.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I honestly dont know why anyone would use this garbage app in the first place. it literally has no redeeming qualities.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait… Snapchat still exists?