this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
795 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

69098 readers
2376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 194 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents “terrorism” and said the company “just makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

OK buddy.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.

Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

Terrorism, though? Hardly.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Pretty much the definition of terrorism. Doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

That's what was so terrifying about the Patriot Act for so long.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 month ago (22 children)

Violent, criminal acts

Property damage is not violence and nonviolent protests are not terrorism. They will claim it is. They are lying.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Yes, but that definition also defines... basically all the most heinous things that Trump and those around him have done in the last... 5 years, lets say? ... as terrorism.

Remember CPAC, 2022?

... kinda speaks for itself.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Rather it is vandalism, because Terrorism, its acts cause terror in the population.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

nobody is terrified, except for billionaires, like crybaby musk.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 11 points 1 month ago

This is terrorism. Storming the capitol is clearly not.

[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The board needs to remove Elon today.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yep. I don't get why they haven't. He's tanking their shit badly.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

They just paid fucking 60 billion dollars to him to keep him from quitting. Maybe a smidge of sunk cost fallacy.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sigh. Fuck Elon. I hope the piece of shit goes bankrupt. Probably wont happen though :/

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

the board are his handpicked toadies that have him a bonus despite tesla losing money

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can remove him from the board but he'll still have all of his shares. And I'd bet he's not really doing much as Tesla these days anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

It’s not terrorism. They were just peacefully touring the dealerships. Just like January 6. Peacefully touring.

[–] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They blamed it on the communist party, yes. There were 8 parties represented in the Reichstag at the time though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If unsold teslas catch fire, i'm convinced it's some insurance scam. A car sold and a car gone that they can't fix anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Given Elons history, it's definitely possible.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

Oh no. Anyway..

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Insurance fraud due to slow sales

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

perfect. let's see if all tesla dealerships do it

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

if you know anything about who did it no you don't

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 17 points 1 month ago

Probably god's will or something. What's the pont of investigating.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It's obviously the MAGA crowd. They've spent years complaining about electric vehicles. They've just escalated that to burning them out. The police need to go have a nice chat with the rolling coal types.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 month ago

I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. 🙈

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Problem with setting Teslas on fire is we can't know if it's an act of protest or if they just did that on their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

I didn't see nuffin

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have zero evidence Musk ordered the Tesla vandalism. Which, coincidentally, is exactly how surprised I'd be to find out he had.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd be surprised if he did. He sees Teslas as an extension of himself. Which is why it's so very effective at upsetting him whenever people do stuff like this.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he almost cried on fox the other day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago

Can't believe the Insurrection Act is gonna be used because of homie's swasticars

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago
[–] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Oh no. Anyways.

[–] the803@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

"Resist" is a tired slogan of the paid-to-lose Democrats, and the last time I saw it surface as "angry-Leftist vandalism" in pluto-fash corporate media propaganda, it turned out to be a Republican trying to cover up insurance fraud. They are too incurious to understand the difference between antifa and liberals.

Kool-aid-drinking Tesla dealers are losing their shirts because Glorious Leader locked them into bad contracts and is now poisoning the brand; they have AMPLE incentive to destroy their own property and play victim.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As a reminder, Tesla is "direct to consumer" and the "dealership" is corporate owned!

So when the party of conspiracy theorists claims conspiracy against them, you can rest assured it's a conspiracy by them.

But that's what they'd say if the the tables were turned, so fuck 'em and their shit. I hope the insurance adjuster finds a way out and leaves them holding the bag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

I don't care who burns 'em. So long as they're burnt.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd set it on fire and make an insurance claim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Very fucking GOOD.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

As a someone from Kansas City I want to say, this is who we are.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

Surely it was a glitch that set the Teslas on fire themselves and no one was involved.

load more comments
view more: next ›