this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
530 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Man Jailed, Raped, and Beaten After False Facial Recognition Match, $10M Lawsuit Alleges::A 61-year-old man alleges that a facial recognition algorithm used a mugshot from the 1980s to ID him in a crime he didn't commit.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 110 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't care if the facial recognition worked exactly as it was supposed to, with 100% accuracy (I know, we are in fantasy land here, but stay with this hypothetical), WTF? Nobody in jail deserves that. Also I'm thinking, does everyone who goes to that jail get beat up and gang raped? It just makes news if it's the "wrong" guy?

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a great show on Netflix called '60 days in'. It's silly and exploitative on the surface but read between the lines and you will learn a lot about the justice system in US. It's basically designed to dehumanize and torture people with no presumption of innocence or any safeguards. The only goal is to punish as many people as possible. That's what the society expects from it and people that run it are happy to deliver.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is why I personally don't believe in jail/prison. Rehabilitation, yes. Jail or prison? No. I'm no professional but I feel as though I have seen countless studies about how our prison system is a failure and how all it does is set people up to come back. That doesn't even touch on private prisons and their financial incentives to get people back into the system.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I live in Spain and I remember seeing a story in the local newspaper about a guy complaining that he was released from prison before he could finish some professional course he was doing (he got ~2 year sentence). He said that outside of prison he can't afford this type of education he was getting there for free. Just imagine, prison was actually offering him a way to a better job and life later. And that's not even the famous Norway, just normal Spain. This is how it should work. Locking up people just so they suffer for a bit is sick and pointless.

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Learning about norway made me a prison reformist, learning about the US prison system made me an abolitionist. I’m skeptical that the leviathan of the prison-industrial complex can be reformed.

Our system is so fucked up its insane. Inside, it’s terrible. Outside? Good luck getting a job with a criminal record. It’ll force you to steal to live, then you’ll be thrown back in.

Eric King is an ex political prisoner who has just recently been released, and he has been on a ton of leftist and anarchist podcasts in the past two or three weeks. His interview with The Final Straw Radio gives good insights on how halfway houses suck, and his interview with IGD is a good eye inside prison.

Fuck prisons, fuck cops, this shit sucks.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately big issue is that 'tough on crime' resonates very well with the general public. 65% of Americans still believe death penalty is morally justified. There's no hope for any reform if most people don't want one.

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 78 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's like America wants to create terrorists.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago
[–] glowie@infosec.pub 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They actually do. It perpetuates profits for the MIC.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

It's also a good way to keep us proles in line

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

He will have some cash to fund it.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 2 points 10 months ago

They'll probably join forces with Mexican Joker.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago (1 children)

10M isn't enough for this shit...

[–] suodrazah@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

The courts will run with this logic and award him nothing.

[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago

I'm not surprised to hear this took place in Texas. Southerners seem to see jail and prison violence as a feature rather than an issue.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but why are the store and the loss prevention agencies the ones being sued? Not saying they are 100% innocent, but isn't the real blame here on the law enforcement system, for jailing someone based on such lousy evidence and for allowing such things to happen in jail?

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because thats not a lawsuit you win. The fact that law enforcement can arrest you on almost nothing is a feature of the system not a bug. They can cuff you for no reason and as soon as your in cuffs you're presumed to be a danger and guilty, as policy. They're not a court they have no obligation to assume anyone is innocent.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

If it was proven he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment while incarcerated, you absolutely can sue for that and you can win.

[–] kawa 18 points 10 months ago

Ah, the good'ol Jail and Rape

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

These pseudo identification systems have been around in police TV shows for 40 years, so of course a nobody in front of a system that says "there is a match" will get excited about it and won't change his mind. Unless it is a blonde young lady or grey haired old caucasian, the police won't have second thoughts either. What a fucked up reality

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't an arrest warrant need to be signed off by someone who looks for actual police work? "The store said it's this guy" would seem to fall short.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 10 months ago

You’re assuming no judge has ever rubber stamped a warrant without reading it?…