this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
267 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73342 readers
4393 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Headline is misleading and the beach is relatively small, but you should proactively freeze your credit anyway. I had my identity stolen a few years ago due to an insurance company I'd never heard of getting hacked and it was a huge mess. The whole incident taught me that it's not a matter of if your identity will be stolen- it's when. Thousands of companies have your PII (personal identifying information) even if you have never heard of them or have never done business with them because your insurance works with them or said companies legally buy your info from other companies or your state's government. Most of these companies do alright protecting your data, but when there are so many parties that have it and it only takes one screwing up to get your identity stolen, it's just kind of impossible for them all to do hold the line.

It really pisses me off that citizens are responsible for"protecting" their identities on their own. Obviously the system isn't working but nobody gives a shit or wants to do anything about it. If everyone should freeze their credit by default then why is this not the default state? Why is a 9 digit number given to us as babies on an un-laminated paper card the main thing standing between us and identity theft when you have to give that number to everyone to do anything anyway? It's completely absurd.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At this point everyone should be given new Social security numbers and freash starts. Because all our data is on the dark web.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That'd end up being breached and disseminated very quickly, especially under this administration. They'd vibe code it and all the data would be publicly posted in the source code.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

We created a totally secure and definitely unguessable (Probably Unique)™ identifier system - an MD5 hash of FirstnameLastname-DOB

Oh also with this new totally flawless system, you're now legally obligated to recite I'm full your (Probably Unique)™ 32-character hash to any ICE agents who request it. Failure to do so will result in detainment.

For immigrants, we will happily tattoo your (Probably Unique)™ hash on your wrist for your convenience.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

This, or it would be entirely outsourced to the highest commercial bidder which also happens to be something like Google, Meta or Palantir.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Honestly, this one is pretty small potatoes.

Hackers have stolen personal information of a majority of insurance firm Allianz Life's 1.4 million customers in North America, its parent company said.

The German parent company added that the hackers were "able to obtain personally identifiable data related to the majority of Allianz Life's customers, financial professionals, and select Allianz Life employees, using a social engineering technique".

A mere million or two.

https://www.csoonline.com/article/534628/the-biggest-data-breaches-of-the-21st-century.html

Not to imply that the broader security situation isn't a problem, mind.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

At this point I assume most data breaches are just a criminal conspiracy between the corpo and data brokers.

No corporation bothers securing their data to a reasonable extent, so naturally they might as well choose the additional revenue stream of an "accidental" "breach" which is extremely valuable to surveillance capitalism. It's not like they face any significant consequences 99% of the time...

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is an absurd conspiracy theory that doesn't hold up to even the lighter scrutiny. Which data broker was Equifax secretly distributing info to when it got hacked? Data brokers don't need this type of conspiracy to buy and sell your data- it's already completely legal. How do you think these companies got it in the first place?

[–] TurboLag@lemmings.world 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I will always downvote Hanlon's Razor. Not because it's useless, but because it doesn't really hold true in capitalism and fascism. I can't speak to this specific example, but peoplle act out of malice all of the fucking time.

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

... unless money is involved

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah but like why not? Acting stupid is a thing.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Stop trying to stop bad guys from being punished.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"we should put social security numbers on the blockchain" - andrew yang, probably

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Might be a cringe talking point, but it could be done with zero-knowledge proofs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

When you need insurance to protect you from your other insurance:

[–] emb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This headline is somewhat misleading.

They mean most of Allianz's (1.4m) North America customers, not data of most people in the US.

First read of the headline, I thought it was another Equifax level thing - where a single company has way too much data.

[–] m3t00@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

welp, hoping someone logs in and pays the bil