this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
447 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3178 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/21370783

On Monday, Mayor Patrick Collins of Cheyenne, Wyoming, announced plans for an AI data center that would consume more electricity than all homes in the state combined, according to The Associated Press. The facility, a joint venture between energy infrastructure company Tallgrass and AI data center developer Crusoe, would start at 1.8 gigawatts and scale up to 10 gigawatts of power use.

The project's energy demands are difficult to overstate for Wyoming, the least populous US state. The initial 1.8-gigawatt phase, consuming 15.8 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually, is more than five times the electricity used by every household in the state combined. That figure represents 91 percent of the 17.3 TWh currently consumed by all of Wyoming's residential, commercial, and industrial sectors combined. At its full 10-gigawatt capacity, the proposed data center would consume 87.6 TWh of electricity annually—double the 43.2 TWh the entire state currently generates.

Because drawing this much power from the public grid is untenable, the project will rely on its own dedicated gas generation and renewable energy sources, according to Collins and company officials. However, this massive local demand for electricity—even if self-generated—represents a fundamental shift for a state that currently sends nearly 60 percent of its generated power to other states.

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon praised the project's potential benefits for the state's natural gas industry in a company statement. "This is exciting news for Wyoming and for Wyoming natural gas producers," Gordon said.

The proposed site for the new data center sits several miles south of Cheyenne near the Colorado border off US Route 85. While state and local regulators still need to approve the project, Collins expressed optimism about a quick start. "I believe their plans are to go sooner rather than later," he said.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Why isn't humanity just pouring everything we have on achieving sustainable, clean energy? Can you imagine a world where you can prompt and mine without a care in the world, leave the lights on, charge your car for nothing? I really hope we can make fusion happen soon

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

To be fair, the Chinese are investing huge amounts into renewable energy.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

The sun and wind provides all the energy we'll ever need. As long as we can achieve a circular battery economy we are good, no fusion required.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reminds me that beautiful prediction

Journalists never disappoint when they report about science

[–] happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

from what I know bitcoin mining is a huge waste of resources and it's still happening... Definitely not on that large of a scale but I honestly don't mind exaggerating the shittiness of that tech in specific

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Bitcoin mining makes money… unlike AI lol

[–] happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

AI is making a lot of money right now because of investment hype, bitcoin is valuable because it's a giant pyramid scheme...

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Unrelated this stuff can be used to shatter concrete or cinder blocks by drilling a few holes and dumping it inside followed by some water. Just in case anyone was curious.

bucket of demolition grout

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is what the rich do after 50 years of siphoning 70 Trillion from working class people.

They will waste more electricity than all other humans combined in an attempt to automate fascism through AI.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] abraker95@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

1.8 gigawatts

Damn... think of what you could do with that much energy! That's enough to go back in time, shoot Sam Altam before he founds OpenAI, and make it back home with 600 megawatts to spare!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

What the heck’s a jigawatt??!

[–] radamant@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You need 1.21 gigawatts to go one way, so you won’t be able to come back

[–] Daedskin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

You can come back, you'd just have to take the slow way

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, right... Well, probably still worth it. This decade is balls anyways.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Nothing says you need to kill him right before he makes open AI, right? 90s here we come! (PTSD from shooting down a child be damned).

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Conserve your A/C usage this summer, though.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can we solve nuclear fusion first? Before we have rolling blackouts across the world so computers can draw fingers better

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Modern nuclear fission already solves this issue fairly adequately. We've already developed numerous ways to minimize and use nuclear waste, including reusing it in various other forms and even reactor designs. The actual amount of waste that doesn't have an alternate use is pretty small. We just haven't really attempted it. Most currently operating nuclear plants date back to designs from the 60s and 70s.

Not to mention things like modern Advanced Geothermal systems. Some of those designs even involve reusing existing old oil drill sites, and the same workers because it's the same type of drilling. Don't even need large amounts of retraining. A major advantage of this is it's also effectively limitless since you're pulling heat out of the ground that's generated from the sheer weight of the Earth above it.

Both of these technologies also have small ground footprints compared to their power output, especially compared to solar and wind farms.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

effectively limitless

And it's generated anyways, no matter if we pull some minuscle amount of it out or not. 47 terawatts all the time (according to wikipedia), or all the power we currently consume per year in about 150 days (assuming my quick math is even close). Of course we can't (and probably shouldn't) capture 100% of it, but there's plenty of energy to at least shut down few coal ovens.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Know why we quit building plants in the 70s? I wish this was a joke.

The China Syndrome, a movie about a core meltdown at a nuclear power plant, came out about 2 weeks before the Three Mile Island incident.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

There's the red scare, and there's the nuke scare...

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The worst part of that is The Mike Island wasn't so much a nuclear disaster, it was a PR and communications disaster.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gods yes! A poof a radioactive steam got loose, and we quickly got a handle on it. But Americans at the time were leery of nuclear power, both through ignorance and fear of global thermonuclear war. Then that fucking movie was on our minds. What a disaster.

I was a child and remember Oklahoma shutting down the Black Fox nuclear plant, after years of planning and construction. Hippies were already protesting, The China Syndrome gave them the political power to end it.

Good job on that one environmentalists!

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't discount the PR from Exelon being complete dogshit. Actively lying to the public instead of actually explaining what was going on and when getting caught by the public and called out by the media trying to double down.

It screwed the entire industry. It proved to the public that they couldn't trust a company to tell them the truth when the issue wasn't really bad. There's no way they'd tell the truth when things were actually bad.

It destroyed the entire industry's credibility in just a few days.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I know nothing about Exelon. ?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I just drove through Wyoming and it's a prime spot for wind turbines. Too bad it's also prime for coal mining...

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago

This must be understood as purposefully setting up the conditions to rationalize systematic violence.

The AI is just a silly cartoon slapped on the face of a much older, simpler and more brutal strategy of gaining power, which is to magnify crisis so it can be exploited.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Because the aliens landed on that mountain and took everyone away.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's at least two people according to the article.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

They both need to step up their power usage. We can't let the AI win.

In terms of the total pop. Of the USA is almost an statistical error, still these MFs have 2 senators.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As I mentioned on the last post

Its going to ruin most states around it too, Wyoming is a massive net electricity exporter, due to cheap coal and wind resources. A majority of what they produce is transmitted to neighboring states, as far as Oregon and Washington.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, why would Washington buy it? I thought the majority was hydro...

Majority, but not 100%. My point is Wyoming is a pretty supplier for electricity to most of the western grid interconnection system and taking multiple GW out of the export market so suddenly is gonna hurt the entire interconnects stability.