Too many people being rude to eachother, locking it. Lets be better.
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
813 points (99.6% liked)
Technology
73798 readers
3519 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You know, I think I'm overdue for a donation to Wikipedia. They honestly might end up being the last bastion of sanity
Oh for fuck's sake...
I'd not considered this was happening (people submitting AI wiki articles)
Isn't Wikipedia where AI gets like half of its information from anyway?
Reddit seems to be a substantial source if the many bits of questionable advice that google famously offered are any indication
reddit allows GOOGLE to scrape it for its AI, because google allows them to use thier v3captcha for thier moderation and banning purposes.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I downloaded the entirety of wikipedia as of 2024 to use as a reference for "truth" in the post-slop world. Maybe I should grab the 2022 version as well just in case...
load more comments
(45 replies)
If anyone has specific questions about this, let me know, and I can probably answer them. Hopefully I can be to Lemmy and Wikimedia what Unidan was to Reddit and ecology before he crashed out over jackdaws and got exposed for vote fraud.
load more comments
(12 replies)
The headline reflects a sensible move by Wikipedia to protect content quality. AI-generated articles often include errors or fake citations, so giving admins the authority to quickly delete such content helps maintain accuracy and credibility. While there's some risk of overreach, the policy targets misuse, not responsible AI-assisted editing, and aligns with Wikipedia’s existing standards for removing low-quality material.
Did you generate this comment with a LLM for irony?
Ha, fair question! But no irony here—I actually wrote it myself. That said, it's kind of funny how quickly we've reached the point where any well-written, balanced take sounds like it could be AI-generated. Maybe that's part of the problem we're trying to solve!
But no irony here—I actually wrote it myself.
I see that em dash I know what you're doing
It really is crazy how predictable it is.
Even saying fair question set off alarms. At this point saying anything good about a response at the start is immediate red flag.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Username does not check out.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
They call the rule "LLM-generated without human review". The specific criteria are mistakes that LLMs frequently make.
It's a step. Why wouldn't they default to not accepting any AI generated content, and maybe have a manual approval process? It would both protect the content and discourage LLM uses where llms suck.
Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content
If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you'll have a company worth billions overnight
load more comments
(2 replies)
common wikipedia w
& this cannot be abused by Admins with agendas ?
Wiki deletions move articles to an archived status. You can appeal.
view more: next ›