this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
206 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

79476 readers
5138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

“Powerful PC gaming in an open ecosystem”

Valve just kicked the teeth of all console makers with this announcement. If only they manage to ship and distribute globally they would single-handedly threat taking over the entire gaming industry (hardware side) in a single generation. Of course, it's well to wait for reviews, hands on demonstrations and the reality that comes out of this. But I bet there's more than one MS an Sony executive who were apprehensive of seeing this day arrive.

Also: the fact they doubled down on the Steam Machine name. It's like a huge FU to all OEM manufacturers who laughed at them in 2017.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think they even can manufacture at a scale anywhere close to the big three. Like with the Steam Deck, it'll be a great product for a niche audience, but the numbers will be limited in comparison. No chance of taking over the industry.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It definitely seems to me like they're trying a similar strategy to Microsoft's Surface line or Google's Pixel line where the main goal isn't really to outcompete directly, but rather to influence the market by a) proving that the platform is viable and b) providing a blueprint/setting expectations for third-party manufacturers considering getting in on it. I swear I remember valve saying they were open to licensing steam os to third party devices (granted, I dunno if anyone's taken them up on it), and they obviously want as many people on steam as they can pull off.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago

There are currently 2 third party handhelds that are officially supported by SteamOS, so at least 2 manufacterers have taken them up on it so far.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They don't have to manufacture them all. That little SteamOS Compatible sticker is gonna kick Windows out of the gaming throne and push steam machines as the default livingroom gaming solution. One of the big things about this announcement is that it isn't addressed only to customers, it is aimed at developers. The store page even has sections to announce that development kits are available. They want the software and hardware developers onboard, that's how they are going to push out competition.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want to see The Year of the Linux Desktop™ as much as anyone else on this platform, but I think you're living in a bubble if you believe there's any universe in which this could suddenly dethrone Windows.

It'll carve out a good niche for itself, but that's really all it will be.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

Here's the thing. Since November 2022 Valve's Steam OS has carved out almost a 5% share of the market for Linux (if we include Linux users who don't use Steam OS). Windows has something like a 25-30 year head start on steam in this respect.

Something like 35% of PC gamers are still using Windows 10 after the EOL BS MS pulled in October. There is something to be said for those users being more willing to jump ship to steam than there is for them to buy exhorbitantly priced hardware to stay on windows when their hardware inevitably begins to show its age.

I think it's fairly likely that Steam OS will continue to take chunks of user base out of MS for the foreseeable future.

It may not be the year of the Linux desktop, but it's not nothing either. Valve's devices are more hamstrung (as someone else in one of these threads said) by where you can source their hardware than they are by the MS dominated market share.

It can't hurt to support this, despite the popular games it /may/ not be compatible with over time, because users are also becoming increasingly disillusioned with MS in general.

Lots of things remain to be seen but nobody (MS included) was expecting Steam to be successful as a platform for game sales, nor were they expecting them to be successful with physical hardware and yet here we are. Is that success limited? Sure. But it has become less limited over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also the controllers are hall effect by the sounds of it. Which will be a jab at Nintendo no doubt.

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

technically TMR, but yeah

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the main hangup is going to be: how easy and simple is this thing for the average person?

The Steam Deck is, any way you slice it, a better value than the Switch or Switch 2. The Steam Deck has sold roughly 6 million units in 3 years. The Nintendo Switch 2 has sold close to 11 million units in about 5 months.

I hope you're right and that Valve really shakes up the whole industry, but I'm not going to start expecting that until I see it.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

I think Switch has a different market (albeit a bigger one)than the Deck.

There is definitely market overlap with Steam Deck but I feel the Deck offers things that the Switch doesn't. In a similar vein, I think Steam Machine provides a kind of value that extends just beyond the console market. There are people who would not consider getting a console but would definitely consider getting a powerful and compact Mini PC with good gaming capabilities. Therein lies the greatest value of their offering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is so sick. I wish the console was more powerful and didnt rely on fsr for 4k preformance. I'd love to get my hands on that vr headset.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I bet you can turn it off and just do 1080p gaming. I think steam analysis one said that only about 10% of people have a 4k display. So that's probably why they haven't over spec the system.

In about 4 years they'll probably have a more powerful version as well.

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

Not sure what the statistics are for televisions though, which is what this is focusing on (home console experience)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, it will do 4K in old games just fine.

FSR(4) is less noticable at higher res, anyway.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FSR4 only runs on RDNA 4. The Steam Machine has RDNA 3, so FSR3 is the limit

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

…Oh. I see, I misread the generation.

Yeah, that’s a huge caveat, one that would get me to reconsider the whole box, as FSR4 is way better than 3. I wonder if there’s a chance for AMD (or Valve) to backport it?

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The linux community is already working on it

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Cool. AFAIK FSR4 uses instructions RDNA3 doesn't even have, so I'd be interested to see if they can squeeze decent performance out of it.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Eh, it’s running a whopping 300W power supply. It also seems to be pretty damn tiny.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm so glad the steam controller is back.

I was an early adopter, I got my first steam link and steam controller in November 2015

I went through 17 steam controllers.

Seventeen.

Because they were built like absolute fucking shit, and my ear actually got attuned to the sound of the shoulder spring breaking. Crunch.

The first one I bought was totally DOA, the replacement was DOA with a broken button membrane, the replacement for that DOA with a malfunctioning back paddle. The fourth one, and first functional one I got lasted two months before the shoulder broke. There were ones I got new out of the box and the shoulder broke within an hour.

So I'm happy as fuck that it came back, but I'm so hesitant. I choose to believe that they have corrected the shitty build problem, but I guess I'll find out!

[–] thurstylark@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm also a steam controller lover, and I feel you on the build quality point, but just remember that this new one is going to be built post-steam-deck. The lessons from the steam controller funnel into the steam deck, and the lessons from the steam deck will funnel into the new steam controller.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Oh hell yeah, I knew all along that the steam link, the steam controller, that was a research project

And I have confidence that the new one will resolve a lot of the build issues. Cautiously optimistic

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

If it's built as well as the deck, it should be great

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I dusted off my steam controller after playing on a Steam Deck for a while, and it felt like garbage. everything is better on the Deck, especially the trackpads. This new controller looks like an additional improvement.

[–] cyrano@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago

This looks really solid.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Valve crushed it out of the park. Great hardware and really well presented; beautiful and succinct.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The pc is considerably underpowered. Definitely wouldn’t call it great hardware.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Yeah, well you know uhh, that’s just like my opinion, man. And without pricing it is hard to say if under or over powered. But I think it is thoughtfully designed. Looks like it is well-cooled, expandable storage, programmable light strip, and you can install whatever you want in it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, but if it’s like $500, then it’ll make a nice addition to the living room for couch co-op games with the kids and possibly serve as a decent HTPC. 4K technically isn’t false advertising, but let’s be real, this is made for 1080p to be upscaled to 4K where most people won’t notice from the couch. Anyone who wants 4K on a monitor up close with 60 fps on ultra is not the target market and is instead looking for a PC where the GPU alone costs double what a Steam Machine costs.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This will be closer to USD$1k unfortunately.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re right. You can already get cheap mini PCs in the 300s with a 780M that has double the graphical power of a Steam Deck. I doubt Valve is going to double or triple that for $500.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Im so curious about the new VR tech, isn't this what the VR nerds have been talking about, like, forever? I guess we'll just have to see how well implemented it is.

But goddamn, what an absolute bombshell to drop 3 pieces of hardware at once. Lets hope they can deliver.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

AMD must feel good about this, given their (apparent) alarmingly small desktop GPU marketshare.

...They really just need OEMs to ship the things, and now they got a great one.


I'd be neat if Steam offered an Intel Arc variant too. The B series is massively underrated.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Idk. The Deck atleast is really small, and portable.
The Cube just seems like a pc tower.

The Frame though... I wish I could afford that thing.
https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steamframe

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The cube is smaller than it looks. It’s a bit bigger than the GameCube. 3D print a handle for it and it’s as portable as a machine gets!

Edit: I mean, obviously not as portable as the Deck, but that’s a handheld.

Edit 2:
Steam Machine is 16.2 x 15.6 x 15.2 cm.
GameCube is 15 x 15 x 11 cm.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's tiny. That's like 3.8L.

I travel with a 10L SFF PC, and that's small for an SFF case.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My understanding of volume is awful. 3.8L sounds so much bigger than the volume described by 16.2 x 15.6 x 15.2cm. Like, my brain goes, “that’s almost two 2L bottles and those are huge!”

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

I have several pint glasses in my kitchen and they're all different sizes, and even though I know how that works it's still weird.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

Not having an optical drive like the GameCube gives it a lot more space for other components, though

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The cube is not a pc tower, it is a small box that can sit on a shelf.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh. Well excuuuuse me, princess.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Calm down dude, you have to admit there is a big difference between a 152mm x 158mm cube and a pc tower, they can be quite large. Mine is 54cm tall, 58cm long, 9cm wide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there any mention of a price? The store page through the app straight up crashes my phone lol

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

No prices yet

load more comments
view more: next ›