this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
409 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 357 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Rent seeking behavior. They want subscription revenue instead of wanting to deliver what consumers want.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 218 points 1 month ago

For the most part, it's believed that carmakers are doing way with Android Auto support simply as a way to expand their control over user data. Because Android Auto utilizes your phone's connection, all of the data that runs through it goes straight to Android and the phone manufacturer. So, by utilizing built-in systems, the car manufacturers would indeed be able to collect more data about how you use the systems in place, while also possibly getting more money out of you through subscriptions.

You are unfortunately correct.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 month ago

And then carmakers will cry that Chinese cars are reading over the market.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] haywire7@lemmy.world 202 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Back to the days of rip out the head unit and stick one in that does have the features you want?

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 120 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I imagine they’ll try to make this increasingly difficult; maybe even impossible.

[–] kenopsik@piefed.social 90 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It already is for a lot of modern cars. Especially EVs. I imagine they are so tied into the functionality of the car that it makes the vehicle impossible to drive without the OEM headunit.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just had a little magnetic clip for my air vent where I could attach my phone and put up a map.

I'd sooner go back to doing that than use a "Gemini-based AI assistant" in my fucking car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I am always surprised I don't hear more discussion about Automotive Grade Linux.

https://www.automotivelinux.org/

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something something year of the Linux car

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it's corporate controlled embedded Linux, you aren't guaranteed any freedom or control. Hell you aren't even guaranteed access to a debug menu. Technically a car manufacturer could make a open a free car running embedded Linux that does give you freedom but the chances are absurdly low.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (12 children)

oh look another problem I'm too poor to have

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago

So manufacturers can bill you monthly for the same features...

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Why I like Android Auto:

  • I can plan my route on my phone at home and see the map on the big screen instead the little phone ui, or worse putting in the adress manually with the keyboard wheel in Korean instead of copy and pasting it from the Element chat
  • I already have all my music on my phone, I don't want to copy and organize it again for hours in my car
  • I already have integration with many apps on my phone, I don't want to set everything up again on the car, especially I can't copy and paste my long ass passwords from my KeePassXC into the car and need to painstakingly put in every password with their clunky keyboard, if they even have a keyboard.

I could go on forever. But as long as I can connect bluetooth and set up my phone somewhere so I can see the map while driving I'll be OK. The worst part, at work what I do is car infotainment system software, but it never has any of the features I would want from a car.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Plus if I rent a car that also has Android Auto I only have to pair it and all my stuff is there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangercake@feddit.uk 59 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Removing smartphone integration from its vehicles opens the door for GM to grow its in-vehicle subscription revenue. Yep 💩

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Honestly, I think consumers allowing manufacturers to start integrating screens into cars was a mistake.

Knobs and dials are way easier to nevigate blind (whilst focusing on the road like we're meant to), and none of that stops you plugging in your own third party device for other features, or replacing the headboard yourself.

Giant tablets with complex menus are dangerous to drivers, and only serve to milk the consumer for things they already had access to in their car as standard not 10 years ago.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 17 points 1 month ago

Yes. It needs heavy regulation, physical buttons is all the driver should have access to.

We also need to ban subscription services in vehicles.

Consumers cannot be trusted to spend responsibly and look out for their best interests.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

Money.

There I wrote the whole article in one word.

[–] cambodia@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Because GM sucks.

People aren't asking for much. People just want their phone navigation and music controls displayed onto the infotainment. Won't consider any car that cannot afford me this tiny bit of convenience for the sake of nickel and diming me.

And if every car manufacturer starts forcing me to adopt their own stupid software I'll just buy a fucking phone holder.

And GM has shitty reliability anyways.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 42 points 1 month ago (7 children)

GM are saying that their customers want a more seamless integration. Shareholders are slavering at the idea of owners collared to their subscription system. Buyers need to stop buying cars with stupid subscriptions. My 2nd hand BMW has a heated steering wheel that requires an annual fee to use. Nope, heated gloves are the solution!

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I imagine you could wire your own mechanical switch to that steering wheel. Fuck them for doing that though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I won’t buy a car without CarPlay.

My current car has it and I love it. So I imagine Android users feel the same way.

If there is truly no option, then my phone is getting the window/airvent mount option.

I’ll never subscribe to their bs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 37 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Could it be money?

It's money, isn't it?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

2015 cars came with bluetooth support for hands free calling using your phone. This was great.

After that, it was replaced with carplay or android auto as the only means to get hands free calling. Stupid...stupid.

Plus, last 2 new cars i bought, i had to take the interior roof apart so i could access the built in cellular antennae wire and remove that spyware P.O.S. And by the way, car works fine without it.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't really replace it though. Pretty much every modern car sold today has Bluetooth. You don't have to use android auto.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We need a Linux OS and DE for cars

i use carch btw

KDE Plasma Car: can use Customize Panel to move around physical parts of the car (HELP the steering wheel is inside the engine somehow HOWDOIFIXTHIS)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My take on Android Auto (I'm sure everyone wants to hear)

pros:

  • free to choose the maps app you want (OsmAnd, Organic Maps, Google Maps or anything)
  • stream music for the app you want
  • decent voice control for maps and spotify
  • decent integration with some EV charging apps, you can find and initiate chargers from the dashboard
  • you can write your own Android Auto apps

cons:

  • Android Auto app is very invasive, polluting phone with stupid notifications
  • the standard is shit. Android Auto doesn't work work with Android Go phones but it's not specified anywhere in the documentation, wireless Android Auto only works with latest android but it's also not specified anywhere
  • it's controlled by Google and there are no alternative implementations

My solution so far is to use cheap, secondary phone for AA (which was hard to find because of the stupid limitations). If someone would create a open AA client not controlled by Google I would put it on my primary phone. AA should now work with Graphene OS so I may try to set it up in separate profile some day.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How long until they start putting some kind of DRM in cars that prevents you from just installing an aftermarket android auto head unit?

[–] shenanigans4u@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They've been trying that for a while. They do it by routing critical cat functions through the radio that don't need to go through there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Every day I get more thankful for my hand-me-down car. It has no heated seats or anything fancy, but that also means no subscriptions, no wifi tracking/stalking, no digital touch screen over physical buttons, etc. All I've ever done is use a clip holder on my AC vent for my phone, so I'm used to it. It's given me time to see how others feel about Android Auto and features in newer cars, and I can make an informed decision whenever my baby decides to kick the bucket. Hopefully I can get something not too stalkerish nor with subscriptions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't wait to get a rental car that doesn't allow me to use my own maps.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

You want the Rental+ package for an extra $39.99, which enables the car's built-in Garmin.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll just take a bluetooth battery powered speaker in my car if they keep locking it down

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Way to make people hate your cars even more.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fucking clickbait titles jfc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (9 children)

the only integration i want between my phone and my car is a 3.5mm audio jack. i'm driving a 2016 right now and am dreading replacing it because i doubt i'll be able to find anything without this "infotainment" crap. i thought i had read that those were being phased out because consumers unilaterally hated them, so reading the opposite here is a huge bummer

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Unironically, you’re missing out.

Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are both just ways to project the smartphone already in your pocket onto an additional screen (like plugging a second monitor to your laptop or PC).

Manufacturers like GM and Tesla hate it because it stops your data from being readily collected and stored with the purpose of building up a profile of ‘you’ that they can then sell to advertisers and insurance companies.

Now if only manufacturers had the good sense to keep things like climate control as physical switches - that’s my own personal bugbear. 🤬

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

The big question is why we started adding computer operating systems to our vehicles to begin with. But the answer is still the same as ClydapusGotwald states...money. I'm starting to think the answer to most of the worlds woes is...money. Maybe money has been the problem all of this time. Fuck money. We can utilize our resources and feed and house everyone without that shit but then there wouldn't be any space billionaires and we need them to save us all. /s

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Knobs are better

[–] arararagi@ani.social 14 points 1 month ago

I hate techno feudalism so much.

load more comments
view more: next ›