this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
620 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Too late assholes... I'm already deleting most of the posts I made on my discord and I will be migrating elsewhere soon.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Novis@lemdro.id 346 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People need to realize that this isn't JUST a Discord issue. This is a policy issue AS WELL. Fucking pay attention to the politics around you. And this isn't just a United States issue as well.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 34 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

I’m just going to repeat myself for the hundredth time here. This is exactly what happens when you define words in such broad terms. Social media does not include things like discord. It doesn’t include Reddit, it doesn’t include Lemmy. But because so many damn people just refer to any site that they can talk with other people on as social media, it became enshrined in law and now literally every service you touch is legally defined as social media.

This is not hyperbole; with the current definitions across numerous countries, Amazon (the place where you buy things, not other services like games) is legally defined as social media.

Words mean things and when words are hijacked for other purposes it allows governments to strip away your rights without you realizing.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm gonna ask: why is reddit not social media?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Chat control was one of the most notable signs that this is an issue around the world with it still popping up over and over in the EU. This is a global fight.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 161 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

This is misleading. Discord is not reversing course. It was in their original announcement that they would try to automatically determine everyone’s age and “most” people won’t need to do any sort of verification. A lot of people and journalists didn’t read that far apparently.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 27 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, they aren't changing course, but Discord certainly did not say "most" in the announcement and it was a single sentence in a long article about age verification and content gating. They should have been far more upfront about their inference method being the primary one in the first place. This was a communication issue and not a reader issue.

It's also possible they decided to tune their inference model to be a lot more, let's say, permissive so that there isn't a huge backlash of people getting asked to provide ID when they've been using the service for nearly a decade or longer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 86 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So they're going to scan everything you do with AI to figure out how old you are instead. Not really better.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 27 points 3 weeks ago

Not to mention, even if it proves satisfactory to the existing userbase, any new users will start with no history to draw inferences from, wouldn't that tend to imply that any existing users unaffected are essentially "grandfathered in", but with the same privacy concerns for everyone else in the long run?

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

they have already done this for at least the last year or so easily. I noticed it when I requested by data package last year, theres a clear area on it that infers both your gender and your age in it.

They are just acting like this is a "new system" but in reality its a system that have had for awhile now, just didn't have any public facing usage of it.

For anyone else that wants to see it themselves, and they have a discord takeout. ~~its located at the very bottom~~ in the events file in activity/analytics.

~~the end of~~ the file shows json objects that indicate what your predicted age and gender is.

edit: I found this file isn't a static location, it is still in the activity/analytics directory in one of your event files, but you need to search "age" or "gender" to find it if it isn't at the bottom

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 76 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

They didn't walk back shit, they upped the stakes by saying they use your chats to analyse your age. That's just as bad.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They were already doing that.

Every advertising company already monitors you whenever possible to determine things like your age to target ads as effectively as possible. If a isn't relying on a third party for advertising like Google AdSense, and they're handling it internally, they definitely know that info.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Creegz@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

To think they weren't already doing that is naive. They hold a lot of liability hosting the amount of data they do, and that's without the obvious gain they'd have selling data.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 44 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If Discord cared about this, they’d use the same identity platforms governments use. For example, in the US, id.me is a requirement for many federal services. While it does deanonymize me and there are privacy concerns expanding this tech beyond government services, I trust id.me to take my data security seriously. It has to have federal security requirements. If their data is breached, there will be repercussions and reparations.

Discord, on the other hand, uses random vendors. There were no repercussions or reparations for the previous leak. Discord said moving forward they’d require SOC2 Type II or ISO 27001 for vendors. Crucially, neither of these certifications matter a fucking iota for personally identifiable information and Discord itself will not be completely them so even if the vendors were PII secure Discord will not hold itself to the same standards. Discord does not care about its users; Discord only cares about the ad revenue this will open up.

[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don’t even trust Id.me. If the government needs to securely identify someone they should be setting it up themselves instead of us trusting some random company that used to provide coupons to soldiers.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

What, and lose an opportunity to funnel tax money to private interests?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't even trust id.me. Why would I give my ID and photo or video to a corporation that is contracting with the Trump administration?

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I thought the requirements came from the Biden admin but I’m not able to find evidence of this.

What you’re describing is the prisoner’s dilemma. In theory, none of us should interact with the current admin because if that happened they’d shut down. Of course if we did that, many federal employees and all of the contractors wouldn’t be able to feed their kids in a week or so, so it only works if we can guarantee a universal strike without scabs. But wait, we know people are actively joining ICE, so everyone with half a brain dropping government work doesn’t guarantee those without a brain won’t scab. If we have scabs, then future admin is left with a poisoned well and that existing possibly okay workforce is now on the breadline with an admin that’s not only hostile to breadlines but anyone who fights back. Don’t forget costs are currently skyrocketing for everything and electricity is about to be through the roof everywhere. In other words, many people have the choice of morals or food for their kids. Or healthcare if that resonates more.

Assuming you’re in the US, will you file your taxes this year? Since you’re not willing to give anyone contracting with the Trump admin your personal information, you’ll have to do them by hand. Even a CPA is technically doing work for the IRS who is part of the Trump admin even if he’s suing them. Are you allowing your employer to keep social security and Medicare taxes? If so, I think you might have discovered a reason why a rational person who is just trying to get by might intentionally support the Trump admin. If not, by god, you have stronger morals than I do and good luck with that jail sentence. Unfortunately, some of us have to participate in society even though we want to improve it.

Edit: I want to make it clear that my annoyance with your response is the Trump admin bit. If you had said “why trust a private company with my govt” I would have said yeah digital ID is hard that’s a really good point we needed trusted govt actors not capitalists to handle this stuff. My point about repercussions and reparations is something the Trump admin is ostensibly on board with so it doesn’t really matter what the greedy fucking billionaires do so long as they fuck each other up for breaking their own rules. That’s actually another great counter and something I’ve said elsewhere; the Trump admin is pretty anti consumer so you’d think here they’d fuck the little guy. A breach in this instance costs them face and money so they care a small amount, even more so if it’s cronyism. Either the world is going to end with Trump or there will be a world after Trump and I for one have to plan for a world after Trump where the US is dealing with all the other problems we’ve made.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Decentralize and federate or die.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (12 children)

Piggybacking off this:

XMPP and Deltachat are two excellent decentralized, self-hostable, federated, encrypted communication platforms. Deltachat is limited more to text (though it can send videos or audio files that can be played in the app like snapchat), but with XMPP, we could use the Movim Client.

Movim can do group video calls, screen sharing, differing permissions in groups, and even user blogs! And I believe the devs are working on adding discord-like channels with multiple groups under a single community. It's currently our best option to shift to, and due to being FLOSS, will only ever improve (we'll never need to worry about investment capital enshittification), so it's not just kicking the can down the road, it's a long-term, almost permanent solution.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They still have the AI shit that looks at your posts to try and determine if you are an adult.

Fuck that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Does Discord even have an community relations department, because they suck. Seriously what a stupid decision to just announce age verification and then provide no additional details or context.

This ~~clarification~~ pathetic attempt at backpedalling, isn't much better either, they've still provided essentially no information on exactly what the process is going to be, and exactly how it is going to work. I also do not like the fact that they're basically just giving up on any attempts to implement this themselves, and are going with third party solutions. We all know that "third party solutions" means the lowest bidder, so this will be implemented poorly with no operational security, and absolutely will result in a data breach.

I created my account at least 15 years ago so if they require age verification from me they're idiots.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmaoooo

Have you SEEN their UI? You know how over the past ten years we've been like "aaaaanny day now they'll fix it so it isn't awful..." And they didn't. And instead, we just sorta... got used to it?

Pffft.. like they listen to anything anybody else says. Community relations dept. Ha!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 33 points 3 weeks ago

"For most users" the whole point here is to gradually get people used to having to show their papers to access the internet. We must accept nothing less than a total reversal here. Give them an inch each day and eventually they'll have their mile.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The company's deploying AI-powered inference to estimate user ages based on behavioral patterns, account history, and other signals already in its systems. Only when that automated prediction fails or flags uncertainty will users face requests for manual verification through ID uploads or facial scanning.

Oh, so it's even easier to game it and pretend to be "an adult". Simply avoid any minecraft and roblox communities to be an instant adult.

Discord didn't specify exactly what percentage constitutes a "vast majority," nor did it detail which signals feed into its age prediction models. That lack of transparency could become its own issue as regulators increasingly scrutinize how platforms handle youth safety versus privacy rights.

Big brother is watching you masturbate, for your own good, of course.

For the subset of users who do get flagged for manual verification, Discord says it's partnering with third-party services that specialize in age verification tech. These vendors typically process ID documents or facial scans without permanently storing biometric data, though implementation details remain vague.

It's not permanent storage if they delete after safely selling to interested buys!

As lawmakers ramp up age verification requirements globally, expect more platforms to walk this tightrope between compliance and community trust.

I wonder if this is what might actually push more people into "host your own shit" that's easy to shut down and migrate as needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 weeks ago

DIscord: GUYs! You'll NEVER BELIEVE THIS!!! Instead of invasively reading out every one of your personal identifications and selling the data on your likes/dislikes, we can ACTUALLY just use an AI to tell if you're a child by how your interact with people!!!

Us: Maybe you could have the AI just stop the stalkers.

Discord:

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Deleting posts is just setting visibility to 0. They still exist, and you should assume they exist forever.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Sorry but I’m not clicking a link ending in .ai

I’ll wait for another source.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

What do you have against the British overseas territory of Anguilla? Ultra-specific geographical prejudice.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

So they haven't walked anything back, they're just adding in a motherfucking clanker as a middleman. What could go wrong?

Big corporations have absolutely laid waste to the internet. There's nothing left unspoiled at this point.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Like all other social media sites, they'll postpone it and bring it back when all the uproar settles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] super_user_do@feddit.it 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Bro it might even be worse because they gotta watch your every move to implement this shit. I'm moving to fluxer.app

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] eronth@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

?? You don't get to walk back my fears. You can walk back the source, but you don't get to say "nevermind, you're not worried about this".

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

They haven't though.

They've just restated the exact same thing but then added on hollow empty promises of "this time we'll be better, I swear!"

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Until they walk back the walkback.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

wreaks of “fuck you got mine”… so an invasive AI scan has scanned your content and deemed you 18+… gross… but at least you don’t have to upload ID (to a company that literally just had a major breach of their ID data)

but

now a new user joins. they don’t have that history of interaction, so what are they meant to do? either upload ID or not be part of their community

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nullroot@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, so they're saying they're already training ai on all the data they have on us? Yeah I feel my privacy being so respected.

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

I left as soon as I saw something asking for age verification in the client.

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They aren't walking back anything. They just repeated their claim, that "most people won't even have to give their IDs, because our AI will read all your messages and decide if you're 18"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WiseFirefighter7299@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThereIsNoEscape@leminal.space 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'll be honest, The UK introduced these age verification and ID issues and many places were forced to follow suit. Discord being one of them and I'm sure at somepoint it did pop up but I've never signed up for it and I've continued to use the software without issue.

My Xbox demands to see my ID so I cancelled my Subscription. If discord starts demanding it I'll be moving back to Teamspeak or Mumble.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

The cat has been let out of the bag. I'm still moving somewhere else once I figured out where with friends.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

hold up.

so y'all took the two hottest takes in online culture right now and decided to do both of them?

what the actual fuck is wrong with people these days. it's almost like everyone in silicon valley is fucking delusional.

so we're going to invade your right to privacy and scan your identity then sell it to 3rd parties. oh, that's not acceptable? well I guess we could have AI profile you and then we still sell your identity to 3rd parties. fuck me you say? shockedpikachu.jpg

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  1. They're instead scanning your data using AI... Not exactly an improvement.
  2. Shitty AI article.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Yep. Too late, i fucking deleted that shit without hesitation or regret.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Never really used discord in the first place. I tried to join a few support threads for random gizmos that had no forums but realized that its a terrible place for support compared to forums. The whole UI was just chaotic to me as well.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

I find it impossible to use for anything that involves historical / old information.

It's all live chat it seems, so if someone asked a question on how to do X within Y 8 months ago and that's what you are trying to find the answer to as well, it's practically impossible to find so you have to ask it again and hope someone is around with the answer.

It's a place that's only useful for live discussions on recent topics, which is quite limited in use.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, so, "most users" won't have to post video selfies or their ID, but you'll still have to accept active spyware feeding information to an AI model that checks all your activity.

This is still equally as bad.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yep to late deleted all my servers and Discord yesterday so no going back.

load more comments
view more: next ›