this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
718 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

20775 readers
1639 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 210 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

I know this is preaching to the choir here, but that is so very out of touch for many/most/all of us.

Those things cost like $5 - $9 in my area, and you can even get the "old" ones for a couple dollars cheaper at times. It costs very little more than raw chicken, and in some cases, the rotisserie chickens cost less. Then you factor in time for cooking, clean-up, products for clean-up, and other time / material costs, and the difference comes out a wash.

So, they are apparently suggesting that having chicken in a meal at all is a splurge. Sure, in some idealistic world where we all eat a vegan diet to save the earth, that might fly. But in the real world, it's literally insane propaganda to suggest that chicken is a splurge.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 95 points 3 weeks ago

These people writing these stories are probably ultra rich, and go to fine dining resteraunts. They probably pay $300 a meal for what you or I might pay $11 at the grocery store.

Then they think if THEY paid $300, then surely the non-privilaged must be paying $600. And they're doing it several times a week! Such splurge!

Meanwhile we could buy these things every day for a month for what they pay for 1 meal. And the quality realistically can't be all that much different. They probably assume they're eating a chicken thats twice as good, at half the cost.

But they don't know who we are! Say that name! Say it loud!!!

LEEEEEEEROOOOOYYYYYY

JEEEEEEEEENNNKKKKIIIIINNNNNSSSS!!!!!!

Least we got chicken....

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The rotisserie chicken is in fact often a loss leader for grocery stores.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, though most of them use the chickens that are close to their sell-by date, so not a lot of loss,.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

And "old" in this case means "cooked this morning".

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They know there's going to be pushback and people hollering and shouting how out of touch they are for printing it.

They don't care, they're just seeding the public narrative, trying to get people used to seeing the message in media that they should expect less and be content without things.

It's not how we feel about the article today, it's about the kids and young people growing up seeing this message as normal.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago

It's just rage bait. You don't need to read into it any more than that

[–] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can also add, as a vegetarian myself, a vegan diet is nowhere near as cheap.

Unless you have the ability to grow all your own produce and protein, vegans are spending just as much if not more for those calories/proteins.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 109 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

WSJ is absolutely on the money here. We shouldn't be eating rotisserie chickens with all of these plump billionaires to feast on.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If you cook them down enough you can make Boullionaire

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Billionaires are just a type of chicken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Anything more than a chicken tender, piece of broccoli and a small tortilla, is gluttony I say!

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Shouldn't you be eating gruel , peasant?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 56 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Rotisserie chicken is like the absolute cheapest food a person can buy.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a loss leader. It's up there with milk and eggs in terms of standard grocery items that are cheaper than they should be.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is kind of true, but a little misleading. They sell it at a loss because it was about to expire. If it's reaching the sell-by date. They cook it and sell it as a rotisserie chicken to recoup the losses. They're usually only selling it at a loss because that's the alternative to throwing it out.

[–] faythofdragons@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

Which is why it's extra bullshit that you can't use food stamps to buy them. How dare people want to stretch their food budgets, right?

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Cheaper to buy prepared at the grocery near me, in Ontario.

I wonder what the cost is wherever the Wall Street journal people shop.

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

In Dallas, you can get one at Sam's Club or Costco for $5.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What they hate even more is that we're splurging on living indoors with running water and flush toilets.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It wasn't that long ago Faux was running stories about these uppity welfare recipients having refrigerators and cell phones, shocking I know

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bassgirl09@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Hahaha! I will tell you, my own mother (70s) buys rotisserie chicken because it is cheaper per pound of meat than a raw chicken and is just as good or better than if she bought the same size chicken and roast it herself in her own oven. Something to know about my mom is she is frugal. She coupons, and will always seek out the best deal. Whoever wrote that WSJ article truly has no idea what it is to budget is what I see. Additionally, some of the neighborhoods that were listed, are some of the richest parts of NY, so of course people who have money will also go out and buy easy meals rather than spend time cooking.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Of course.

Rotisserie Chicken is a loss-leader. But that smell stimulates your appetite and gets you to buy more.

Plus you're gonna want some high-margin foods to go with it. Maybe some veggies, potatoes. Box mash is a pain in the ass when the chicken is already cooked, may as well get the pre-made heat-and-eat stuff. It's right here next to the chickens...

Plus if you get box mash you need to get milk and butter too...and walk nearly the entire rest of the store to get all three.

This is basic supermarket psychology.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 39 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

I never bought rotisserie chicken because they were cheap to the point of being suspicious (i.e. what sort of corners are they cutting).

Sort of the opposite of what I would consider a "splurge."

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They take chickens that are on the sale by date and cook them. At least when I worked deli! So maybe not the nicest chickens but all fine!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 18 points 3 weeks ago

I remember working on the deli when we'd markdown the chickens. Folks knew when we put them out and how long we waited before doing it. There was generally a little crowd of 2 to 3 folks when we'd do it on the weekend. Sometimes they'd get impatient and ask us if we were gonna come do it. Which, to be honest, I don't really blame them. I don't remember how much of a savings it was but it was significant. It's sort of like "hey buddy, let's stop the charade, I need to get going, can you come mark these down a few minutes early?"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 weeks ago

Did Lucille Bluth write that article?

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

US$5 hot rotisserie chicken from Costco is cheaper than a whole raw chicken from grocery outlet. In addition, I have to pay for the electricity and seasoning to cook the chicken.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

yeah its one of the cheapest foods out there. are they splurging on rice and rice cookers too?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

"Gets Community Noted" is such an awkward turn of phrase.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Insult and injury on top: If you use EBT for food, you can't buy warm food. Despite deli counter food often being fairly cheap, you aren't allowed to enjoy a nice warm meal. You can't buy a $10 baked pizza, 24 pieces of chicken for $26, or the $5 rotisserie. No, you must always homecook, with all the extra effort and time that requires.

EBT is good, but the richies obviously think that poverty is inherently a sin. The carrot is also a stick, and will be used to paddle the backside of people who aren't "good" in the eyes of the wealthy.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 weeks ago

$5 day old rotisserie chicken or $11 for an uncooked chicken and also prep and cooking costs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

These rich fucks would complain if you were left nothing but dirt to eat and got an extra grub in a mouthful.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think they're hating on genz and millenials because of boomer embaarrasment that they've handed them a world on fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey kids, did you know eating is bourgeoisie?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

if they cant have chicken maybe they can eat the rich instead.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Dumbest shit i have ever seen published in a newspaper, I think we all know that's saying quite a lot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoeTheSane@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do they really not understand how a $5 chicken costs less than a house?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The rich and out of touch commenting on the poor. Seems to be the norm now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Rotisserie chicken is in some ways cheaper than raw chicken... and I know place where it is the case. Like is eating now a crime to these people?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like how the second article's main photo is of a boomer and Gen Zer standing in front of an RV while the article talks about things Gen Z wastes money on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

If saving 5 bucks on your grocery bill is the thing that keeps your head above water... you're probably already deep enough to meet the ghost of that OceanGate CEO.

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

It’s one rotisserie chicken, Michael. How much could it cost, fifty dollars?

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes good old tens of thousands in debt and property costing ten times what it used to when boomers bought them, cost of living souring, wages not climbing, and of course it's the cheap tasty chicken keeping the young folk from owning their own home. Yeeeesss. Great financial logic there, (checks notes) Wall Street Journal.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

I was OOTL on this one and had to search for it. The article is kind of hard to find, but I was very amused by the fact that there apparently is another article from the WSJ that essentially nullifies the entire claim of rotisserie chicken being a "splurge".

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah I just want to know what grocery store food Wall Street journal is going to call Gen Alpha privileged for eating. Store brand hummus? Whole wheat bread?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›