this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
623 points (99.4% liked)

Games

24072 readers
12 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 53 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't have a massive amount of love for Valve (I like physical copies of my games, damn you), but patent trolls can go fuck themselves with a rusty pickaxe.

Especially over a patent as nebulous as this:

"System and method for storing broadcast content in a cloud-based computing environment"

Motherfucker, that's called a "file".

[–] trash@leminal.space 16 points 5 days ago

I whole heartedly agree, but I have a bit of love for Vavle because of the work they have put in regarding gaming on Linux.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

That literally covers all streaming platforms. Go after Netflix lol good luck. Also YouTube? Also basically the fucking internet? Like what the fuck?

For those unfamiliar, Rothschild has a lot of patents and has a habit of going after various companies to try and get money out of them. They even tried to sue GNOME, as just one appropriate example here

I am fine with them getting valved out of these criminal tactics you know.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 points 5 days ago

There’s a lot you can say about Valve and Gaben. But I dunno man between this and the Linux gaming as of late, not bad.

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 208 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"System and method for storing broadcast content in a cloud-based computing environment"

What a bullshit patent. Twitch and other streaming services have been doing this for longer than this patent have existed most likely.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 174 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Patent trolls are absolute scum of the earth.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

the rothschilds can stand as scum of the earth on their own, without patent trolling once.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, the fact such a nonspecific patent was granted in the first place shows pretty clearly there's something wrong with the system!

[–] ghostpony@infosec.pub 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Note that in the US, the title of the patent can say pretty much anything it wants and be the most obvious or broad thing. What actually matters is the list of claims. That’s what one needs to read and that’s what the actual patent outlines.

This particular patent has 13 claims which narrow down and define what the supposed inventions is.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wish the damages they had to pay were enough to bankrupt them. "Companies" that do this sort of stuff are purely parasitical in nature should be taken down.

I'd even argue that when it is blatant like that law practicing licences should be revoked and the higher management of the company jailed for attempted extortion.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fuck software patents. You don't have to make anything - it's not a specific mechanism - it's just claiming an idea.

With real patents, tiny workarounds are treated as completely different. Nintendo's sturdy and reliable d-pads from the Game & Watch through the N64 used a hollow cross pivoting atop a dome. Some years later, Sega put the dome on the cross and had it pivot on a divot.

That sort of silly bullshit distinction is endemic to mechanical design patents. But I only know one case where it happened in software patents, and it's why image and video codecs are such a clusterfuck. IBM patented arithmetic coding - assigning short codes to frequent values. JPEG and ZIP software had to dance around this for decades, by using Huffman coding, which does the same god damn thing, but slightly worse. When the patent finally expired and ultranerds were free to improve on arithmetic coding, Google tried doing the same bullshit with their improvements, which is part of why JPEG XL went nowhere.

And that's for hard math! I had to sit and think about describing what arithmetic coding even does, instead of instinctively explaining how to balance binary trees. Namco infamously patented the idea of minigames during load screens. Any minigame! And then they used it, like, once. Warner patented the idea of hyping any NPC that beats you, so you won't be allowed to do that until 2033. Nintendo's trying to patent the parts of Pokemon they copied off Megami Tensei.

Imagine if Nintendo had patented sidescrollers. How many games would not exist, if they decided to own that concept? No iteration, no competition, just a handful of Marios and the worst Zelda. The very first third-party example would be Braid. A whole genre, wiped out, because a piece of paper says going left to right is theft.

[–] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

JPEG XL? It's 2026 and I'm still waiting for JPEG 2000 to become mainstream

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

2000 is outdated; XL was designed for 2040.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 6 days ago

I'm willing to accept the idea of software patents, provided they follow the premise of "novel to an expert in the field". So if you walk up to a software engineer, ask them how to do something, and they cobble together something that more or less performs the desired task in a similar manner, then the patent is rejected.

I figure 10 or 20 software patents would have made it past this kind of test. Rounded corners on rectangles? No. Gif compression algorithm? No. But maybe there are 10 or 20 truly novel ideas that were patented.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 6 days ago

Force FOSS or your brain will literally be physically "eaten" by Matrix parasites.

You think I'm exaggerating a movie reference. I'm not. That will be your literal future if the planet don't go Dune-Firefly.

Just Sayan. Take your pick. If you don't stop raping girls with patents, Check out and Sniff my Snow Crash "Patent."

load more comments
view more: next ›