this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
86 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

82069 readers
2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 7 points 22 minutes ago

I've always input my age as 1900-01-01 and I can't change that now because that'll show an inconsistency and we can't have that now can we.

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 18 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

uhhh. So would I need to get everyone who uses the household pc to verify age? Whats stopping a child from using the family pc that was age verified by an adult?

[–] loie@lemmy.world 11 points 44 minutes ago

Believe it or not, straight to jail

[–] orange_narange@lemmy.org 6 points 20 minutes ago

Clearly the point is not tl verify the age. They want your data.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 11 minutes ago

How will this affect embedded os like freertos or vxworks? There are lightbulbs that have operating systems these days, am I going to have to show ID to turn on my light?

[–] baller_w@lemmy.zip 8 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (1 children)

The law does not require photo ID uploadsor facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require "commercially reasonable" verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

Seems toothless. Good.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 35 minutes ago

Sounds like they're lampooning the other laws tbh

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 69 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Simple solution. From now on Linux distros should ship with a big message "NOT FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA".

You want to force age verification? No server in all of California will run. Period.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 hour ago

Ah, the Glock solution.

Enforcement against Linux distributions, however, is likely to be problematic. Distros like Arch, Ubuntu, Debian, and Gentoo have no centralized account infrastructure, with users downloading ISOs from mirrors worldwide, and can modify source code freely. These small distros lack legal teams or resources to implement the required API, so a more realistic outcome for non-compliant distros is a disclaimer that the software is not intended for use in California.

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 4 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Linux from Scratch is a refuge. It would be greatly improved with a package manager.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 33 minutes ago

When I did it I added rpm and apt (and alien). It was a clusterfuck. Good times.

[–] aurelar@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Technically, Linux is not an operating system, just a kernel, so I'm not sure how this would be implemented.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

See, here's the big open secret. All these politicians, who make all these rules? They don't have a clue what they're talking about. They think a kernel is something that gets stuck in your teeth whrn you eat corn.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 4 points 41 minutes ago

That was a 5'19 kernel operating in my mouth, I swear.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

Most of them are old enough to remember when politics was invented.

[–] hamFoilHat@lemmy.world 4 points 59 minutes ago

How old is my tomcat user? How about my various docker containers, are those separate OSes?

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 24 points 2 hours ago

What if no internet? How set up?

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Wow California leading the way to fascism, who woulda thunk?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 2 hours ago

Colorado Dems pushing a similar law rn.

Fucking idiots.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Because it's not that crazy or authoritarian and is basically what most websites already do to "verify" you age (which is to say nothing but asking you your age). But the onus is now being put on OS makers, with an additional clause to build an API for other developers to access so they also can "know" a user's age.

The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The photo ID requirements are what will come next.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 hour ago

Maybe. But it will be funny for a little bit when the data starts showing the average age of a Californian is over 200 years.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

It always ALWAYS comes step by step!

First they will introduce age "non-real-check", then they will enforce the check: you have accepted the principle, so what's the big deal if we actually check it?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

It’s been that way for a very long time.