this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
304 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

20845 readers
1025 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

“If you decide to go with your ego and not with your head, you are leaving behind dozens of wealthy people from all over the world who will know that you performed market manipulation and stole from them. They know who you are, you don’t know who they are. It took them less than 5 minutes to find out exactly where you live … how often you see your lovely parents … and exactly who your … brothers and sisters are.”

So the guy threatening the journalist to change his story so the gambler can make money isn't market manipulation, but the journalist not changing his story is....

What scary about this, and it was mentioned in the article, is how future stories by less than ethical "journalist" can be purchased so that one side can become rich. Fuck accuracy it's all about the money.

Well it's not like that is already the case with social media, but I would like to think there is at least some aspect of reporting that is based in ethics and truth.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 58 minutes ago

Oh yeah, it is messed up and doesnt even cover the section where apparently another journalist the writer knows was bribed to try and coerce the flow of information to get that win. It basically confirms that there is already a willing lack of integrity somewhere to think it would work here.

A few hours later, a colleague from another media outlet messaged me. He said that someone he knew asked him to ask me to change the report on the missile impact in Beit Shemesh, and that it would be “negligible” for me if I did make the change.

Going further, the acquaintance even offered the journalist compensation, from his winnings, if he managed to convince me to change my report.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Polymarket is one of the largest prediction markets in the world, where users can wager their money on the likelihood of future events, using cryptocurrency, debit or credit cards, and bank transfers.

So this is a market place where rich people can bet on how gruesome poor people can die in war zones and genocides. Is this any different from the rich hunting the poor for sport? Instead of a trigger, they click a button, but it's not that different.

Isn't humanity awesome? Can we please start jailing these (or at this point, all) psychopaths?

Seriously, 99% of the population consists of awesome people that take care of one another. The problem is that psychopaths, like the ones from the article, have the need to be on top and control everything and we let them.

Seriously, as far as I can tell, humanity could kill a few 10.000s psychopaths and all of the sudden, no more wars, no more hunger, no more conflicts, no more senseless pollution, the world could heal and humanity could enter a phase of sustainable awesomeness.

No. I am not suggesting we kill them, it was just to make the point. However, I do feel we need to start testing people for psychopathy (as far as possible and work in better screening) to ensure we keep these fuckers from positions of power and money. We need to stop psychopaths from gaining any real power.

Hell, if it were up to me, nobody would get great power or money. I'd have a world wide wealth cap, nobody can be worth over, say 1 or 10 million. Anything over that goes to taxes. THAT will stop people.frok amassing great wealth and power and just stop this shit

For the website: I wish people were still masquerading as Anonymous and would just continuously hack this site into the ground where it belongs, next to its disgusting creators.

Fuck I hate this world :(

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago

I hate it all too.

Take me out first, please.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

I really hope their money loss is huge and will bankrupt them, because I doubt they will otherwise let any consequences for their threats

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 hours ago

Time to boost this post. I have received death threats from Zionist, but I have a feeling these poly market people are scarier since they have money on the line

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 81 points 5 hours ago

Most cyberpunk read today.

How that shit is not illegal is beyond me. Gambling is already predatory but outside of sports and in fucking armed conflicts is abhorrent.

[–] gworl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 5 hours ago (8 children)

Gambling needs to simply be made illegal

I don’t care what your arguments are gambling needs to be made illegal

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Prohibition on vices never works, it just sends the money to criminal organizations that kill people instead of capitalist companies that kill less people.

The solution is to have it be state run, remove the profit motive, and send any money gained from it to education and social services.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Oohh yeah, let the state run the "gambling on genocide" and "gambling on child murder", that sounds awesome!

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 55 minutes ago

Not saying it's the best situation but if the choice is between the mob running it, capitalist corporations running it, and the state running it, I'd pick the state.

The state has an incentive to decrease problem gambling. Even if you ignore any democratic pressures from the people who don't like gambling being pushed, the state also has to bear the cost of addicts with social services so it's monetarily incentivized to reduce problem gambling.

[–] FredFig@awful.systems 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Removing the profit motive of gambling is exactly prohibition, what????

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Remove the profit motive from "the house" side. The house is taking a cut of every bet as profit, which encourages them to advertise and increase their market and market share to get more money. Which in the end means them trying to push gambling on those with a problem because they make them the most money.

If it's run by the state it's not beholden to share holders who want as much profit as possible, social costs be damned. The state is at least nominally beholden to the people in a democratic system and the people generally don't want gambling advertising to be pushed on gambling addicts.

Gambling addiction has one of the highest suicide rates out of any addiction, so I'm pretty sure the capitalist gambling companies right now cause more death than illegal organizations could.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago (20 children)

I think it's fair for it to be legal, but only in specific locations and contexts. I think small scale gambling between friends and coworkers is fine. I think well regulated casinos are bad but serve as a deterrent to underground criminal gambling. I think having legal gambling through the internet and on your phone, advertised everywhere is a serious problem.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

House always wins. It's literally just a way to steal people's money.

And in the city I live now, they passed a law for those stupid slot machines like 10 years ago.

Now they are everywhere.

You know who sits at slot machines?

Old people. Retired people.
People living off social security.

It's literally a way to steal money from people who need it most. And specifically, it was tax payers money.

So whenever I hear ,"but it creates revenue" I think. "Yeah by stealing it from the state and our seniors. Wtf. That's not real revenue."

And this whole idea of autonomy. Like people have to choose for themselves if they want to gamble.

We all know it's addictive. And it's designed to trick and manipulate people.

There is less autonomy there than you think.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

I dunno, I find it hard to respect laws intending to protect people from their own choices, especially when the majority of people can enjoy the thing (or just ignore it on their own) without any problems.

Try to idiot-proof the world and the world just comes up with a better idiot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 65 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

So uh… what are the odds on polymarket for the guy getting killed?

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Can you put out a contract on someone just by betting on polymarket that they won't die by a particular date?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago

Advanced money laundering skill: 100

Lmao I think technically that would work… but I also don’t know how tightly polymarket polices/moderates wagers like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 94 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What a stupid world we've allowed to be concocted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deacon@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Given all the entanglements of all the big players, I genuinely wonder how much polymarket is predicting vs influencing events

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago

This was my takeaway from the article as well. Before the death threat, how many asks did the reporter get to change their reporting? How easy is out to cut someone in by promising $5K of they change just one little word? Who would it harm?

It seriously gave me dystopian hellscape vibes.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The most absurd class of prediction market bets are those where 100s or 1000s know the result before it is reported/finalized. This is one such event due to reporting delay. The 2nd most absurd class are where propaganda and "house interpretation" of outcomes can provide significant profits to those who can influence turning a $1 into a $0 outcome.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Don't forget that people who can make the decisions can also bet.

load more comments
view more: next ›