this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
804 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But in fact USA and Israel are the countries that spy on anyone. I am more concern about USA and Israel spying than from India and China. In this point in history USA and Israel are the enemy of the world.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

All countries spy on each other.

I definitely agree about being more worried about the US spying than China though.

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 5 points 15 hours ago

The only reasonable stance in 2026 is any government entity is just as much of a threat to an individual's well-being and livelihood as a criminal organization.

No one should be spying on you. Not the CCP. Not the US NSA/CIA, not Mossad, not anyone.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 31 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Consumer grade.

Because if they try and ban cisco they'll collapse

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Cisco is an American company though.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 20 points 21 hours ago

Not manufactured in the US

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 14 points 21 hours ago

Manufactured probable cause.

[–] preschool236@lemmy.wtf 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

i dont even know how this is going to work out in practice - who's going to start making VPNs in the US?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

VPNs? I don't understand your question.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 day ago (26 children)

Next up, foreign VPNs and shortwave radios are illegal to use.

Then phone calls are restricted.

Then international mail has to be inspected and censored.

All hail Chairman Trump!

USA USA 👊🇺🇸🔥

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago

https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2026/PSA260312

Compromised devices already comprise what amounts to a foothold within US network infrastructure that makes attribution of actors and defense of critical infrastructure impossible.

It's actually a really good situation for China since they have access to millions of these compromised devices in police stations, fire stations, hospitals, within critical infrastructure networks etc.

Also, the equivalent of mail censorship is already being done by more subtle means.

The US is more fucked than you know. I just hope the US doesn't piss china off too much. The asymmetric warfare will claim more lives of civilians than combatants.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I can understand the FTC being involved because trade. But the FCC? Maybe regulatory authority over WiFi? But this seems like massive over reach.

Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

I only remember when conservatives lied everytime they opened their mouths.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 3 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, Reagan was always talking about small government, and then he blew up the deficit with unchecked spending. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

How about the bit where they say home routers have to be approved by the DHS or the "Department of War"? This is not normal.

[–] halowpeano@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I mean... "Small government" Republicans were always demonstrably lying, as far back as any of them have been alive. Every one of them just wanted to shift money from things that support people to the pockets of their donors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 1 day ago (16 children)

The excuse that it's for security reasons just immediately falls apart when you get to this part of the article:

The notice from the FCC states that companies can apply for conditional approval for new products from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security. However, that requires the businesses to provide a plan for shifting at least some of their manufacturing to the US in order to receive that conditional approval.

So it's fine to supposedly threaten national security if you do some more manufacturing in the US? Uh-huh. How does that balance out exactly?

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The unwritten part is where Trump gets a free gold plated golf cart or some other stupid shit to sweeten the deal.

Its grift allllll the way down.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unintentionally shutting down ai data centers. Lol, we know this will only be selectively enforced!

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Well it does say consumer-grade. Not sure what the reasoning there is, as backdoors in enterprise equipment would be much worse for national security

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Producers of consumer-grade routers that receive Conditional Approval from DoW or DHS can continue to receive FCC equipment authorizations. Interested applicants are encouraged to submit applications to conditional-approvals@fcc.gov

A very speculative, cynical interpretation: something of value will be exchanged for the privilege of conditional approval.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:

  1. get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
  2. Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
  3. Force users to use ISP provided equipment.

Yes, everything trump does is a request for a bribe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 305 points 2 days ago (7 children)

This is just their way of saying they want state sponsored backdoors into all private home networks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Use openwrt.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 75 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This only applies to routers.

It's not widely known outside the ham radio community, but part of the 2.4GHz wifi band overlaps the 13cm amateur radio band. If you turn off 5GHz wifi and lock the 2.4GHz AP to Channel 1, it qualifies as a ham radio, and can be sold as a ham radio instead of an AP/Router. You do need a ham radio license to operate it as a Ham AP, but you do not need a license to buy a Ham AP.

If the end user wants to turn on 5GHz after the fact, there is not a damn thing the FCC can do about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Build your own open WRT router or get one of theirs. It's the best way to go and you don't get dragged through the monthly fee wringer for stupid child security or other stuff that is not well designed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Even more isolationism. Knowing how the usa works, they discovered the equipment was set up for spying on their people and they want all of that "spying on their own people" power for themselves.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›