this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
217 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

83027 readers
3427 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck banning something that any computer in the world can run. You have wireguard vpn built into the Linux kernel. :)

[–] alakey@piefed.social 5 points 1 hour ago

And have you tried running said built-in wireguard on ISPs that block it? Spoiler: you can't.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 46 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (7 children)

This article seems a little misinformed: VPNs are still regularly used in business and are necessary for companies to function. That's still probably their primary use if I had to guess.

People who are trying to ban them clearly have no clue what they're doing as banning VPNs would be an absolute disaster, not just for privacy minded people or folks who want to watch something region locked, but for the basic tech functions of just about any sizeable business.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"New legislation mandates that we no longer offer the VPN connections necessary for our remote workers to access the company intranet off premises. Starting immediately, all employees are to return to office 7 days a week. If this does not work for you, please reach out to HR and they will accept that as your resignation in lieu of a written document."

— Meta (the corp pushing the age verification laws), probably.

[–] punkfungus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 32 minutes ago

What about all of the site-to-site VPNs?

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I know right? Egypt, Tanzania, China, India, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar, Oman, Pakistan, Turkey, Turkminestan, The UAE, Belarus, and Russia all have laws outright banning or restricting (you know, not business but individuals [yes, they can do that]) VPN usage.

But it won't happen here! You can take that to the bank.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They're legally banned but that has not stopped the use of VPNs in the countries that tried to ban them, there are already multiple ways around the efforts to stop them.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Legally banned = electronics seized, fines, and jail time when they catch you circumventing it and decide they want to make an example out of you.

I'm sure that won't ever be used negatively or to target specific groups like investigative journalists and whistleblowers.

You not taking it seriously and trying to convince others to not take it seriously won't make a better outcome.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 31 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Very easy to write "except businesses" in legislation

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 hours ago

If businesses are people then people are businesses.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Time to spin up a small business I guess

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

When do governments do anything clever when writing legislation or laws or whatever?

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

I know dude, literally everyone ignores this. Its like an ostrich putting it's head in the sand.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 8 hours ago

Them I am a business. Sorry pal.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Commercial VPNs are businesses too :)

[–] Larry@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago

"Watch dis shit" - Governments around the world

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 8 hours ago

I mean, they could just require businesses to register their gateways. That's a pretty easy caveat to implement.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That sure didn't stop Russia from blanket banning VPNs.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They're not doing so great, but also, if someone really wants to use an encrypted connection there's ways around it even in places like Russia and China.

[–] alakey@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ultimately the end goal is going to become using whitelists, as what some of the aforementioned countries have implemented/are implementing as we speak. Do not delude yourself into thinking that just because there will be at least some way to send a very short, lightweight message out into the world and receive a similarly small response while remaining undetected, then it has to mean that you as an everyday Joe will be able to browse yourfavourite.site as if it didn't get blocked. Stop this while you still can, don't count on incompetence or existing circumvention methods.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I am all for stopping it, but the politicians suggesting these bans have absolutely no idea what they're talking about or how damn near impossible it would be to actually accomplish: Fight it? Absolutely! It's stupid as hell and will be a complete waste of time and money.

It will 100% not stop anyone with even moderate technical ability, but yes, it should still be fought against.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 8 hours ago

You know they're banning foreign made consumer routers, right?

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Didn't they just announce creation of whitelist for gov approved routers?