this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
250 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

84199 readers
3325 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 104 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Oh thank God... We almost had to use the metric system there didn't we?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We were within a hair's breadth of that awful fate.

[–] technohacker@programming.dev 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

within a hair's breadth

squints eyes

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

No, smaller, actually. A squint is 17.76 hair's breadths

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Are all imperial hair bigger, or only Texas ones?

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We almost had to mention standard cars, which are also half the size.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans don't drive cars, so they don't know how big they might be.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

A car?? Is that some kind of libural version of my furd f300000 king ranch pedestrian killer edition truck?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 112 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Half the size of a pickup truck? So like, a normal car?

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 64 points 6 days ago (2 children)

More like 1/3 the size of a zambonie. Or 11/3 the size of two penguins on a foosball table.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Whats that in Rhode Islands? And how about mass, can I get that measured in bigmacs?

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It's over 9,000 bigmacs. This is what the ruling class does instead of feeding us. That's over 9,000 bigmacs in waste. Per loss. Just flame broiling in the atmosphere instead of going to where it would help the most.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

129 / 4.307213e+10 = 2.9949761 x 10^-9

That's in sq ft. Rounded. Length x width of a pickup truck divided by surface area of Rhode Island as reported on Wikipedia

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How many dachshunds is that?

[–] galacticworm@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

1200 raccoon peens, Rp.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 66 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is the measure in Imperial pick ups,

or metric pick ups?

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

Cochem mentioned! 😍

[–] finalarbiter@piefed.social 40 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

Large boulder is a state of mind. It achieved an awful lot that day and was feeling especially pleased with itself thus the honorific.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yep, they are in Low Earth Orbit. A place that has a very, very small amount of air, so the satellites experience drag, lose speed, eventually the propellant tanks run dry, and they burn up in the atmosphere. The ISS experiences the same thing, which is why its altitude slowly falls, then you see a sharp increase as they push to a slightly higher orbit.

At the altitude the SpaceX satellites are at, they only passively stay up for a few years. With the onboard propulsion giving them each another few years.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Please let one land on my house so I can sue SpaceX and retire early.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

"act of God", legalese for "fuck you".

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

One fell in a farmer's field in Saskatchewan. Dude got a hassle, some publicity, and a nominal fee of a grand or something.

edit: here's a mastodon thread where astronomer Sam Lawler lives nearby and visits the site with media:

SpaceX wreckage in Saskatchewan

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It wasn't from a starlink satellite though.

which the U.S. aerospace company SpaceX later admitted was part of a cargo trunk for its Crew Dragon spacecraft.

Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

I don't remember that happening. I would actually be surprised if a satellite would survive reentry with basically anything left of it. If you want to return something from orbit you need heat shield or you're not getting it back.

Even the ISS is expected to completely burn up and that's much higher mass than a starlink satellite

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A grand? Then I'm keeping it. I can make more as a roadside tourist attraction. Or maybe I sell it to the Chinese or Bezos or something. You want your toy back, Musk? Pay up, you cheap bastard!

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Privatizing space sure did make things more efficient, puh-raise JEE-zuz-ah!

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

Complaining about Kressler Syndrome

Complaining about Starlink

Pick one, asshole. As shitty as Musk is, Starlink is in too low of an orbit to cause Kressler Syndrome

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Every time somebody mentions Kessler syndrome they always seem to forget that low earth orbit is an area literally bigger than the earth's surface. There's about 10,000 of them and they are spread out over an area bigger than the surface of the earth. Meanwhile there are way more than 10,000 trucks in the world and apparently they are twice the size, and yet there are huge swaths of land that do not currently have a truck on them. I think we'll be okay.

Although I do accept they are probably irritating for astronomers.

[–] Rossphorus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Collisions aren't theoretical, near misses are so common that there's an entire department at NASA dedicated to detecting them and warning satellite owners to adjust course, I know because we were contacted about a possible collision involving our cubesat. Prior to megaconstellations being deployed if humanity stopped adjusting satellite orbits there would be a collision within a month, now there would be a collision within 5 days. It's only a matter of time until both satellites on a collision course don't have the ability to adjust course (engine failure or no propulsion/fuel/comms). In the event of a Carrington-style solar flare there's a good chance a decent percentage of satellites would be knocked out, making this hypothetical into a reality. Further, we can only currently track objects down to about 10cm, but NASA estimates suggest about 500,000 objects exist between 1-10cm in size in LEO.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago

Where I live, we have pickup trucks half the size of pickup trucks.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Donnie Darko but it's Musk's space junk instead of a jet engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Half the size of a pickup truck… a Mazda compact, or a jacked up GMC Hemi half ton?

Even just saying Ford F150 gives a lot of leeway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nightlily@leminal.space 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

DDG/Lucille Bluth says about 40,000-50,000 bananas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is this not part of the plan. I seem to recall they are designed to entirely burn up on reentry.

[–] Tai@mander.xyz 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this is by design. Beats the alternative of having every starlink satellite ever launched hanging around low Earth orbit long after it stops working.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

There could be cubes the size of gorillas.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago

Yeah that's what happens to absolutely everything in Low Earth Orbit in just a few years. Well, unless you keep pushing them back up like we do to the International Space Station.

These satellites are doing exactly what they're intended to do. These are actually pretty small satellites overall, there are a lot up there quite a bit larger that deorbit and burn up on re-entry just fine as well.

That's part of the reason things are sent to LEO specifically, because their orbits naturally degrade and they naturally deorbit themselves without needing any assistance or fuel. It also means if a satellite in LEO fails quicker than planned, is put in an incorrect orbit due to a launch issue, or just failed prematurely, it will fail-safe and deorbit without any assistance.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

return to sender

preferably on his head

That would be so hilarious. People would be drinking beer and laughing at the story 100 years later.

load more comments
view more: next ›