this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
199 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84041 readers
3478 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

This stuff is gonna fail hard

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 17 points 2 hours ago

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris's and start generating fake ones?

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

🤮

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Is this legal in Europe? I doubt that will fly here.

I've not used tinder anyway, I'm more the feeld kinda person but I bet this kind of thing will spread if it's successful.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

No thanks, I'm out

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Next in AI: realistic eyes!

[–] SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

Because it's "futuristic" and fascists are obsessed with that image

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

Data to sell

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

So what's the dating scene like for bots anyway? What do they do on a first date? Do they show eachother their prompt?

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Not a fucking chance.

[–] musket528@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

tinder is 0% of humanity by definition💀

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 51 points 7 hours ago

“Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 24 points 8 hours ago

AI is not doing this all on it's own.

Where there are fake profiles, there are also real human scammers owning them. And they won't have no problem at all with buying enough real human data from somewhere.

So if tinder wanted to do such a thing for serious, they wouldn't choose such a stupid , short-sighted action.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 73 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 41 points 9 hours ago

Yeah but then they wouldn't get to collect people's biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't realize there were still real people that use Tinder. I thought it was all bots by this point.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It was a spam bot swarm a decade ago.

I checked again around 2023, then it was full of human backed fake profiles that pushed cryptocoin scams. It's called pig butchering.

Today I assume it's still pog butchering but backed by LLMs instead of people.

I think I was last on it pre-pandemic and, yeah, it was a bot fest. The profiles that appeared to be legit humans weren't all that impressive either.

I can't imagine going back. Unless I pivot careers to crypto scammer.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

pog butchering

Pogs are back? Finally, my investment will pay off!

[–] Mercury@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 17 points 9 hours ago

If this truly were about keeping bots off the platform, I'd predict a great improvement in how genAI renders human eyes. Either way: supposed problem not solved, but more sensitive data collected in the process. Task failed successfully.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 24 points 10 hours ago

Sure, let's pretend they care about that issue. It's not about collecting user data to re-sell later, oh no

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Dating apps are what broke dating. If you are using dating apps, you're doing it wrong.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What a boomer-ass sounding comment. Most of my friends met their partners on Tinder or Bumble, and so did I.

For people in more rural areas, shy people, or mid-life relationship-seekers/divorcees, dating apps are the absolute most efficient way of meeting people you wouldn’t otherwise normally get to.

Bot accounts may be a problem, but not everywhere, and not for everyone.

Personally, I can’t recommend dating apps enough. Boosted my confidence, made me better at conversation, allowed me to be pickier in my choices, and found me my soul mate.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

yup met my spouse on Tindahhh.

Saying dating apps are dead is a silly take, maybe Tinder is dead, but there may be a new option (bumble, hinge? IDK I have a spouse).

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Tell that to the millions of people who met long-term partners only because they used dating apps. I met mine on an app and now we have a kid together. We don't have overlapping friend groups, and although we share hobbies we didn't do them in the same areas.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I live in a tiny ass town where the only two ways people socialize with strangers is drinking and maybe gambling and even then this is not a very social area. I am a currently sober alcoholic and even if I liked gambling I don't have the money for it. Thoughts on how I can date 'correctly'?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 hours ago

Bro they made most of the profiles. It's profitable.

for the love of god don't fall for this

[–] texture@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

god damnit i was planning on re joining tinder soon. not anymore

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

its just full of people who are not actually looking for anyone, crazy people, people who will not answer you ever. And on top of that, there is like will be 10 men for every woman and if you dont pay you will be at the very bottom of the list, if you pay you will be competing with others who pay, except those who pay more who will still be above you.

Its miserable experience, dont do it to yourself.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Our Tinder experiences must have been very different.

Yes, men are competing in theory, but no more so than in real life. And the app literally puts you in contention with them.

The other thing is, if you’ve decided that it is in fact a competition, then the thing to remember is that those other people are also competing with you. Just don’t consider them, they’re not relevant to you.

My girlfriend had 80+ matches when I started talking to her. I had 3. And yet here we are. I’ve no doubt it was the same for the other women I met on there.

Dating on apps is the same as dating in real life. If you’re genuinely searching for someone, you need to get yourself noticed and be the best that you can be. The basics are equally important in both worlds. Be a good person, make people laugh, be interesting, be interested in them, don’t immediately be a thirsty prick, exercise, feel good about yourself, etc, etc.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 minutes ago

My girlfriend had 80+ matches when I started talking to her. I had 3. And yet here we are.

That math ain't mathing, bud. You ever wonder what's going on with the 77 other women you didn't match with? Or are we supposed to believe they somehow never actually existed? Are hospitals lying about the number of girls born into the world? Are 90% of girls dying as children? Do women have lower standards for relationships? Is there one guy out there engaged in polygamy with all 77 women? Or are they all ugly and don't deserve love?

Conversely, why did your girlfriend have to go through 80+ guys to get to you?

Dating apps are incel factories. They have no incentive to actually match you with a mate at all, much less a soulmate. The fact that you did anyway is actually a failure-to-profit on their part, and you have successfully defied their business model and found love despite their efforts. Good for you.

Good for you doesn't imply good for everyone though, nor good for society. They are toxic hellholes, and I stand by my assertion that they are what broke dating (for almost everyone, genuinely glad they didn't get you, enjoy your life of never having to use a dating app again)

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

Every day i had it installed i cursed that i had to even use the application, it just made me feel miserable and that i'm just cattle for the corporation, not human being searching for another.

It constantly trys to hook you into spending money and reminds you that you might be missing out if you dont with the blurred profiles of people that have liked you, which are always someone from hundreds of km away anyway or bots, but they might not be also.

And there is also that I'm neurodivergent, so it also filters me out from majority of other people > others just think fundamendally differently than me. And only people that match with me are people i'm not necessarily that interested in but would be willing to at least get to know them, but that isnt very good starting point for finding a girlfriend. I know i would have at least something to offer to others, but i'm not that good at expressing myself so I wont be given a chance or will get misunderstood because i can't express myself in right way.

Mere existence of dating applications kind of make me anxious, since it means other people will be using those instead of being open outside of them. I dont want to even use them, but i feel that i'm forced to if i want to meet people that are looking for anything.

I have also used other applications too, like badoo, hinge and even okcupid. While on tinder you get more matches than on those others, people seem to be less interested in actually talking with you.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's gotten really, really bad, you're not missing much. It's borderline useless and all about getting you to pay out the ass for "premium features."

I miss old-school OKCupid. Fuck Match Group.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

any suggestions on what to use? im getting a bit tired of not meeting people

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wish I knew. Some people like Facebook Dating, and it's still at least "free," but I've personally made it my goal to meet people in-person and, to that end, I've been (gently) rejected twice in the last few weeks. Trying to put myself out there though, which has its own thrill.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

yeah maybe i should rejoin facebook. appreciate your time, and best luck. :)

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago