this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
111 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] errer@lemmy.world 200 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For years, we’ve been warned that the robots are coming for us. Now they’re asking us to come for them.

Some gold quotes in this one

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Someone had a fun writing assignment lol

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Legitimately true too. People think of Shakespeare as this high class author, but no. He wrote for the common person. This is actually something he'd write if he were alive today.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Double entendre was like falling out of bed for him.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 104 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Its not often that playboy.com is a valid source for technology news...

[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 96 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I read it for the articles!

[–] newton@feddit.online 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

It’s not about the size of the article, it’s about the rhythm of the rhetoric!

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like big articles and I can not lie.

[–] newton@feddit.online 6 points 1 month ago

I understand, you can fully immerse yourself in it and everything around you suddenly becomes black 😂

[–] Deep@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] newton@feddit.online 7 points 1 month ago

Small articles are more direct to the point .

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I definitely think it’s worse.

There’s a lot of very unrealistic hentai body proportions trained into the models.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even the AI upscales are generally worse. I prefer Bluray quality 4k porn as much as any guy, but I'd prefer to watch a pixelated 480p than 99% of upscales which look like rotoscoped animation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I found it amazing that even gooners have standards. I've noticed in general they hate AI-generated hentai and still prefer porn animated by humans.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have to consider them like art critics.

They’ve put in their ten thousand hours studying the material. They’ve found their niche and subcategory. They don’t want to see that some generic rehash of the same pose or whatever, they want something with an opinion, that makes them feel something, and where you can look at it and see the genius behind it.

So it doesn’t surprise me they’re averse to slop.

…or so I’m told anyways.

[–] Jacob_Mandarin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Its impressive how passionate you are about this Topic despite being an outsider.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Worse. Wtf does ai know about Mac and cheese sounds? Dont get me started on the shitty anatomy

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Judging by the amount of content online, I’m guessing it knows quite a bit.

I mean this in the sense that it probably has a giant data set to learn from.

If you are speaking about experience, then nothing.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I only watch porn made by small businesses owners.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's stiff competition. Good for the consumer.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago

stiff competition

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The AI porn cannot pass for real porn that I have seen.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone thinks they have good gaydar because they can spot the ones they can spot.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was thinking that just as I posted. Can anyone provide an example, like a piece of heterosexual porn because I don't want to watch the other type, that is AI that looks real? Just out of curiosity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 25 points 1 month ago

easy bet, it’s always worse, you might just not realize why yet

[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Rule 34, a maxim that everything imaginable has been portrayed in porn, has now been taken to its logical extremes.

Not yet, it hasn't.

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Vic Lagina, who was a lead producer and director for the porn production company Brazzers for 16 years and is the author of Filthy!: The Rise and (Pending) Death of Vic Lagina, welcomes it. “As a former business owner in porn, the prospect of completely eliminating humans from the equation in porn production would be extremely enticing,” he wrote in an email to Playboy, celebrating an end to “self-serving attitudes of performers, … questions about revoked consent despite whatever rigid protocols are in place, … bad hygiene, … and waiting for wood from a shaky male performer” before concluding: “It sounds like a dream.”

huh.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A producer hates their performers? Say it ain't so.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

They mostly love money

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago

That more an indication of how horrible producers can be and how this mentality is exactly the same in Hollywood. Tom Cruises character in tropica thunder is a direct representation of these people.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

More like Lic Vagina, amirite?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

More fingers. That's better or worse depending on what floats your boat.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean...if it stops the exploitation of the "stars", that's a net positive. There's some horror stories out there.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The part where people are trademarking their likenesses and partnering with AI companies to maintain control of their image is nice. It never even occurred to me the possibility of porn stars to be part of the AI layoff steamroller, but this is essentially it. Why hire you for more when we can generate more?

I also liked that the AI partners gave them creative control over their likeness and the ability to turn down certain prompts that violate their consent. Going to grok as a workaround to still get to see someone do something they aren't comfortable with is really messed up though.

The article ending with the long term implications of AI pornography blurring the lines of consent for some people due to the nature of on demand anything goes at the click of button mentality developing is a take that is never thought I'd read in a playboy. This article was really a great read.

I'm fine with ai porn if it actually looks like real people. This weird obsession with anime bodys as if they exist in reality is, well, weird.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

meh. I have yet to see ai porn that was all that good.

load more comments
view more: next ›