this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
421 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84646 readers
4308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 11 points 20 hours ago

I just saw a video on the first music synthesizer. It was built in 1897, and took up the entire basement of a city-black sized building. It was huge and useless, but it worked. Over the next 75 years, technology improved, until it could fit into a suitcase, and be carried around.

The concept and the tech existed in its basic form, but it wasn't really ready for deployment yet.

I see data centers that way. Technically, they can build it, but it still has too many problems to be truly viable yet. There are too many problems with cost, the environment, the corruption, and that's before considering the impact on society.

In 50 years, maybe we'll have the technology and the public policy to do this right, but right now it seems like we are forcing an inferior system to accommodate something that is too advanced for it. We're getting way ahead of ourselves.

It's like body builder who gets on a bike for the first time, and can't believe how fast his giant muscles can make that bike move, without realizing how out of control it will be at the same time, or how big the crash will be when it finally arrives.

GUYS, please, we just need to give them one more trillion of moneys and an ocean of fresh water and we will have an AGI next month!!!

Just imagine AI doing all the work for you, while you live a life of leisure as a homeless person!

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

No, they are not shoving AI through a funnel in our mouths. We are delusional and this must be normal.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The glass is only half full (because AI data centers are stealing all of the good drinking water to cool down their grossly huge "machinery").

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

And meanwhile, consumers have to sell a kidney if they want to upgrade their devices.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ai isn't being used to better society. To improve lives. It's being used to drain and make the Epstein class more undeserved money.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s not AI. It’s LLMs that don’t actually think in any meaningful way. They just repeat what they have ingested. And was most mathematically likely.

That’s why imma pessimist about LLMs doing anything truly revolutionary. They’re another productivity tool to solve problems that shouldn’t exist in the first place and middle-managment loves it for the same fucking reason.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

What you're calling AI has somewhat shifted to being called AGI. Either way, the ship has long since set sail and LLMs are lumped under the category of AI. That's what it's called. Usage dictates meaning. It's not an endorsement of the technology. The same way the computer AIs in games are called AI even if they aren't "real AI."

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

yup. a roided up eliza isn't going to synthesize anything new. they can do some tasks, but it's most certainly not artificial intelligence. and chaining a bunch of eliza's together isn't going to make them smarter (claw etc.,), much less make them reliable and useful.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Seems to me like meaningful development isn't moving at all.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think it went very fast in 4 years and now it plateaued. The only new thing coming out of it is different ways to interact with the same models.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I never saw it go anywhere. I mean its cool and interesting from a technological perspective but I'm yet to see any practical application for normal people. It seems to only make shit worse, while destroying the environment and the economy.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree, I use it a lot for work to create simple programs that would take me hours to make, I use it to summarize text, to make templates and to create Regex because I can't be bothered to learn it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 19 hours ago

because I can't be bothered to learn it.

And there's the rub

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

dont you mean AI peddling is moving too fast, rather than the advancement.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is outrageous what is happening with AI right now, I work for a large company that does contracts with the US government specifically for the VA. Not only did they just lay off a bunch of people but they just announced that we being required to use AI in every step of our workflow and they have decided that AI is so great they now have people who have never a day in their life been coders doing development work. The guy whose job it was to create and manage schedules is now being required to use AI to write code and ship it. These AIs are wrong so so so much its crazy that this is the direction we are going in. If you thought things were bad already its about to get way worse.

I am so deeply sorry to all the vets who will be struggling to get the healthcare that they need because of this. We don't want to do this either but its clear as day they will fire us and replace us with any warm body regardless if that person has actual experience or not. I am looking to leave but the market is complete dog shit and Its been a struggle to get any kind of response for applications.

[–] homoludens@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, well this isn't a democracy where people have a say in what happens in our society. Our feudal elite decides what will happen, so stop complaining.

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Is there a good use case yet?

load more comments (10 replies)

Development is moving along just fine IMO. It's the application of AI that's out of control.

[–] SnapdragonBeehive@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Besides medical science, I see no use for AI. People make excuses about being "more accessible" for disabled people, but you could replicate those features without AI.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

Its the equivalent of using a 80 lb sledge hammer for a penny nail. Swinging wildly and missing 99% of the time, hitting your own shins, but 1% of the time it worked so its definitely good and the right thing to do!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand the question and I'm guessing people in the survey may not have either. Moving too fast as in using too many physical resources without first focusing on optimization or "OMG the robots are coming for my job!"? These are very different views on technology that could give the same answer.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Either opinion is valid for "too fast".

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly, that's what makes it an uniformative question.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all opinion question. They're trying to gather opinions and feelings, not measure quantitative data about each person themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›