this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
296 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4068 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prex@aussie.zone 152 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

"This shit ain't nothing to me, man."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 126 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Over my dead body.

Also, this is laughable:

We’re on the cusp of the next major transition, the merger of humans and AI.

These guys don't even have true AI yet, just a text predictor on steroids that frequently hallucinates and gets things wrong.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The cope is really deep in the tech sector. Way too many imbeciles who think they're geniuses and too much VC to throw around.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Always been this way, no? Sometimes, though, the imbeciles hire very competent people

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's much worse now. Some of these people actually did impressive things earlier in the 21st century. Now they're 90% grifters

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AI is incredible if you ask it about stuff you're not an expert on. Once you ask it those things you already have expert level knowledge on, especially nuanced questions, you'll start to see the issues. It won't be every question it gets wrong, but it's often enough to be an issue.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago

In other words, it’s all an illusion. It’s a ruse to get us to feed it our thoughts, so it can summarize our files and our queries, and it can feed us the responses it is told to feed us.

We already know it can do that since they’re placing fucking ads in it.

[–] Zanshi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's because they're in so much debt they need to run forward to outrun it by... Getting into even more debt on the basis that this time it will payoff

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 86 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

AI CEO D. Scott Phoenix laid out a vision of a world in which the chipped enjoy so many advantages of the unchipped that you’ll be forced to comply.

I won't even verify my age online. He can shove my advantageous chip right up his ass.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 23 points 2 weeks ago

I'm glad I learned that excessive convenience is a bad thing before this became the norm.

[–] morto@piefed.social 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

forced to comply.

The language I'd expect from a villain in some fiction aimed at teenagers, not from a real person. This is so bizarre, and the amount of people ok with ceos saying those things is disturbing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A report in Politico details a TED talk in Vancouver last month

Oh so it's just rambling musings of some self-important CEO rather than any actual declaration of intent.

There are some good TED talks but a lot of them are just hot air.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like the bar is extremely low for TED talks these days. But maybe it has just changed to a financial one instead of an intellectual one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] valar@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 weeks ago

No, I don't think I will

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

I won't even get contact lenses, I ain't letting them putting a chip in my brain.

[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The fuck I will. Unless they change the definition of 'give in' to 'die' then they don't know shit. I don't want them in my PHONE, let alone my FUCKING HEAD. I think about them too much as is.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Just like we all ran out and bought 3D TVs. Right? And Meta smart glasses. Any day now!

[–] Stiggyman@ani.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The smart glasses are selling really well tho. Creeps and people wanting to record everything I guess

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 24 points 2 weeks ago

Another tech headline, another thing that would have sounded pretty cool 20-30 years ago but today sounds like an absolute nightmare to stay FAR away from. And this one more than most!

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The only way I would ever even consider this is if the firmware was open source and the software to interact with it was open source and it had no direct connection to any sort of network at all and required an external device that I could turn off or on to connect to it an external network. Oh, and the hardware would need to be open source as well.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It will be proprietary and cloud based, when you skip a payment you collapse on the floor until a family member signs up for extended warranty.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 21 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry chooms, I won’t be chippin’ in.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can't wait for adverts for the ass blaster 9000® to be beamed directly into my frontal lobe without my consent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago

We could be granting everyone in the world a high standard of living but instead we're going to charge them to self-induce early onset neurodegenerative disease.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

knows you'll give in eventually

No, I bloody will not.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Let me put a chip in my brain that will run software developed by the lowest paid intern using claude 7. I dont trust big corp to update my phone and car, there is zero chance i trust them with my brain.

[–] Delascas@feddit.uk 15 points 2 weeks ago

If by "for a while" you mean "until I'm dead" . . then yea, sure. Any other definition . . no chance in hell.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

"You'll eventually give in" Tells you everything you need to know about the power of large tech companies in the US .

We have the money and the power to force this technology in to the mainstream. Tech companies know that Congress is way too old, way too corrupt, and way too slow to really do anything about regulating stuff like this in a reasonable time frame. They have no real barriers and the heads of these companies don't give a shit about the user as long as they pay their monthly subscription.

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The incredible, sci-fi point-&-click adventure game Technobabylon is about people who chose to install such "wetware" into their brains and people, like the protagonist, who refused it. It's good stuff.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m reminded of the guy I saw who couldn’t get out of the courthouse parking garage because he didn’t have a smartphone to pay for the parking.

I’d still rather break a gate than get an implant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

These people need to be stopped. Seriously.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mokey@therock.fraggle-rock.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's still just a report on things that Sam Altman and his ilk says, it has a much as much validity as Elon Musk claiming that we're going to have cities on Mars by the end of next year. I've never been able to decide if these idiots actually believe the things they are spouting or if they're just trying to get more investment but either way it's not worth paying any actual attention to them.

Assuming we're even on the right path towards superhuman AI (personally I can't see large language models actually leading anywhere) we're certainly only at the start of that journey, it's pointless to muse about what the end would look like because we have no idea what kind of technology will have by the end, it could be a century or more from now.

Regardless the people deciding on that technology will be scientists not rich CEOs with over inflated salaries who can barely wire up a light switch, let alone design a brain implant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I’ve been evangelising for smart glasses for years. But even if they get the functionality I’ve been hoping for I’m still not going to get them, because i don’t want every woman i meet to think I’m secretly recording her tits

There’s no way I’m letting Elon musk do brain surgery on me to harvest my thoughts

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People forget about the other genders when it comes to the issues with smart glasses. And kids. Where is the "for the safety of our children" mob, when we need one?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

Where is the "for the safety of our children" mob, when we need one?

Busy being weaponized against minorities again

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like we don't know the playbook already.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement-3664806/

Now you know brain implants will be used as an authentication system, to protect the children, prevent spam, and maybe they'll manage to add something about terrorism in the justification.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't trust these assholes with a rabid viper let alone my own brain

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

So many people are already functionally hooked up, even if it is happening through their eyes and not a direct wire. Prove me wrong, everybody: don’t touch any of your devices for a week. It’s nigh unthinkable now but I remember times when the internet didn’t exist, cell phones didn’t exist, I had no cable TV, no game console, and would only turn on my little black and white Mac to write a paper for school. We listened to music a lot, socialized in person, smoked a lot of… various things, had a lot of sex. It’s a rather poor trade we’ve made if you ask me.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

The worst parts of Severance + Pluribus

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

They can't even supply chips for computers or phones at this point...they think they can introduce an entirely new product type (which has yet to have much success, either) while failing with the datacenter LLM shit?

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Lmao cant wait to hear about the unforeseen side effects, like imagine getting a headache every time there's a solar flare or CME

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Bloody amateur cartoon villains, attempting to do mass mind control…

[–] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No I wouldn't trust them with something like that. Too many times they get us hooked on some technology, only to pull the rug later and jack up the prices, or enshittify the service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›