this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
234 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84733 readers
4037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doom@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

The educated upper class, folks.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait? These people were having unsupervised exams with access to their phone and now they see that they need to do something? I mean, the numbers speak for themselves when 45% of students say they were aware of an "honor code violation" during their time as students. I was at uni for five years, and I literally don't know about a single case of cheating on exams among my peers.

Seems to me that cheating was already rampant, they just found a new excuse to do something about it.

To be clear by the way: Our exam "supervision" literally consisted of some pensioned seniors that got paid to come in for a day to hand out exam papers, receive and archive your response, and otherwise just hang around in the exam hall so people wouldn't feel safe just blatantly bringing notes or their phone.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Probably had open book exams

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Agreed.

Kinda insane that they were just trusted not to cheat.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who doesn't supervise an exam?

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

Some instructors don't supervise grad course exams for the following reasons:

  1. Grad school grading is a joke anyways, everyone gets a B+ at minimum
  2. The content is so state of the art you won't be able to cheat. You won't find reasonable answers online, or on your neighbors exam
  3. If you're paying full tuition for grad school and still slacking off, that's on you personally.

My undergrad also have an honor code, this means some professor do explicitly not supervise exams. Most of these professor would sit outside in the hallway for questions.

Some would do crossword puzzle, some would play kriby on 3DS

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago

Princeton, apparently

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good.

I had exam proctors in college. It's only a problem if you spent all your time partying and didn't do the work.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Were you an RA?

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like we're no longer doing the bit about the hallucination machine being useless.

The assumption that solving exam is a "useful" skill. Exams are timed, unhelped, approximation of your skill to do "useful" work

Education is supposed to let students eventually do useful work, not immediately do useful work, and useful wprk should be designing and implementing a final project, not exam and quizzes.