this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
206 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

85670 readers
3551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 74 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

Isn't Motorola the new msnufacturer for those GraphineOS phones? And now they do THIS???

Kinda makes them feel less trustworthy to install a security based rom on.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 43 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ive been with Pixel for a while and was looking forward to my next phone being a Motorola but this is NOT a good look at all

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 79 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

From reading the article, the conclusion right now is that this isn't a conscious act by Motorola.

My guess is they used an open source library in their Smart Feed app that has been poisoned with an affiliate link injection. Either that or someone working at Motorola slipped the code in and their quality control process missed it.

Neither one of those is a good look for Motorola. But it probably isn't as bad as the headline makes it sounds.

On a side note, I ditched the increasingly shoddy Pixel a series for a mid-level Motorola phone a couple of years ago and haven't looked back.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 4 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Ive got a Pixel 8 Pro with GOS and I love it

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (8 children)

Seconded, though the sooner I'm able to get GrapheneOS on another phone, the better, as Google's quality plunge after the Pixel 5 series was just inexcusable.

Edit: Actually, pretty much almost every Pixel phone has had some major hardware defect, including the ones before the 6 series.

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

The question is if the next gos phone will have a competitive camera quality in order to be a viable alternative for more people than only "high targets"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Thirded! Switched a few weeks back. Feels good to be able to fight in whatever little way that I can. Though one of my bank apps stopped working so that's kind of a pain in the ass.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't speak for the pro series. I had as Pixel 1 that was very good.

But then for cost and headphone jack reasons I switched to the a series when my Pixel 1 died. Both I and friends and family have had various Pixel 'a' series phones, and we've all seen the quality get progressively worse. Batteries, gyros, cameras, screens, you name it. I wouldn't recommend that specific line of phones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

I said this in another comment, but the same app version being loaded on multiple phones and it doesn't affect all of them, or side loading the app, or launching from a home screen all can bypass the issue, so it sounds more like malware than corporate fuckery.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's app level injection, so presumably if you install GrapheneOS or use a different "smart feed app" (some kind of launcher for Motorola? I haven't used one before), it won't affect the user. Although, I agree it's a pretty bad look on the QA of preloaded apps.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Tldr? How?


...

An app update on Motorola phones has started hijacking the Amazon app for the sake of injecting an affiliate code. To do that, tapping the app icon opens the user’s browser and immediately redirects to the Amazon app. It’s a “blink and you missed it” moment. This only happens when the user opens the Amazon app from the app drawer – not the homescreen pages.

...

We verified on a Razr (2026) running an older Smart Feed v2.03.0056 that this does not happen. Our Razr Fold, with app version 2.03.0070, has started showing this behavior, so it’s the latest update that’s to blame for hijacking the user’s intent. We couldn’t replicate this on a Moto G Stylus (2026) running the same app version, though. Sideloading the app, for reasons unclear, doesn’t seem to trigger this behavior, as manually installing the updated version on the aforementioned Razr (2026) didn’t show the same behavior.

In further digging, we noticed that the URL the phone opens up is “kira-abboud.com,” a website that references fashion influencer “@kirasfashionfinds.” Notably, this exact URL isn’t listed anywhere on Abboud’s social media, and the affiliate codes don’t match up either. The redirect coming from Motorola phones is using Amazona affiliate code “sramz-kff-008-20” which is completely different from any of the codes we saw from links shared by Abboud’s accounts and linked websites.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 41 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That sounds more like a phone got hit with malware than it necessarily being Motorola doing it. The same version of the app on multiple systems or side loading the suspicious version didn't trigger the behavior, so I'm doubtful the app itself is to blame.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but the app developer is Motorola. So unless they have had a breach (they'd like to tell us about) the call is coming from inside the house.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If "the call is coming from inside the house", why is it so specific/not very reproducible across the same app version and different methods of installing/accessing the app?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is exactly why I said the bit about 'unless there's a breach'.

There's another comment on one of these threads that goes in depth about who the affiliate link supposedly belongs to, even though it doesn't match any of their known affiliate links, and it would appear that the affiliate link doesn't actually belong to Motorola (that anyone has been able to prove so far).

All that being said, Motorola is the developer of the app so if they pushed an update that causes this, then they are on the hook. Whether or not they are behind the affiliate link or there's some kind of MIM/malware or similar attack remains to be seen. Unfortunately we live in a time where app repos are being compromised left and right so with the limited information in the article this was my view of the situation.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Whether or not they are behind the affiliate link or there's some kind of MIM/malware or similar attack remains to be seen. Unfortunately we live in a time where app repos are being compromised left and right so with the limited information in the article this was my view of the situation.

I understand what you're saying, I'm saying the information we have doesn't fit the behavior you're equating this to.

Given they only had the issue when accessing it via the moto app drawer app on a limited number of phones and didn't see it when side loading or loading the app from another store, that is evidence against an app compromise and is closer to the behavior seen in local compromises. Were this an app level compromise as you're suggesting, the behavior wouldn't disappear on different devices or when side loaded.

I could easily be wrong, I just don't see the behavior I'd expect to see for a wide ranging own like a repo takeover.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I didn't understand. Sorry about that.

I could potentially see this happing if it's an app that this app talks to that's compromised or perhaps if they have a second app installed that this app interfaces to/that is talking to this app to prompt this behavior.

It wasn't clear to me if they attempted to duplicate this on the same hardware by wiping the device and then side loading the app/installing it from a different app store.

But I think that's because this app is a stock app that can't generally be deleted (only rolled back to a previous version) from my understanding. But I may be wrong about that. This definitely makes it sound like it was the most recent update that caused this behavior.

An app update on Motorola phones has started hijacking the Amazon app for the sake of injecting an affiliate code. To do that, tapping the app icon opens the user’s browser and immediately redirects to the Amazon app. It’s a “blink and you missed it” moment. This only happens when the user opens the Amazon app from the app drawer – not the homescreen pages.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, it's a bit confusingly worded. A couple paragraphs down it starts to show how the behavior isn't consistent

We verified on a Razr (2026) running an older Smart Feed v2.03.0056 that this does not happen. Our Razr Fold, with app version 2.03.0070, has started showing this behavior, so it’s the latest update that’s to blame for hijacking the user’s intent. We couldn’t replicate this on a Moto G Stylus (2026) running the same app version, though. Sideloading the app, for reasons unclear, doesn’t seem to trigger this behavior, as manually installing the updated version on the aforementioned Razr (2026) didn’t show the same behavior.

Just the fact that the same version installed other ways didn't have the same behavior makes an app compromise conclusion hard to support. But you're entirely right that this could be secondary app caused, potentially the update mechanism on the phone was compromised, which might explain why side loading didn't have the same behavior.

[–] Kr4u7@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 4 weeks ago

Somehow feels like manipulating media now that android lockdown draws near and graphene os + motorola is one of the few fighting it

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Shitty behavior on the part of Moto.

On the other hand, installing GOS gets rid of this issue. I'll likely still buy a Moto if I have the option of installing GOS myself. I wouldn't trust Moto to not add something to a pre-installed GOS.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

Motorola primarily makes budget phones, mostly because they're full of malware like this. Same reason some companies will offer phones and TVs completely free.

Unfortunately privacy is expensive. And the GOS phone will be as well.

[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 17 points 4 weeks ago

Stock ROMs are removed immediately when obtaining a new phone

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Not sure what happened, possibly some mim, i dont think Motorola would risk reputational damage for a merely few $ through such low level highjack.

I dont think it any ill will here by Motorola.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 weeks ago

Good thing I don't use Amazon.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

They won't get away with that sort of sh*t when they're selling with GrapheneOS on them- assuming that deal continues to make progress.
The only mobile OS worth using at this point is Graphene if you ask me.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Did they just not see the backlash and class actions filed against PayPal/Honey, CapitalOne, etc. for this same affiliate code swapping scheme and just decided they'd do it anyway? Surely they had to have seen that, or did they think it was a good idea done blatantly and are trying to be sneakier about it?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

I knew it was Joever when my phone came with something named "MotoAI"

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 weeks ago

You were the chosen one!

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

Seems like their parent company hasn't learned anything since the whole Superfish nonsense all those years ago. Glad I've stayed far away from them all this time.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Ah yes one of the reasons why GrafeneOS will support Motorola devices soon /s

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I would have to first have an Amazon app, or account.

[–] M33@piefed.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Any chances to block that at DNS level with something like a pi hole or NextDNS ?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I don't think it even needs to get that complicated.

Until they issue a patch you can just open the Amazon app from the home screen. It only does the affiliate nonsense when you launch it from the app list.

Also, you can disable the Smart Feed app. That apparently fixes it too.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago

Sure, the domain is listed in the article. Most blocklists include affiliate and tracking passthrough domains already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Why should anyone install the amazon app? I mean… it's a website (if one realy must…)

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

Amazon is a computer activity for sure. But I try not to use it at all. I've been fairly successful cutting them out of my life.

[–] hamFoilHat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Even worse. The Amazon app is trash that sometimes doesn't work at all, but the Amazon website works well on mobile.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›