Oh, I'm not saying you should change this post, no, of course not!
And I'm also not trying to work at cross purposes with you either, we both want the same thing, I think.
Just noting maybe a better approach that might work, for your and others' reference, that was all.
Censoring opinions you disagree with is not the way to go. You're in the minority on this, so if that did happen, it would be your opinions that were censored, not theirs. I don't think either should be removed.
And equating Israel, as bad as it is, to Nazi Germany is absolutely a false comparison and a minimisation of the harm the Nazis caused not just to Jews, but also to gay men, Roma and Sinti people, Polish people, political dissidents, etc.
though, that by using the term 'private property', that would be, to the populace, creating a new term and having to educate everyone on what it means. Conversely, the term 'corporate property' that I just made up, without having to be explicitly defined, is immediately obvious in its meaning to everyone already.
That's great for academic writings and whatnot, that distinction, but as the common populace's understanding of private property includes both what you would call private property and personal property, maybe, to avoid misleading people or having them reject your cause as something seeming more extreme than it is, say something like 'abolish corporate property' to make it unambiguous to all people, even those who haven't read Marx, what you mean?
What do you mean, they give open weights models back that anyone can use. Only the proprietary corporate AI is exploitative.
What does this have to do with technology?