Ultraviolet

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To quote the Onion themselves:

No price would be too high for such a cornucopia of malleable assets and minds. And yet, in a stroke of good fortune, a formidable special interest group has outwitted the hapless owner of InfoWars (a forgettable man with an already-forgotten name) and forced him to sell it at a steep bargain: less than one trillion dollars.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Because novelty is all it has. As soon as it stops improving in a way that makes people say "oh that's neat", it has to stand on the practical merits of its capabilities, which is, well, not much.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

We could have had that. Now, we might not even have an FTC.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Strictly speaking, the energy it consumes is the gravitational potential energy of the ore they're mining, which would be consumed anyway in the form of, well, gravity, acting on the ore on the way down. They're just using it productively instead of dissipating it as heat from the brakes. Using only energy that ordinarily would have been wasted is of course very neat, but it's not breaking any laws of physics.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not too long ago, this would be a career-ending display of corruption.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure. Let's just apply that consistently then. Atoms are binary, the vast majority (with fewer than 1% of atoms being exceptions) can be accurately identified as one of two distinct elements, hydrogen or helium.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. Same software, same hardware, just different config files.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think it's because it's stupid looking enough that the brain doesn't even classify it as a vehicle, it's just some weird contraption that isn't supposed to act like a vehicle does, so it's an uncanny valley effect.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The worrying part is the implications of what they're claiming to sell. They're selling an imagined future in which there exists a class of sapient beings with no legal rights that corporations can freely enslave. How far that is from the reality of the tech doesn't matter, it's absolutely horrifying that this is something the ruling class wants enough to invest billions of dollars just for the chance of fantasizing about it.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Privacy regulations are to the left of the Overton window. The idea that corporations don't have some divinely ordained ownership of our personal data is unthinkably radical.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also creating a patent minefield that stifles any game development by people who can't afford the lawyers necessary to navigate it.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

In other words, emulators are crucial for game preservation? This shows that Nintendo knows that, and when they say it's not the case, they're not simply wrong, they're lying.

view more: next ›