Cute picture, but not quite meeting requirements
psud
I think you should include your prompt
PV prolongs dependence on fossil fuels
That's an unusual take.
Lena herself has the right
No she doesn't. Playboy owns the image and have the sole right to control how it is used
Too also quote:
The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (1999) agrees with Words into Type about the apostrophe, although about little else:
decades should usually be given in numerals: the 1990's; the mid-1970's; the 90's. But when a decade begins a sentence it must be spelled out. [example omitted]; often that is reason enough to recast the sentence.
NY Times seems pretty reputable and they like the grocers' apostrophe, your example is some random person's summary
I suppose that's why out of office only replies to each sender once now. I recall that exchange used to send ooo replies every time, and that must have been in '99 or the early 2000s. I wonder if there was some other fix for the problem, I never saw evidence of that problem even then
We have massive distribution lists, often filled with other distribution lists, so we get the related problem of people accidentally emailing the group who need to know about x instead of the team that makes changes to x
Then people reply all and cc in the correct address, and people take the opportunity to email 700 people to let them know that someone accidentally emailed 700 people and that that's not on
Maybe half an hour of entertainment
Men with big boobs
Liz 1 was Protestant. Catholicism was illegal under her reign
I can give you a stack exchange: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/13631/is-an-apostrophe-with-a-decade-e-g-1920-s-generally-considered-incorrect
Wave a sealed bottle of vermouth near it
I mean the AI did nothing like what the prompt asked