this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
523 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4224 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI Summary:

Tesla's 2024 financial results were disappointing, with several key points highlighted:

  • Automotive Revenues: Fell by 8% in Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023, totaling $19.8 billion.
  • Energy and Storage Revenues: More than doubled, growing by 113% to $3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Services: Grew by 31% in Q4 2024, contributing $2.8 billion.
  • Total Revenue: Increased by 2% in Q4 2024, but income fell by 23%, with an operating margin of 6.2%.
  • Net Profits: Dropped by 71% to $2.3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Annual Performance: Automotive revenues decreased by 6% to $77 billion in 2024. Energy generation and storage increased by 67% to $10 billion. Services grew by 27%, bringing in $10.5 billion.
  • Gross Profits: Fell by 1%, with net profits dropping by 53% to $7.1 billion for the year.
  • Free Cash Flow: Decreased by 18% to $3.6 billion.
  • Regulatory Credits: $2.8 billion of profit came from selling regulatory credits, not from core business activities.
  • Future Predictions: Tesla expects energy storage revenues to grow by at least 50% year-over-year and aims to grow automotive sales by more than 60% in 2025.

Despite the poor financial results, Tesla's share price increased by 103% over the same period.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 151 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Value investing is basically dead, isn't it? Am I crazy? How can you objectively evaluate a company's value, notice it is undervalued, and then trade accordingly when price action does not even slightly track the company's value?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

I wondered that a while ago when Tesla was worth more than many other car makers combined while producing far less vehicles than any single one of them. And I remember people telling me about projections and expectations and that it’s only a matter of time until everyone drives a Tesla basically. Sounded like mass hysteria to me back then because the rest of the world won’t just sit there quietly and let Tesla have a monopoly. People bought shares because they rose rapidly in value, causing even more people to buy shares. It’s a pyramid scheme like so many things these days and people have no problem with it apparently. They love gambling and playing lottery. Value investing is too boring for them.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago
[–] cevn@lemmy.world 124 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

The investors are banking on Elon looting the Govt coffers into Tesla. I can’t deny the chances based on the other crap we are seeing.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Exclusive contracts at 20% mark up. Can’t wait for all police vehicles to switch over to teslas.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'd support that: the new excuses as to why a suspect escaped would be fantastic.

"Well, I would have caught him but my car died for some reason and I couldn't get out."

"Well, I would have caught him but I hit a bump and half my car fell off."

"Well, I would have caught him, but my car caught fire and killed my partner."

"Well, I would haved caught him but it was raining so my bumper fell off and punctured my tire."

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Don’t worry, none of these would make the news.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

True enough. A bet on any tech stocks right now is probably safe on that basis - but I expect they really do plan to crash the stock market at some point... It would make sense if you wanted to consolidate ownership cheaply.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They're also banking on Elon staying alive for the next 4y which is a risky bet given how he immediately antagonised the MAGA crowd on H1Bs.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago

The MAGA crowd hates just about everybody. The last time they did anything of note was the 1/6 insurrection, and that was with the help of Dear Leader.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That but also removing green subsidies helps Tesla as it's further ahead than other electric car rivals. Also, less safety regulations likely brings it closer to fully autonomous driving.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not new to Tesla. Avoid bubble stocks. Avoid penny stocks. Buy “stodgy”

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I'm not into Tesla stock. I'm not just here to whine about a single stock not doing what I want, it's that I think price action in general is too irrational. I've got an axe to grind here and it goes beyond which stocks to pick.

Huge ETFs and algorithmic trading makes too many tickers move all the same way. This harms price discovery. And don't get me started on off-exchange trading; This month, off-exchange volume exceeded that of lit markets.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Value investing isn't dead. There are tons of value investors, and they aren't the ones buying Tesla.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My point is, if this is how markets react to worsening sales and an actually insane CEO how can you trust a rational bet to pay off?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Value investors don't invest in Tesla, so you should not expect its share price to reflect fundamentals.

But they do invest in stocks like Coca Cola and American Express, so you should expect the share prices of those companies to better reflect fundamentals.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That's just another way of saying buyer sentiment is the only thing that matters, in which case we're back to square one.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Pretty much the definition of bubble stocks. If you don’t want emotion driven stocks, don’t ride the hype train. There are many many more stock opportunities, most of whose value is related to actual facts

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

If you're a value investor then you believe that the actual value of a company depends on its current and future earnings and the market price will tend towards the actual value in the long run.

But naturally there are other factors that also influence the market price. In fact, the whole point of value investing is to find stocks that are "underpriced". For various reasons, they are currently priced at a discount to their actual value. Those are the stocks you should buy, and you should expect their price to increase.

Conversely, for various reasons some stocks are "overpriced", like Tesla. You should not buy those, because you expect their price to decrease in the long run.

A corollary is that value investors expect seemingly irrational price movements like we see with Tesla. If share prices perfectly reflected fundamentals, then it would be impossible to find a "good deal".

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right. So anyway, the market does often appear oversensitive to buzz and under-responsive to fundamentals. What's your take on market reforms? Are there any changes you'd like to see, regulatory or otherwise?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't care if the market is under responsive to fundamentals. That just means some investors are exercising poor judgment by paying too much attention to irrelevant factors. It also gives an opportunity to investors with better judgment.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Do you get why this is starting to feel very circular? If not, please don't trouble yourself to respond. Sincerely.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I'm not sure what you mean.

You seem to be starting with the assumption that market prices should reflect fundamentals, and questioning why they don't. But why do you assume that?

"In the short-run, the stock market is a voting machine. But in the long-run, it is a weighing machine."

You can't ignore or eliminate either machine.