this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
709 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

this developer is a big prick. i had an issue (that turned out to be user error after getting help from another source) with the android version of duckstation so went to their discord for support. instead of offering any aid or insight, i was immediately stereotyped as "an android user" and told "we don't offer tech support for android" basically for no other reason than "because android users bitch too much and then give you a bad review," which is just kind of insane imo? there's no downside to bad reviews like you're not going to get delisted? anyways, completely not surprised to hear this from that ass. it genuinely seems like this guy hates developing duckstation at all and i am confused why he bothers. give it up man, sounds like you'll be happier

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

"I don't want to get bad reviews so I'm going to be a massive dick to my users"

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like someone who uses Windows and is annoyed that anyone else uses anything other than Windows.

I dunno about anyone else, but that's a giant red flag for me when it comes to software devs

Eh, I use Linux and am annoyed at issues from users on other systems. I don't know Windows dev very well, so fixing issues on Windows is a pain for me. Likewise for macOS.

So I get it.

That said, the proper way to handle this is to make it explicit what platforms are supported and which are not, accept fixes for unsupported platforms that don't break supported platforms, close issues related to packaging and whatnot on other platforms, and leave open and ignore issues for unsupported platforms. Let the community support what they want, and focus on what you want.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

instead of offering any aid or insight, i was immediately stereotyped as “an android user” and told “we don’t offer tech support for android” basically for no other reason than “because android users bitch too much and then give you a bad review,”

This sounds like there were several users berating you, not (just) the developer?

It's a tricky one. You can't ban every user from your Discord just for being condescending.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The developer also had a massive drama with RetroArch because, wait for it... "RetroArch users complain too much!" so that's actually a common sentiment coming from them and it's absolutely not restricted to Linux. He hates Linux users, Android users, RetroArch users... at this point I wonder why even publish this as a public user facing project at all, he clearly hates users.

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In his defense, a LOT of emulator maintainers have this sentiment about RetroArch, so I can't fault him too much for that one in particular.

I do get the sense this is more common with emulators in general.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In his defense, a LOT of emulator maintainers have this sentiment about RetroArch, so I can’t fault him too much for that one in particular.

Then release your emulator as a paid app for iOS with a closed source and go nuts. Otherwise it's like going out naked during a rainy day and shouting you're getting wet.

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Agreed really, but less about the RetroArch part and more just in general with the way this person in particular is. In my mind, if you're not ready to be able to turn the project over to the community to maintain instead of yourself because you're as much of a controlling prick as this guy, then you should never make it even source-available and should just keep it private source.

[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the problem with retroarch ? Am curious.

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

I've seen multiple emulator devs frustrated with how demanding the project itself is, but moreso toxic behavior from the lead developer towards emulator devs and users alike. Can't handle any kind of even constructive criticism worth a damn and when people understandably are frustrated by him lashing out he then turns it back around to say they're out to get him.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I've seen this, some server Admins and mods actually encourage the behavior via modeling. They do it once and that gives permission to the other users to act similarly. Becoming a cultural problem with the whole server. Then they don't ever correct or moderate the behavior, further encouraging it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like hes just tired of dealing with idiots.

Which I can sympathise with.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who forces him to respond to such messages on Discord? He can just not engage with people of whom he thinks are idiots.

If he doesn’t want to engage with users at all, maybe not set up a Discord in the first place.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. Some people just simply can't ignore that shit. Why can't those users just not post asinine comments.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So not setting up a Discord in the first place is not an option because some people are so desperate to get feedback even though they are annoyed by feedback?

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Eg., Phil Fish of FEZ and Indy game: the movie fame is another who seems unable to ignore negative feedback and massively overreacts to it.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, he's not wrong, plenty of pre-release games allow you to download before it's out, then android users go and give it 1 star because the servers aren't open yet.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you help me underatand where you proved him wrong?

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who said he was wrong? He basically guaranteed that android users will respond that way by refusing to support them, thus ensuring he will always be right about them

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

it genuinely seems like this guy hates developing duckstation at all.

I don't think you get it. He probably enjoys creating, and achieving something awesome. He has no obligation to deal with entitled users of what he gives away

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago

Then he really shouldn't have a discord server where he offers tech support.

It's one thing to not give anyone lemonade, you're never obligated to do that for no reason, however it's another thing to set up a free lemonade stand and tell whoever tries to get lemonade that they're annoying and to go away.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If he only wants to create something and not deal with any user issues, he could just do that. Going out of his way to tell users to fuck off is extra work he could just not do and everyone would be happier

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean "self-entitled". "Entitled" means that you actually are owed something. It's like the difference between righteous and self-righteous.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Merriam Webster seems to agree with me.