this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
462 points (95.7% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
976 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 241 points 1 month ago (9 children)

There are more appropriate ways to say this:

"Nobody with kids. I might want kids some day, but I'm not ready yet, and it feels like there would be too much pressure to either be involved with her kids or be cut out of a major portion of her life until we're really serious. And again, not ready.

And somebody athletic, since I'm into biking and hiking and other activities that require a certain level of fitness.

And... well, somebody who isn't into the whole casual sex thing, honestly. I think sex is special and, for me, requires a strong emotional connection. I want someone who has similar views on sex."

See, I feel like it changes it when you're not focusing on the other person, but yourself. I'm not ready for kids, I'm into fitness, I'm a demisexual. It sets up the same thing without disparaging people who aren't what you're looking for.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'll first say that from a social standpoint it makes sense to focus on yourself when asked that. But the person asked "tell me what you look for in a girl". You would have to be pretty damn masterful at thinking on your feet to take that question and immediately flip your answers into I statements. Especially if you're anon and obviously don't get asked things like this a lot.

No kids is a common wish although the reason for it can make or break how fine it is to have.

My guess is that anon is overweight, and the person they were talking to was thinking of friends they had that were overweight and were great people.

Anon betrayed that their preference was a bit delusional and/or didn't understand that it can take work to be in shape and takes it for granted that women should be expected to be fit for him without him having to do anything. That's a pretty sour fart of an opinion.

The no dating apps thing is pretty cringe. And could certainly make you seem like a pariah to most people. It definitely betrays a sense of superiority if it's in your top 3 dating requirements. I feel like anon knowing the word demisexual is slim to none but that would be the best thing you could say.

Actually my guess is that this is fake and anon is just stirring the hate mongering pot.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I also casually declare strangers I meet at a bar for 20 minutes to be great catches and offer up any of my single friends phone numbers. Dont you?

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

friend's gf

few hours

I agree that it's likely made up, and that the guy likely has a lot of misogynistic views, but you at least don't need to misrepresent the post.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Thats fair, I was trying to highlight how they just met. Two hours is more time but still, would be strange to try and hook them up with someone.

I also think its odd from his perspective. He just met her, they are drinking, she barely knows him, and yet has a bunch of single friends who are perfect for him.

If I were him I would change the topic immediately. But then again I wouldnt go to a bar for romance in the first place.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's always possible the friends were in the same league as OP

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Knowing someone for a few hours at a bar in public does not mean you know their type, or even understand who they are on any meaningful level.

Bar style dating where you pick a stranger to attempt to bring home is absurd to begin with though, in my opinion.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My only gripe with this is that nobody should have to defend themself for not wanting kids. If you don't want kids then you don't want kids and should be able to just leave it at that.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

Nobody SHOULD have to explain anything. So it's okay to not do it. but if you're on a date, where you're trying to put yourself out there and establish at least a friendly relationship, you probably want to be cordial and share your thoughts on the matter. Instead of just shutting down mid-date.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I don't consider it a defense, exactly. It's more clarification. Just saying "no kids" might suggest he doesn't want kids ever, which would reduce the potential partners unnecessarily (and if he does want kids eventually, being paired with someone specifically because they don't want kids would just create problems later). Saying "no kids yet" sets them up with someone who doesn't have kids but might in the future.

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like how you put this. Anon was asked requirements and all he gave were deal-breakers. It comes off as desperate, crass, or both.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its also fake. I could rewrite the ending.

"Friends GF laughs uncontrollably at my list of dealbreakers, as she's drunk and at a bar, not sober at a coffee shop"

"Friends gf proceeds to go around the bar posing my list to every woman, and eventually also all the men, hysterically laughing the whole time while I try to hide by the jukebox."

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That friend? Albert Einstein.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That Einstein was a handful!

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is an actualized response. In the moment a lot of people can't pull this off, it does take practice. You're right, of course, this is better...I just wish people would more commonly be willing to ask a clarifying question or two before pulling out the butcher's knife.

Some folks just aren't good with their words and may otherwise be great people. In this situation, true or not, they were talking for some time. I think that level of interaction is worth some benefit of the doubt and the tiniest bit of patience. Instead, despite hitting it off and having a great conversation, shallow lady over there judges him by a single moment amongst probably a dozen leading up to it.

...but that is how it goes. That's the game. It's all just a bit silly though.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

This is an actualized response...

I agree with you 100%, but I'd say it's easier than it seems. It does require practice, for sure, but I'd argue that talking like an incel also requires practice. (Lee's assume the fictional guy in the Green text got his practice on 4Chan).

I think the thing is that bro is making a choice; whether that choice is to consciously talk about the things he dislikes in low value females, instead of just himself or what he likes (as you would do in date), or to spend his day on 4Chan, unconsciously practicing and learning how to be more like Andrew Tate.

Either way, the problem is not lack of skill, it's the choice to do nothing or even dig in harder into poor communication skills.

Then comes the lack of appropriate feedback, without judgement, to help them realize that it is them who are turning themselves into "low-value men" if there were to judge themselves by the same measure.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

The good thing is that people have time to practice. People who are bad with their words already know it, and they clearly could practice if only they felt it had value.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Anon is definitely not into fitness though. Probably a lard ass himself.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Also, this is just a really negative set of statements. "I DON'T want X, Y, and Z." Even giving anon a pretty big benefit of the doubt and assuming they didn't state it like "No fatties," they aren't really saying what they want in a partner, just a bunch of standards by which they would judge somebody.

The search for a romantic partner should involve more positives than negatives. You should have ideas about what things you like in people and yourself, and what interests and activities that you're passionate about and would like to share with someone. If you start with a laundry list of things that you don't like, that's not just going to be off-putting, it's going to be limiting you to thinking only in those terms, rather than finding something that brings you joy, and finding someone that has that in common with you.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Bingo! It's not always what you say but HOW you say it.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Yep, it's all about the framing.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

That’s what he should have said. What he probably said was “no fat chicks, no crotch goblins, no hoes.”