this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
166 points (96.6% liked)

Games

16785 readers
826 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Funny how a trillion dollar monopoly can't keep a studio that makes very highly rated games alive.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because at that level it has nothing to do with the actual studio or people. It's just numbers on a spreadsheet to a team of accountants moving columns around so the final spreadsheet every 3 months looks as good as possible.

Normally without a sale like this, they would maintain IP rights to sell or use later by whatever studio they wanted to use. The studios are a tool to make the product, nothing more.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Normally a company struggling with console sales would lean into an IP that could sway consumers, even if the game itself didn't make a ton of money.

Sony pumps money into big IPs to do the same, at the expense of game profits.

[–] imecth@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Normally a company struggling with console sales

You're assuming microsoft still cares about selling consoles... at this point either they gave up on this generation, or they moved on altogether.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

What I don't understand is what the point was in buying all of these expensive studios if they weren't going to compete.

[–] Silverseren@fedia.io 26 points 3 months ago

Well, that's good. Though I have some concerns about how well Krafton is as a manager for such things. Also, didn't a lot of the developers and other people in Tango already quit before this anyways and went to do other things or joined other studios?

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Remember when the real value were the people building amazing games and not just the IP?

Larion studios/krafton inc remembers.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So, how long do I have to wait to buy Hi Fi Rush for it to benefit the new studio?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm pretty sure Microsoft still own hi fi rush. This'll just be that the company with is Devs have been bought so they can continue working together

Edit: I just actually read it and saw that they did indeed but the ip too. That's awesome.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think MS gets a cut of Hi-Fi Rush 1 no matter what, which you should get and play because it's awesome. Hi-Fi Rush 2 will be the one benefiting Krafton.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I played it on gamepass, but I've been thinking of getting it on steam, especially if the money would go to the new studio.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago
[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not a fan of Krafton but I'm glad this team gets to keep their jobs and hopefully they're allowed to make a sequel.