this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
483 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12525 readers
788 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How long until they replace driving lessons with a page that says "not driving a car is the only 100% effective method to prevent car crashes"?

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

I assume they're trying to out-do the old Soviet joke.

Preface to a new sex education schoolbook:
"Dear children. There are three kinds of love. First, there is the love between parents and children. We're sure all of you are already familiar with that, so there is no need to discuss it here. Second, there is the love between two adults. Some suggest it might be too early to tell you anything about that yet. And third, there's the love the People feel toward the Party, and that is what we shall discuss for the rest of this book..."

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Religious indoctrination and shaming.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Shouldn't separation of church and state also separate the state from ideologies espoused by the church

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Republicans aren't in the business of being logically consistent or even the least bit honest, though.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Most people aren't

Humans are animals

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

That's why they're blatantly doing away with separation of church and state.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 days ago

Essentially "Don't do it if you don't want to catch a disease, get pregnant, or get someone else pregnant. Only way to be absolutely sure."

Which is true, to be fair. I mean a majority of students aren't going to implement that and it's missing 99% of what you should probably know, but what little is left isn't wrong as such.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Easily fix your demographic issues with this one trick

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

"Never touch your penis or angels will kill you." - Stan Smith

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

For everything else there's pornhub.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Conservatives... We were expecting all poor women to be pregnant by this time. Now we have a glut of pregnancy related paper and plastic products as well as an incoming avalanche of mini vans, baby carriers, Filipino immigrants to make more Filipino citizens to then care for all these Floridian people when they're old and under the UnitedHealth umbrella to recover a few more billions. We were prepared! But now, sir, we have to live with this. I mean, I have to go get doughnuts and just look at the mass of people fucking everywhere that I have to scooch around just to get thru! This is horrible! And the Filipinos! Tabo! Tabo! Manang! Hay na ko! We need that law to make them all non citizens again! Hurry!

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

*not available in states that have banned online porn.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Imagine those VPNs just burning porn thru the cables. Imagine the size of their blue balls just waiting for a chance to see maybe some cleavage at church!

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The old 8th grade sex education curriculum in Orange County, while promoting abstinence, acknowledged that some students are sexually active. It provided information on how to prevent unintended pregnancy and protect against STDs if students engaged in sexual activity. This information has been deleted from the new curriculum.

The old Orange County 8th grade curriculum also included information about the various kinds of birth control, their efficacy, and whether or not they helped reduce the risk of STDs. This information has also been removed.

In Orange County's new 8th grade curriculum, there are no descriptions of the different forms of birth control and no explanation of which forms of birth control are effective in preventing the transmission of STDs. This is a particularly important issue in Florida, which is currently "reporting more HIV diagnoses than almost any other state."

These are the kinds of changes you get when you have people developing curriculum without actually understanding any of the evidence, and just going off vibes.

"No sex = no pregnancy, surely the kids will understand and follow our instructions on this!"

"No sex = no need for birth control, so why tell them about it?"

It baffles me how stupid some members of our society can be.

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've hear about New Hampshire before, but where is this New Florida supposed to be?

The ocean, sooner or later..

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 148 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The worst thing I ever read about the issues about destroying sexual education is that it also leaves children unable to actually describe any abuse, because they don't know what's going on, what anything is called, and what is and isn't a "good" touch.

I'm not saying Florida Republicans are in any way wanting that outcome, but you have to at least wonder why they're so concerned about this.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's by design. Republicans are child molestation pros

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

I'm saying this is exactly the outcome Republicans want.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I imagine that Florida is to Americans, what America is to the rest of the world.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did yall used to think we were generally pretty cool though off? I think that's the sad thing here, Florida is like the cousin you kinda liked before they got hardcore into meth. Like you aren't surprised they tried meth, they seemed the type, but they didn't seem the type to mug grandma at a family reunion before stealing your mom's Ritalin, but well here we are and now mom won't be able to focus for the rest of the month, grandma can't stop crying, and they just shot the cigarette pinata

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think Florida has been cool at any point in my lifetime. They started meth before I was born, and by the time I was old enough to form memories they were most well known for "Florida Man." You'd have to go back to the 80s to find a time when Florida was cool.

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Florida has only ever been a punchline for as long as I've been around.

There are many amazing things that came from Florida and are still in Florida right now. But as a package deal, I certainly haven't heard of a time where they've been above par.

Or would that technically be "below par"? Isn't being under par the objective? I don't know, I don't play golf. Florida's got acres of fucking golf courses, surely someone there could tell me the answer.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what earth is to the rest of the Galaxy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What remains is a discussion of the benefits of abstinence and a cursory review of various sexually transmitted diseases.

Oh hey, that’s the sex ed we got in my school. Along with at least 4 pregnant girls I knew of under 17 in a very small rural school. The youngest was 13.

If the people “teaching” us ever connected those facts, it wasn’t apparent to me.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They want more teen pregnancies. Teen pregnancies tend to keep the mother poor, and subsequently the child. That keeps them desperate and more likely to be desperate enough to take shitty, low paying jobs, or potentially even doing slave labor in a for profit prison.

It also puts strain on the rest of the family.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Wasn’t AI supposed to make everyone unemployed by now? Something doesn’t add up.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to think, 'oh, people against sex ed just don't understand the good things it does! Later first pregnancies, protection from abuse, std prevention...if they understood, of course they'd be on board!' Haha, oh younger me.

I still do think there are lots of people who come around, if some source they trust reaches them, but I was mistaken to think certain other people were actually against child abuse and teenage pregnancy.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

30 .... shit 40 years ago when I was a kid ... sex education came from kids who were one or two years older than you ... hustler magazine and porn videos.

I think I was about 20 before I properly understood what sex was and I had to learn it all on my own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I vaguely remember the "sex ed" video our Catholic elementary school showed as an optional parent/kid evening event. The most direct it got about sex was a line drawing of a cow and a bull, then a dotted line arrow appeared from the bull's crotch area to the cow's, as the narrator said, "The male inserts his penis into the vagina of the female..." then stuff about the sperm fertilizing the egg. We were left completely clueless until we figured out the details by trial and error in high school.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Man my catholic school made us label the vas deferens in 6th grade. Mind you they also told us condoms don't prevent the spread of hiv.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

my catholic school made us label the vas deferens in 6th grade

Hopefully not on yourself with marker lol

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Nah on the priest of course

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The look on your faces when you found out that you didn't even need cattle for it!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you don’t teach your kids, life will, and experience isn’t nearly so patient nor kind.

Also if we could please stop obsessing with children and sex in these regressive states.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Removing the anatomy portion of sex ed is absurd, but we'll just file it under the same "everything I don't like is porn" reasoning they've been using. And at least I can understand how someone can think that teaching about birth control only encourages sex.

But what the actual fuck can anyone say to defend removing any discussion about consent‽ I honestly can't understand it. There's literally no reason not to cover it unless you object to the idea that rape and molestation are bad.

What's next, teaching kids that strangers in vans have the best candy? That adults will often reward those who give special favors? The importance of keeping uncomfortable experiences a secret?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Comprehensive sex education prevents more abortions than bans. I know this. You know this. And red states know this. Their bans have nothing to do with protecting life. It's all about reintroducing women suffrage.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Suffrage means the right to vote. Women suffrage is a Good Thing, and can't be reintroduced because it already exists in the US.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

And American conservatives are starting to float opposition to it

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I think they meant "women's suffering"

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

This is how we get crap like "soaking", can't wait for what ever ludicrous thing is next.

load more comments
view more: next ›