this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
174 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

61425 readers
3995 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This isn't my app, it just seems super cool as a way to pull together your own social media and news.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

The interesting thing to me is that you can code and share your own feed sources. This means you can integrate APIs, or even scrape sites.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 41 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Ads and a subscription model are present FYI.

Edited for spelling.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Im not using one of these with ads, ill host my own and use the website before that, would have to be insanely convenient and polished, even then id wait for a one time purchase clone

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 1 points 9 hours ago

It has a lifetime subscription but it’s missing so many features I couldn’t imagine paying that right now. Well ever but specifically right now…lol

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 47 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

It looks great but man I hate subscriptions and $80 for a lifetime license is absurd.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago

There is no such thing as a lifetime license.

Any license only lasts as long as the person doesn't want to alter the deal.

(Speaking as a sublime text user who got shafted and switched to emacs)

[–] tkw8@lemm.ee 37 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

$80 for a lifetime subscription is reasonable for a well developed app without venture capital subsiding the cost.

Plexpass lifetime is $120.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

yep, migrated to emby a couple months ago. although I did use plex for long enough to get value out of the lifetime plex pass.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

any particular reason you chose emby over jellyfin?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

no Apple TV app and smaller QOL things like bulk editing of files.

[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 14 points 17 hours ago

$60 can buy you a lifetime license for the Affinity Designer 2, which is a fantastic alternative to Adobe’s Illustrator, which some people can’t live without. AFAIK, Serif isn’t backed by a venture capitalist as well. So, are you still happy paying $20 more for a social media app?

Like, look, I get that we should support devs for what they do, especially if they don’t take venture capitalist money to sell their products for cheap to gain market share. But this seems really overpriced. What are you getting with an $80 app for social media?

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

80$ goes so far with software, I could buy so much cool shit with years of development behind it

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Completely different services. What social media app has ever cost $80?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Ivory for Mastodon is $15/year
$80 would only buy you 5.33 years

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not paying for Ivory either. Out of curiosity does Ivory have adds for those who don't pay?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I don’t think so but I think it’s “read only”.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Software use to cost this much and much more in the 90s, and often did less (not working with a much of networked api calls, not integrating with a bunch of other platforms, etc) and wasn’t frequently updated.

It’s 25-30 years later.

People have lost touch with what paid software costs.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Shit was much harder vfx artists were paid a lot too, but they also were the mfs starting apple and pixar, they didnt have the tools/resources we have

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago

Developers didn't have access to mountains of open source code, online tutorials and stack overflow back then either. Compilers, like Turbo C, also used to be paid products.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I've been using Openvibe which is a similar app and haven't seen one add and doesn't have a subscription model. I understand development cost money but I agree with you.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Openvibe is backed by Automatic so zero chance it doesn't become shit. But you can just switch when it does, I suppose.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Just curios what do you mean by become shit? Adds and/or subscriptions or something else?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Sure, any number of ways they can claw value away from consumers.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Am I taking crazy pills or can you not reply to BlueSky and Mastodon post in Tapestry?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I can’t either, looks like this is just for reading.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 6 points 13 hours ago

That’s crazy, you can reply in Opevibe and Surf.Social and they want $80 for this?

[–] Hafty@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cool concept. Seems a bit pricey for what is essentially an RSS reader. UI looks kind of ugly.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago

100% although I like the UI but it’s crippled without those features mentioned. Openvibe and Surf offers the same concept and can do both those things.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand who this is for.

It’s not a good RSS client because it doesn’t offer any specialised features (pulling content beyond what’s in rss, proper reader view, caching etc).

It’s an awful microblogging platform client because you can’t see context or comments. So then maybe you could set up another account, otherwise you’re going to get every new shitpost in your Tapestry (ewww). Then you wonder why not use this account in Mastodon client when it can be a list and skip bothering with another app.

It’s not a good YouTube app or whatever else they implement. It’s not going to be a good everything app because better apps exist for individual services and this developer doesn’t seem to have capacity to implement even the basics.

It does offer some cool features when you have a bajillion news sources but then you’d be kidding yourself that this app will let you browse them all. Maybe you’ll set up some cool alerts for stuff you’ll see elsewhere anyway.

I might be missing the point but this is really undercooked for what they try to charge.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Think of "Google News", but for social media and RSS... Or Google Reader for all of those.

The point isn't to be able to comment and whatnot, but to get all the things you want updates on, in a single pane of glass, so to speak.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 2 points 10 hours ago

That seems like such a narrow use case. I’m not sure why making it usable would have hindered people who want to use it like that.

Not being able to reply or see threads are just wild design choices IMO.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I understand this much. I tried it and it was awful for the reasons stated above.

Reeder did a similar rebrand recently and it was similarly received. It looks pleasant (and way better than Tapestry) but doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny (same as Tapestry). I had to switch RSS app that I’ve been using since 1st gen iPod Touch so I’m a bit pissed ;) I understand Iconfactory had to reinvent itself because Musk killed Twitterific but this just doesn’t work and it’s been proven to not work already.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago

This is really cool. 👍

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 6 points 19 hours ago

This is great. I’ve really been enjoying OpenVibe but it’s not perfect so I’m looking forward to checking out another take on this.

[–] macstainless@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Been beta testing this as a Kickstarter backer for many months and it's one of my top iPhone apps. Iconfactory has done a real good job and I'll say that if you like the app, $80 for a lifetime purchase really will pay for itself after only a year of using it.

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You can’t reply! What am I missing?

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cool. Is there anything like this on android? Or desktop?

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

Thanks! I've not seen this before, gonna go look into it :)