this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
647 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
6344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It isn’t racist enough, so he has to take over and train it on nazi propaganda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 198 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

not even one-third of the valuation openai thinks they're worth (up to 340b). and still below what investors thought in 2022 (157b). src

i think this is old spice admitting that xAI is total bullshit and he's giving up on making his own.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I thought this was because he’s still pissy they cut him out, but I guess his reasons can be multifaceted

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elon’s $97.4B hostile takeover bid for OpenAI is less about “safety” and more about a billionaire’s corporate tantrum. The offer reeks of desperation—a laughable lowball for a company valued at $340B, dressed as altruism.

Altman’s clapback—“buy Twitter for $9.74B”—is the perfect middle finger to Musk’s flailing empire. Remember when X became a $44B dumpster fire? Now he wants to drag OpenAI into his orbit of mismanaged toys.

This feud isn’t about AI ethics—it’s two tech oligarchs weaponizing legal battles and PR stunts. Musk’s “open-source” crusade is safety theater while his own xAI hoards code. The only winner here? Lawyers billing hourly as the world burns.

[–] boramalper@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be clear (and as far as I understand), it’s not a hostile takeover bid because it cannot be: OpenAI is not a public company and thus doesn’t have a fiduciary duty to thousands to millions of shareholders but instead to a handful of big investors who can decide for themselves whether they want that Elon’s money or not. So this isn’t similar to what Twitter had been through but more like Elon teasing Altman I believe.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The distinction you’re making is valid but misses the forest for the trees. Whether OpenAI is public or not, Musk’s bid is a textbook power play, not a genuine offer. The lack of fiduciary duty doesn’t erase the intent—it amplifies it. This isn’t about shareholder obligations; it’s about Musk leveraging his wealth to reshape AI governance in his image.

Comparing this to Altman’s jab at Twitter isn’t apples-to-apples. Altman’s point was rhetorical, highlighting Musk’s track record of overpromising and underdelivering. The “open-source” crusade Musk touts is hollow when xAI remains proprietary.

This isn’t about legality or structure—it’s about influence and control. Dressing it up as altruism insults anyone paying attention.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hahah he really hates Altman's guts. Good. Love to see those two expend their energy on each other rather than on fucking all of us.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unfortunately, they can multitask

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Musk isnt very good at that. He seems to Godzilla's his way through one project at a time, while interns clean up behind him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately they can multitask

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You guys both posted it within a few seconds of each other judging by my app updating the time. Impressive.

[–] splinter@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, they can multitask

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He bought Twitter for 44 billion... and the US presidency for 290 million.

That is the single most dystopian shit I have ever heard. The idea that people and countries are so dirt cheap and companies are orders of magnitude more valuable is a thing that should damn their souls to hell.

You how bad this is affecting me? I've been an atheist and anti-death penality most of my life... Musk has for the past while made me think that the death penalty needs to be applied to people like him (and Israeli war criminals) and not to common crooks and common murderers. He is even making me want a hell to exist so people like him can burn in it.

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly same situation here. Every day I'm wanting to strangle him and all the other nazis and nazi enablers working in this government. An eternity of suffering would be the only way to approach the suffering of thousands of people through their entire lives that he and all these monsters are causing, not just to those living right now but who knows how generations following

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Exactly. It is like Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. It enshrined segregation as legal and was never over turned. It wouldn't be until 60+ years before segregation is overturned. That is literally a lifetime. And we all know that it was never really overturned, so it's effects are still shown.

Segregation was also expanded in the following decades that robbed black people of opportunities to grow generational wealth, in the wake of the decision and other racist events.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

and the US presidency for 290 million.

So, about a dollar per American.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everyone should've chipped in with a dollar and you'd have your own country! /s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shortly after the news was announced, Altman posted on X: “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”

If only their slapfight meant something good for the world. At least, I don't see everything collected in Musk's hands.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Lmao "Twitter"

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He can afford to pay twice the price of Twitter because he's using government money. Remember he barely swung the 44 billion for Twitter. Now he's buying something for more than double that? After putting code into the Treasury department computers to hide transactions?

Lmao.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah so he's again going to pay twice the amount of what it's worth to then run of off a cliff and make it worth 20% of it's real value within a years time?

Seriously, why do people still believe anything this scammer says?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Canigou@jlai.lu 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Where is the "hide Musk/DOGE/Trump related posts" button ?

EDIT : Found it ! (Damn, Lemmy is awesome 😊)

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Bro, I think you just wiped out your entire front page.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But remember, all of his wealth is only potential, not realized! He ackshually can't afford to make the world a better place!

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

The best and most affordable way for Elon Musk to "make the world a better place" would be to drop dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xuderis@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

I guess grok isn’t doing so well.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is corporate trolling. Open AI is trying to go public soon, and Elon did this to fuck with that.

Massive oversimplification but basically: In the United States, you are required to take the best offer when selling a company, unless you can argue in court that you had reasons not to sell to whomever placed the highest bid. Because of this offer, as open AI attempts to go public, they will have to either to be close to Elon's bid, forced to sell to him, go to court and fight him ther, or be forced to remain private.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

YES!

Finally a way to destroy the AI hype.

Maybe the man is good for something besides wasting oxygen after all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As long as he pays for it, and not the US taxpayer....

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How the fuck would we know? He has access to pretty much everything and has shown absolute contempt for the other branches that can stop him. He could drain social security, and no one would be the wiser till payments stopped.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 week ago (10 children)

even if openai are assholes, chatgpt is still useful for things as long as you dont put too much trust in it. If that fucker buys it they will turn it into racist shitspewing garbage. Without it, regular people will have no decent or easy way to utilize ai and this new tech will benefit only the rich who will use it to oppress us even worse.

Stinky isnt an idiot, i wish he was. Anything he buys he can and will use to cause harm to us. So this would be bad for us all.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

OpenAI's Yahoo! moment. In a decade it'll be worthless.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 week ago

Couldn't even pay for twitter himself, that broke ass

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"NaziAI" has a real ring to it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was,” Musk said in a statement provided by his lawyer Marc Toberoff to The Wall Street Journal. “We will make sure that happens.”

I'll believe that when I see it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

How to become a millionaire: Start with 97.4 Billion.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

OK, what's the fediverse alternative for ChatGPT?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Running the models locally.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›