this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
189 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

I love my Toilet Paper-Link router. It's the only one I've ever owned that didn't start randomly losing the internet connection after two years. I don't know why every router starts acting up like that; I've had issues with literally every brand except this one.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I can’t wait to get a hold of a bunch of cheap TP Link routers. Those things run OpenWRT like champs.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 31 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't care if China steals my data or uses my router as a vector for a DOS attack at this point. My fascist nation already has domestic back doors to spy on me if I was interesting enough. My opinion of China is roughly the same as my opinion of my own red white and blue shithole, about as low as you can go. In fact, their regular people on the street seem a hell of a lot more prosocial and EMPATHETIC than I've ever seen here in the US going by Rednote. I'm on nobody's side geopolitically because nobody is on my side.

Besides, we destroyed ourselves already. Checkmate CCP! Have fun spying on the ash heap. Spoilers: we're largely poorly educated here by design, so enjoy the stream of "...evolution is just a theory science is fake education is a scam pull yourself by your bootstraps stop virtue signaling it's not greed I'm rationally self-interested... "

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In a fucked up way I lol’d at this. If I put on my tinfoil hat I’d say the USA is encouraging China to “spy” on us so they have to absorb the brainrot. Poor bastards

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe China isn’t the bad guy. They have goals. Goals are good. We’re mainly into destruction and extracting capital. Wild thought, maybe we’ve never been the good guys. :o

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think goals are inherently good... Hitler had goals...

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I believe you’re referencing Hitler to the incorrect country. China’s moving towards socialism, very slowly. The US is going straight fash at the speed of light.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Sickusername btw. Ever seen them live? One of the best shows I saw in the few surrounding years (of the year I saw them)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Oh but all the US hardware with spyware from the NSA/FBI is just fiiiiiiiiiine.

As always US wants the data, they just don't want anyone else to have it.

It's also a laugh for them to say "fuck you consumers you don't get to" when the federal government already fucking blew it with SolarWinds.

Personal opinion this is much ado about nothing. In other words this article is baseless fear-mongering.

Trump is a bigger national security concern than fucking TP-Link and no one in power is seriously talking about removing him.

His economic moves will devalue the US Dollar and put it at risk as a reserve currency. Who is gonna step in? China.

But boo hoo, we should ban TP-Link! What a fucking joke. If you're really "worried" about China, get rid of Trump yesterday.

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump is a bigger national security concern than fucking TP-Link and no one in power is seriously talking about removing him.

There is an abstract ironic beauty to this.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To secure US networks, start by kicking Musk out of government systems.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Seriously, DOGE could be literally installing ransomware that kicks off if anyone tries to block them... They were hooking up random fucking servers right into secured government systems and were given write access at some of those government systems.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago

"the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced."

https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-bfs-doge-insider-threat/

He is like Spyware or just crappy insecure code become manifest in human form.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As always US wants the data, they just don’t want anyone else to have it for free

I guarantee you that American data is going to Chinese companies. Temu has your data. Alibaba has your data. Bilibili has your data. They're just getting it by purchasing from American data centers.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is, the complaint about China spying on people boils down to piracy?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's the thing American IP companies care about the most.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Three separate government departments are investigating TP-Link, so someone either tipped the Fed off and you (and the public) know nothing, or this is simply a witch hunt.

Since I know for a fact I can't trust anyone commenting anywhere on the internet as a credible source, I'm hoping those departments who once were independent of the Executive control and free of Trump corruption and are now filled with human excrement yes-men MAGA regarded morons, i will hold my anger until we know more.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 1 points 4 hours ago

The US government has something of a credibility crisis, doesn't it? (And I don't think it started with Trump, though he makes it worse.)

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

It looks just like the Tik Tok ban to me. Racist/Nationalist nonsense that doesn't solve the actual underlying problem, which is lack of regulation in the US

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The best that they've got is that TP-Link is competitive on pricing. Oh no they're not bilking consumers and still make enough money to function, that must mean something shady is happening! Or maybe they're just a company who isn't all-in on ripping off consumers for overpriced tech gear?

Also, the argument that some models force you to log in, sure, if you're a technically un-inclined dingus. If you are technically inclined, literally nothing is stopping you from installing something like OpenWRT/DD-WRT/FreshTomato on your TP-Link router and bypassing the login requirement entirely by replacing the firmware with an open source variant (note: DD-WRT isn't actually fully open like OpenWRT and FreshTomato). The point being that their two major arguments for why TP-Link are dangerous are defeated pretty damn simply.

If I can avoid logging in by installing fresh firmware of my own, and the only other major argument they have is that they're selling at lower prices then competitors... well, that's pretty weak tea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it boils down to... who do you want seeing your data?

The Chinese? or the Americans?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TP-Link has a bad history of significant security vulnerabilities that have to either be gross negligence or intentional backdoors. Consumer router firmware is notoriously neglected in the grand scheme of tech, but TP-Link is exceptionally bad. Your average and even most above average techies probably have no idea unless they follow security releases or live in the security world. I personally wouldn't know much if anything about them if not for some YT content I watch about software and security. I don't love blanket blocking of stuff, but this one I feel is necessary to help protect an ignorant population.

I 100% agree with the sentiment that Trump is way more dangerous, because he is, but the two issues can be addressed (or not unfortunately) at the same time. If our reps won't stop Trump, and not going to be upset over he small wins that we do get.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So, say I have a POE outdoor router that is TP-link. It is wired to my main router and is the network for outdoor cameras. How bad an idea is this?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

If you're just running it in AP mode and extending from your base router you will be better off than if it's your WAN device. I don't know enough about these exploits to know how they are executed, so I can't give you a solid answer, but I think it's best to err on the side of caution when it comes to your data security.

If you're fairly tech savvy and willing to put in a little effort, you can flash the firmware on the TP-Link with something open source like openWRT and that would eliminate any exploits directly caused by their coding. I haven't done this in years, but I'm sure there are plenty of guides to walk you through this. It would require resetting up your network, but you'd need to do that if you replaced anyway.

Personally, I would replace the device with something higher quality. I don't have recommendations for you, but I'm sure there are some resources you can find with security minded device recommendations. For "pro-sumer" grade stuff, where it's better than your off the shelf options but not enterprise grade, I've heard Unify is a good option, but it's complicated and expensive.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have any links to the alleged bad history? I couldn't find anything, partly because the recent political theatre makes it hard to be informed.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here is the main video I watched that breaks down a recent ish CVE and at the end he gives some thoughts on TP-Link, D-link, and another and just his professional security opinion on them.

It is only one source, but I think it's a strong one.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand why they're considering a ban. People should be changing the default password on their router. If they aren't and they leak information that isn't theirs, tough shit, fine them. If they leak their own information, let them deal with the consequences.

[–] yabai@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There are so many people who just don't get tech though. I was just at my buddy's patents house, probably early 60s, and they have a random default SSID and password. It's like 15 digits long. Secure as can be. If they really bothered to type that in on all their devices, I'm thinking they were probably incapable of changing it through the software.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Or they just didn't know how. Which is a distinct possibility. Some devices these days even let you share the Wi-Fi password through QR code or similar. So you don't have to enter it until every device.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago

Please yes, I look forward to cheaper routers due to oversupply.

[–] CrystalRainwater@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dumb policy but still fuck tp link routers. They never took security remotely seriously to the point where their products are known for being a good entry point into learning about exploiting embedded devices.

Don't really care or think the government spyware concerns are particularly legitimate but they definitely aren't secure products to have on your network

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 1 day ago

You sure you're not confusing TP-Link with D-Link? The latter has been the common attack surface I'm familiar with, and the former has been a staple for enthusiasts and as a tool for pentesters.

There's quite a few TP-Link Models that can be flashed with open source firmware. The ones I helped friends and family with seemed to get software updates consistently after being discontinued.

This isn't an all out endorsement, but I've certainly seen worse.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Every single consumer SOHO router is just a data mining security clusterfuck these days, brand is irrelevant. The only way to really get away from it is to run your own SBC or NUC with a wifi card and shit.

They make mini PCs with five Ethernet ports that are perfect for this sort of thing.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mikrotik is probably OK IMO.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

probably, lol. they don't even support openwrt

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

what do you base that probably upon?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's a European company, they are widely deployed and well regarded.
Their hardware is decent and well priced. I don't think if anyone else can provide this type of hardware at that price point.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Key word: consumer. You won’t find a single router on store shelves that the layman is not getting all of their data collected through.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago

GL.Inet sells routers that run openwrt out of the box. I'm not claiming they're guaranteed to not be modified to collect data, but just giving an example that there are consumer grade products out there that are better options, you just need to look for them.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Banning TP-Link routers isn't going to do a damn thing to solve the problem of insecure routers, SOHO or otherwise. Too many people and companies set shit up and then ignore it until it breaks and under these conditions routers are always going to become insecure given a long enough timeline.

Fire up Shodan and see how many discontinued Cisco ASAs are out there. Hell you can probably still find some Cisco PIX boxes even though they went away nearly twenty years ago! Those aren't people doing that, those are COMPANIES.

The problem here isn't the brand or even the silicon that brand uses. It's with the utter lack of management (including EoL replacement) by the people using the damn things.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

His economic moves will devalue the US Dollar and put it at risk as a reserve currency. Who is gonna step in? China.

China doesn’t want to become the world currency, but they do want a BRICS currency. This will take years, though.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Should we worry? About Trump's reciprocal tariffs which are going to plunge the world into the greatest recession since the 1930's, Trump breaking the post war Western alliance and making partner of Putin's Russa, or Trump dismantling of the Constitutional underpinnings of all American juris prudence? Oh, you're talking about some fucking router.

load more comments
view more: next ›