this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
233 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gen Z is choosing not to drive::Less Gen Z Americans own a driver's license than previous generations, according to consulting firm McKinsey.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 138 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Are they choosing, or can't they afford to own a car with insurance and petrol costs going through the roof?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

It may be a choice for many. I only got a car recently at age 26, even though I could always afford one (or ask my parents at an earlier age). There's also a decline in driver's licenses and the desire to have/drive/maintain a vehicle. Frankly, I'm not sure I'd have one myself if public transportation and sidewalks were reliable in my area.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yea. I think there’s genuine generational shift here. Which in many ways makes sense. I never heard a negative word from my elders/parents about cars, while I and many of my friends and partners have had one and arrived at fairly critical to down right negative views about cars and driving.

Why it would be generational strikes me again as fairly obvious.

Traffic congestion has only gotten worse over time. The freedom machine ideal of the car has therefore very much faded. And things like traffic jams and the general stress of driving and parking etc are the sorts of thing that are hard to unsee once you’ve seen them. The damage they do in destroying or preventing pedestrian friendly areas is similar. The whole climate thing shifts the value proposal again.

And then there’s the pure generational factor too. Cars are relatively new. It makes sense that they’ve been on some hype curve this whole time, peaking with the boomers. Now it feels obvious we’ve overdone it and relied on them too much. Watching plenty of cars scramble to find a car park or get stuck in traffic, each bearing a single driver/passenger while taking up 5-10 square meters … again hard to unsee.

Once you’ve seen or even lived a life without all that noise, they’re no longer the must haves they were for the past decades.

[–] jerrythegenius@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This also depends on where you live, I'm gen z and I have a license (no car tho, saving money for it) but since I don't live in a big city a car's still important to get around (there is a mediumish-sized city ~15 min drive away, but I'm in australia so everything's real spread out)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] papaya@possumpat.io 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep. My parents offered to buy my gen Z brother a car, and he asked for an e-bike instead. I (a millenial) also choose to not have a car for both environmental reasons and just... not wanting to drive and deal with traffic and car maintenance and whatnot. Thankfully we live in a city whose public transportation's getting better by day.

[–] JDubbleu@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My partner and I live in Silicon Valley and it's cheaper for us to rent a car when we need it than to own one. We'd use it maybe twice a month so rentals just make more sense. We're moving to San Francisco soon though and at that point we'll likely never own a car and just transit everywhere.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I saw a 1998 corolla for sale on the street for $5000. The basic buy-in for anything these days it insane. This “market rate” shit needs to die.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Toyota Corollas are really popular though. For a Kia of the same age the previous owner will pay you 5k if you take it off their hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The article's metric seems to be whether or not they own a driver's license, not a car. So whether or not they can afford to own a car isn't really a part of this article's dataset, although they do touch on why they don't own a car in the article as well.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My son is getting gifted an electric car from a family friend.

He still doesn't really give a shit about getting a license, it's crazy to me.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I think there's also the issue of where do kids have to go hang out anymore?

By and large, malls are dead/dying, and some don't even allow unsupervised kids anymore.

Movies are expensive. Restaurants are expensive. Concerts are expensive (if you're lucky enough to live somewhere with easy access to concert venues, if you're in the suburbs you probably have an uphill battle trying to convince your parents to let you go wandering around the city unsupervised to go to a concert) Arcades basically don't even exist anymore.

They can barely even go hang out in a park without being harassed by some Karen or the cops, and of course parks usually close at dusk and kind of depend on the weather being decent so in many places there's a good chunk of the year where parks are undesirable.

You can hang out at your friends' houses, but depending on your area there's a decent chance that they may be in walking or biking distance so no need for a car, and if you're just going to be hanging around the house, not a big deal for Mom or Dad to drop you off/pick you up, not like you're going to really need a car while you're there, you got nowhere to go anyway. And of course we get some parents these days who are really weird about their kids going over to other people's homes, which leaves staying home and hanging out online.

About the only thing I can think of that I used to do as a kid that might still be accessible for kids and might necessitate them having their own car is to go hang out at the local comic/game shop to play magic, d&d, etc. Because most of them are pretty cool about people just coming to hang out, but even that could really be a "hey parental unit, can I get a ride?" kind of thing.

Plus, if you have a tight group of friends you always hang out with, you may only need a couple drivers. Even going back to when I was a teen/young adult, a lot of my friends didn't have a license and many of them who did didn't have their own car or couldn't count on borrowing their parents' car. I know the core group I hung out with was probably around 6-10 people, and one other guy and I did 99% of our driving whenever we went to do something because we were the ones with cars. Probably up until I was about 23 I spent a lot of time picking friends up and giving them rides places because I had a car and they didn't.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I've heard this called "the death of the third place". The first place is home, the second place is work, the third place is everything else. It used to be that people could hang out at bars, malls, bowling alleys, etc. for not astronomical prices. It's gotten too expensive to be out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 90 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Just like they're "choosing" not to own houses either I guess

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you work hard and save up, you could live in a nice van down by the river!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The unit of measure in this article is whether or not they have a driver's licence, not a car...I'm pretty sure even gen Zers can afford a driver's license, if they actually wanted it. Not having a driver's licence is very much a choice, to a much higher degree than owner a car (or house)

[–] Dlolor@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but why get a licence if you know you won't have a car any time soon?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Because you don't want to drive privately but for work. Where you need a drivers license.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because it's convenient to be able to drive a car? There are lots of cases when you may borrow a car to do things. Teenagers might borrow their parents car to do errands and stuff.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

As someone who has absolutely no desire to ever own or drive a car, I'm getting my licence based purely on the off chance that I might need to anyway (but I'd probably just hire for a day).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In places like Finland it costs over a thousand euros to get your driver's license. That's less than a car obviously but not nothing either

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah it costs around 2k Euros where I live, which is enough to also buy a small beater...but this article is US-focused only, and it's significantly cheaper to get a licence in the US, hence my comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yuki@kutsuya.dev 15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It costs about 400K to 500K where I live to buy a house that used to be around 150K 30 years ago. Times are fucked

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

While wages stagnated

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 75 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

They're choosing not to drive for the same reason they're choosing to be more thrifty, choosing not to go to college, choosing to live with their parents longer, and choosing not to buy homes. See if you can find the common denominator.

[–] Masamune@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes, I see the problem. They don't know where their bootstraps are!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] runwaylights@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Quite interesting to see them trying to live without a car in a society where cars are such a necessity. I live in the Netherlands and many of my friends don't have a license or own a car, but over here the infrastructure is build around accessibility for people without a car. For example, I live in a small town and I can hop on my bike and reach 5 supermarkets within 15 minutes. But it's interesting to see people trying out different modes of transportation where it's not so easy.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The article mentions hailed mobility, like Uber and Lyft, are the alternative uses. It's still cars, but not their car.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering how much cars cost I wonder if ride shares are even more expensive.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Depends on how often you drive.

there's a lot of variables, but figure owning a car costs 300-400 a month minimum...

If you don't need it everyday for work I can easily see ride apps/taxis being much cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

It's very easy when you don't have enough money to buy a car.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

cities that are built around cars are a scam

[–] User79185@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 10 months ago

I assume lots of Gen Z can only afford like 2 liters of gas anyways let alone a car...

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I mean I owned a car from the ages of 18 to 25, never had a claim.

I'm 27 now and looked at getting a car for the odd time I need one and and insurance premiums are an average of £1100 to £1700. Why bother? I'll just continue to get the train

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (10 children)

My family keeps pressuring me to learn how to drive. I still say no, and will keep doing so for the rest of my life basically. I seriously do not wanna contribute to pollution and congestion.

In my country you're expected to know how to drive as early as 15, way before you even get your permit. I say fuck that.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Because these days there's a dialogue about whether driving is economically worthwhile, moral, or even fun. There used to be no talk about that, and so the only question was whether you could afford a beater or a status symbol.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Car ownership is more expensive than it used to be + a greater proportion of young people live in cities than they used to.

[–] scrappydoo@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Try living in Singapore, where it now costs SGD146,000 (USD106,000) just to have the right to own a car for ten years (a Certificate of Entitlement).

To be clear, that fee doesn’t actually buy you a car, it’s simply the cost of being allowed to own a car. For ten whole years, then you need to buy another one.

“A new standard Toyota Camry Hybrid costs around S$250,000 [~USD186,500] in Singapore, which includes the cost of a COE and taxes. That is about six times more expensive than in the US.”

It’s certainly one way to encourage the public to use mass transit (which is pretty good, luckily!).

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67014420

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Singapour is also a country reduced to a city, so that certainly makes transportation easier. The US is on the opposite of the spectrum.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Singapores population density is 232 times higher than in USA

[–] adrian783@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't use the whole USA, should compare with metro areas

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

All the articles have been written on millennial's so now they're going to sub in Gen Z.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago
[–] knoopx@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

40 and I move by electric longboard. Fuck cars.

[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Please done hurt boomers feelings.

load more comments
view more: next ›