this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
250 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3222 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"That’s why Ukie strongly supports the use of robust classification systems like PEGI across all platforms, including those hosting adult or experimental content," the statement reads. "We believe payment providers and platforms alike should have confidence in trusted age rating systems and the enforcement mechanisms behind them."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 128 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Steam doesn't have to, you fuckwits. Collectively shouting your beliefs across the world and forcing others to bend to your religion isn't worth a response. Go fuck yourselves.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

Because of course they're fucking TERFs.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

How to defeat collective shout? A collective even louder shout.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 101 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Collective Shout, the anti-p*rnography pressure group

Did they seriously censor their own article, on their own website

[–] ushmel@piefed.world 15 points 2 days ago

Conservatives are always triggered by porn references

Collective Shit lol

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, hate it, but that sort of censorship is to bypass filters. Am old, used to use pr0n.

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I do like me some good prawns from time to time.

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Archer@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why talk to them at all? They don’t give a shit, “Jesus” “told them” to do what they’re doing

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Because talking is legal.

You shouldn't bombard those people with emails or phone calls or order pizza without toppings/cheese. Don't harass them and make their life miserable, don't ruin something they enjoy. Don't use OSINT to find more about them and certainly don't ask "where is your god now?" when they break down crying. Don't clog their systems with trashdata. Just don't raid them.

Talk with them in a civilized manner. Look at human history and you will see that every conflict can be settled if you are just willing to use words and nothing else.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You cannot reason with religious extremists. They believe they have the one true view of the world and nothing will convince them otherwise. They believe they are fulfilling gods wishes.

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

I'm not proposing to reason with them.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

🤣 Funny people replying to you completely missing the point.......

People, read again and turn on your brain.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, make their lives hell within the confines of the law. They aren't going to listen so it's a way better use of your time to fuck with them. Make them feel uncomfortable in the world because they do not belong.

[–] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look at human history and you will see that every conflict can be settled if you are just willing to use words and nothing else.

An admirable sentiment, but I feel like you and I read very different history books.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or the two of you have very different ideas in how to read text as sarcasm or honest opinions.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Eh, the quoted portion of the comment is too on the nose to be read as honest imo.

[–] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago

That was 100% a "whoosh" on my part, had just rolled out of bed and brain wasn't firing on all cylinders yet.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You dropped this

/s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Just register their contact information to spam services, like any sane person would do.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 57 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why do payment processors have to be concerned with age ratings at all?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Because THEY decided that THEIR opinions are better than everyone else's, so YOU have to listen to THEM, willingly or not.

Something something free speech and all that jazz.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Because nobody will ban that legally, and people paying for adult stuff themselves naturally have made a decision.

So these people (the Russian word is pidor) are trying to sneak a block someplace else.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They probably are worried about litigation, and shareholder profits. It's always about shareholder profits.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Nah, neither take works for 'em. Litigation? Being neutral bypasses all threats of bias. Profits? Porn is the only reason the internet took off as a profitable venture.

I'd bet some top dogs bowed to a little pressure for fear of bad publicity. That's how these tiny religious groups threaten. That's all the juice they got. And who's going to stand up and say, "Nah. Fuck yourself. We want our porn."

Well, I guess we all did stand up! (Do I still need to make calls, or is this thing done?)

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Backass preachers out in Oklahoma getting high and stoned on their own aroma.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TIL Oklahoma is in Australia.

It's a line from Jessie Welles "Certain"

https://youtu.be/ptX2ilHYpCk

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine sending 4k emails to a company of only a few hundred employees

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagine 4k people sending 4k emails to 6 employees

https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team

They, understandably, don't list their emails but I doubt they're impossible to find

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is it doxxing to post contact information for a public company? If so mods I'm sorry please don't ban me

Email: volunteers@collectiveshout.org or help@collectivevoice.com
Phone: +61 1300 146 987
Fax: +61 3 9815 9201
Mailing Address: PO Box 2451, Taylors Lakes, Victoria 3038, AU

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Definitely a Christian organisation they have a fax machine. Keeping up with the Joneses I see.

Now to waste their toner. I'm sending them my very important white text on a black background complaint, sent 4,000 times

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Send them the most fucked up guro hentai pages one can find!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you, I might use it for social engineering reasons.

[–] redti@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

The "Movement Director" posted her email address on this public Instagram reel as melinda@tankerdreist.com

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Cens+rship g+ne t++ f+cking f+r.

That article is shit to read. What's the point in censoring words?

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Likely search engine ranking. The internet is getting worse every fucking day.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Surfing porn on Google vs. Bing is an eye opening experience.

Google: "Fuck it all up. We don't want to be seen as a porn engine."

Microsoft: "How do we beat Google in search?!"

"Make porn pics and images easy?"

Worked!

But then you get weird shit. One day searching "tiny titties" gets you no NSFW results, the next it's flooded with 9yo Russian kids. "Flat chested"? Meh, one day it's "flats", the shoes, the next, 9yo Russian kids again. Fuck me. I like little titties, OK?! I just want to see them on women. Preferably "asian amateur lesbian cosplay tiny titty white lingerie face sitting lesdom wedding dress" kinda women. Is that too much to ask?! I was told this was the future. :(

[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Do search engines not want articles about porn or do they just don't like the word? Because substituting one letter doesn't do shit if you want to obscure what you're talking about.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Because it's bad words, sniff.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What are they going to do next? Force high class escorts to stop doing their job?

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Hell yeah. Now let’s the rest of us ignore those taints as well