this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
388 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

75551 readers
3245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 59 minutes ago

Rule #868: As an Evil CEO, I will make a point of holding at least three rehearsals to prevent having egg on my face.

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Watching tech bros clumsily hawk their "revolutionary society changing tech!" while they look like fools is hysterical.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

They're chasing that one moment in the early aughts when what they had actually blew peoples minds.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 7 points 4 hours ago

Given what happened (it skipping to the next step in the recipe), this was 100% "prerecorded AI" and they started on the wrong track.

[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Maybe be can ask the twins for help since he stole their entire platform anyways lol! What a douche!

[–] hotdogcharmer@lemmy.world 47 points 8 hours ago

God I wish this dork would fuck off already, along with the rest of the AI bullshit currently making investors and other business-wankers the world over cum themselves dry. It's fucking embarrassing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

At this point in his presentation, you might assume Zuckerberg would leave nothing to chance. But when it came time to demonstrate the Ray-Ban MetaDisplay’s unique new wristband, he opted against using slides and decided to try it live.

The wristband is what he called a “neural interface” – in a genuinely remarkable feat of technology, it allows you to type through minimal hand gestures, picking up on the electrical signals going through your muscles. “Sometimes you’re around other people and it’s, um, good to be able to type without anyone seeing,” Zuckerberg told the crowd. The pairing of glasses and wristband is, in short, a stalker’s dream.

Jesus christ.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The pairing of glasses and wristband is, in short, a stalker’s dream.

Ha. The buyer thinks they are the stalker

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago

The guy became a billionaire from a ‘hot or not’ college website…

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The wristband is what he called a “neural interface” – in a genuinely remarkable feat of technology, it allows you to type through minimal hand gestures, picking up on the electrical signals going through your muscles.

That would be genuinely a piece of hardware I might adopt if it's actually working as well as normal keyboard with touch typing. And obviously it has to work locally like any HID without sending everything I type to Zuck or someone else.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago

From all reports it works amazingly well.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry. All your data belong to zuck.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I can wait until someone else than Zuck(r) offers something better.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

I can wait until someone else than Zuck® offers something better.

We said that about the Portal. The successor to the PortalTV isn't going to replace the units I have in the field.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

Oh a new kind of advanced glasses, does it zoom or auto adjust to your prescription?

Reads article

Wait are they seriously trying google glass again? Why is it always the solution looking for a problem people the same as the supply side people. They don’t understand that demand is the real driver.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 154 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Very good and entertaining article

To a layperson, at least, it seems that consumer technology has long since entered an era of solutions in search of problems – particularly troubling at a time when the world is facing so many genuinely intractable crises. As entertaining as it is to watch our tech overlords flounder on stage, it raises bigger questions, such as: who exactly asked for this, beyond the billionaires cashing in? And: can we just not?

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 98 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

"can we just not?"

I feel this deep in my soul. Every day. Multiple times a day.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

It's bleak because of how hard this stuff is being pushed.

I got to laugh off the Metaverse because it flopped long before it could be forced down my throat. I looked askance at Crypto, but broadly avoided it without consequence. Now I've vendors injecting AI into their tech support service, and it isn't something I can wave away anymore.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen several "creators" pointing to AI overviews as "evidence" of things without ever fact-checking them (because if you were interested in facts you wouldn't bother with them anyway). I have family and friends send me AI-generated bullshit day in and day out.

It's especially infuriating when they send me "but ChatGPT says..." about something I'm literally an expert in. Like I do this all day every day and you're taking the word of a chatbot over me.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I hate when people do that. The robot is wrong! All the freaking time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 11 points 9 hours ago

I think of it as the Juicero era. Everything needs to be a subscription, with an app, selling your data and is barely functional. And in a society where the basics are getting more difficult. It's like selling more convenience to people in the upper floors of the Maslow's hierarchy of needs, while many people struggle to just get housing, heating, food and health.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It made him look like an idiot, but the question is did it do that on purpose? or is it just worthless trash?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 6 hours ago

If the stranglehold billionaires have on the world begins to diminish, I'll start to suspect it's been on purpose. Until then, they're just fucking idiots who made worthless trash.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Talked to a guy recently that claimed ChatGPT has "an IQ of over 300". Laughed hard, he got mad at me laughing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 34 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

Ask him how many "R"s are in Strawberry

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

How many pounds of carbon did that answer produce?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Look, two Rs is accurate as long as you accept that AI knows 'what you really mean' and you should have just prompted better.

[–] SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca 26 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That drives me mad. "Oh, you don't find AI that useful for developement? You should learn how to talk to it.". Wasn't that the point, that it would understand me?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 61 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

The last 5% aren't a nice bonus. They are everything. A 95% self driving car won't do. Giving me random hallucinations when I try to look up important information won't do either even if it just happens 1 out of 20 times. That one time could really screw me so I can't trust it.

Currently AI companies have no idea how to get there yet they sell the promise of it. Next year, bro. Just one more datacenter, bro.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

I get to ride in lots of different cars as part of my job, and some of the new ones display the current speed limit on the dash. It is incorrect quite regularly. My view is if you can't trust it 100% of the time you can't trust it at all and you might as well turn it off. I feel the same about a.i.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 49 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

People tell me the hallucinations aren't a big deal because people should fact check everything.

  1. People aren't fact checking
  2. If you have to fact check every single thing you're not saving any time over becoming familiar with whatever the real source of info is
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Worse, since generating a whole bunch of potentially correct text is basically effortless now, you've got a new batch of idiots just "contributing" to discussions by leaving a regurgitated wall of text they possibly didn't even read themselves.

So not only those are not fact checking, when you point that you didn't ask for a LLM's opinion, they're like "what's the problem? Is any of this wrong?" Because it's entirely your job to check something they copy-pasted in 5 seconds.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

So many posts on on social media are obviously AI generated and it immediately makes me disregard them but I'm worried about later stages when people make an effort to mask it. Prompt it to generate text without giveaways like dashes. Have intentional mistakes or a general lack of proper structure and punctuation in there and it will be incredibly hard to tell.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My friend told me that one of her former colleagues, wicked smart dude, was talking to her about space. Then he went off about how there were pyramids on Mars. She was like, "oh ... I'm quite caught up on this stuff and I haven't heard of this info. Where can I find this info?" The guy apparently has been having super long chats with whatever LLMand thinks that they're now diving into the "truth" now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

99% won't do when the consequences of that last 1% are sever.

There's more than one book on the subject, but all the cool kids were waving around their copies of The Black Swan at the end of 2008.

Seems like all the lessons we were supposed to learn about stacking risk behind financial abstractions and allowing business to self-regulate in the name of efficiency have been washed away, like tears in the rain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›