this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
1178 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

18344 readers
935 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 224 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, I'm sure they wouldn't give encryption keys away.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

~~Vulnerable~~ Susceptible

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 187 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they're less "vulnerable" and more "fragile"

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

"Afraid of any sort of accountability"

[–] railway692@piefed.zip 170 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh? Are we giving them privacy?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, maybe it would be in our interests to make all government communications public access. If it isn't a matter happening outside our borders, have it open. Maybe a classification for certain discussions that requires they be released in a timely manner, and when reviewed by a 3rd party if any information is attempted to be hidden they are immediately removed from their position and an investigation starts as to whether the offense should be criminal.

The timely manner would have to be monitored as in "we are going to performing a drug raid" they get a warrant that allocates them 2 days to have discussions pertaining to that topic, organize and execute it. Then release all communications immediately following. If they don't believe they can perform it in that time they need to submit it in their warrant request as to the reason why, time period, and date the information will be made public.

If we wrote strict laws on it, the judges would be held accountable for giving out warrants brazenly, and the executive branch would be kept in check by such

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe we should consider some sort of informational freedom act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 129 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Federated solutions which can't be stopped, self hosted, and available via Fdroid.

Only real answer.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 94 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Until Google revokes publishing privileges for side-loading applications. I think we'll have to go further and get used to making PWAs and regular websites.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (19 children)

side-loading

You mean "installing normally." "Sideloading" is fucking anti-property-rights loaded language.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

Good point. Wild how these ghouls have normalized their bullshit language.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 108 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh no, vulnerable 🥺 they need DEI? They need to be a protected class? 🥺

Surveillance is suddenly wrong when it's the peasants surveiling wannabe samurai? 🥺

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Can I just be "that guy" and point out the CEO of Google is "Sundar Puchai"?

Who do you think Trump is coming for, you fucking idiot? It's not guys like me named "David".

I hate this. I hate that they are targeting "minorities", or Hispanics, or Indian folks... But many people in charge who are part of these groups don't even care. They think they are special. You're money doesn't make you immune, you complete goddamn waste of oxygen.

We're trying to fucking help you. Stop condemning fellow human beings for the sake of profits. You are damning your children, and your family. You are selling them for gains. We hate you, and so do your children.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The irony is so rich.

To anyone that had doubts about governments putting restrictions on app stores, here is your proof. The level of power the current situation grants this duopoly is excessive and dangerous.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought we had all the proof we needed when Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai were snuggling up to Trump at dinners and the inauguration

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago

Calling masked, armed, armored thugs and terrorists with a disregard for the law a "vulnerable group" is a bit thick, isn't it?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 week ago (9 children)

aaand that's why we need to be able to install apps without their vetting.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The agents who implement state violence are not a group. They're agents of the state.

And now Google is directly collaborating with an oppressive autocratic regime.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Was ever any doubt who corporate America would side with?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 51 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Someone recommended Kagi in another thread yesterday and that night I finally became 100% google free. Search was the last big hurdle. I was literally the biggest google fanboy. I had google home devices, google wifi, I wanted all their devices, had all their services, everything was set up and integrated. De-googling was fucking hard but I did it and I'm super proud and I've learned so much about how tech works setting up my replacement services and devices. Fuck you Google.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Google says a group of masked fascists kidnapping children from their beds is a "vulnerable group".

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

To be fair, they did set expectations when they got rid of the "don't be evil" moto.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 44 points 1 week ago (9 children)

For the rest of my life I will never forget that Apple and Google went out of their way to defend and protect the Nazi SS of our time.

Absolutely fucking evil and unforgivable.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (6 children)

If you ever want to know why capitalism turns into fascism, look into how many companies willingly and knowingly did business with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.

IBM made computers to help the Holocaust, because the Nazis could pay for the service of the machines to be built.

Google is just a modern IBM.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is exactly why sideloading is very very important.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago
[–] collar@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Ah yes... the guys with masks, guns, the backing of the president, and virtually unlimited federal government resources are a "vulnerable group"

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Heil Agent Orange 🍊🧡

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 27 points 1 week ago
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

~~Don’t~~ be evil.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

Do not let Google escape this, ever. Cancel all payments to them. YouTube Premium, YouTube subscriptions, etc.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Why dont you stupid Americans organize or something?"

They won't let us. We're trying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're totally vulnerable! Just aim for the head!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

So this could get much more serious if they start clamping down on the comm tools we take for granted. Between this and the incoming sideloading block - all of a sudden the most paranoid fears of Stallman's don't seem nearly as far fetched.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Isn't ICE one of the biggest budget of the US now? How is that vulnerable?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Do we know yet that what ICE is doing even legal? (kidnapping, detaining, etc) I haven't followed closely enough to be sure of that. Does the actual police just sit by and watch?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] don@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

“Vulnerable” go fuck yourself with a white-hot steel dildo.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

Imagine having to warp reality THIS much, just to make it fit your twisted narrative?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Vulnerable my aunts fanny. They aggressively terrorize everywhere they go. Go everywhere armed to the teeth and are not in any way shape or form threatened with anything or anyone that could harm them sufficiently to put them into a threatened category. This is just google telling us whose side they are on

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 1 million dollar question: Would I be able to side load it with the new Google developer registration rules?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nope. Our tax dollars pay for their existence. They're not a vulnerable group, they're our employees.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›