Sounds good for the world. Curious to know what else is being captured.
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
604 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
59534 readers
3195 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yep, with Google it's 10% good and 90% evil profits.
"we can hide your leak for a modest subscription fee", probably
If it were Yelp putting out these maps, that would be their business model.
Let's not delude ourselves. Google is totally getting something out of this. Not sure if they just want some good press for a change or if it's something else though.
Was prob just built by a guy or small team that was given the freedom to build something in a month or two. Don't worry, though, they'll be laid off soon.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's 10% better than most though
The 10% is purely by chance
Collateral damage...
load more comments
(1 replies)
Don’t be evil more than 90% of the time.
ambiguous wording
at least 90% of the time, don't be evil
or
at least 10% of the time, don't be evil
Haha fair I meant the second one.
Fuck me, Google is doing something good.
They realized that biosphere collapse wouldn't be profitable in the long run.
They will fuck this up / drop it. History ensures this.
They remembered their old moto for a split second.
It's hard to trust in companies now. I bet the news in the following months is "Methane increasing green house gasses more than fossil fuel. Look at this colorful, interactive map from Google!"
But... Methane is fossil fuel?
Cane here to see how people were gonna spin this as a bad thing. Was not disappointed.
load more comments
(8 replies)
The supposition currently is Russia is a huge emitter, especially Siberia as the permafrost melts.
These positive feedback mechanisms are the sleeping giant.
It will be very useful to track this over time.
Siberia isn't the permafrost melting - those emissions correlate to known Oil and Gas Wells, that mostly have been just left open, so that they can be used easily again. Melting permafrost is still releasing relatively little.
I work in O&G and my own firm just spent the last three years hunting for and patching pipe leaks by looking for methane emissions.
This is something they've been crowing about for a while, but its been a problem for decades that only got treated as something worth fixing when the cost of aerial reconnaissance dropped. Its a classic negative externality that energy companies simply don't want to acknowledge until the price is right.
If you think this is the only case in which lax regulation has left the lid off Pandora's box, don't ask what was up with the BP oil rig explosion or look to hard into the number of gas leaks polluting the Mississippi river or... really... ask any questions at all about the state of safety and soundness of O&G infrastructure.
Yep...makes Synthetic fuels an even more no-brainer for me personally. Granted, it doesn't for those companies and lobbyists because it's going to be a lot more expensive initially, but if there's really a will to do something against climate change, the first thing to do should be taxing those companies doing this shit willfully and knowingly to hell and back. A few wind turbines with some electrolysis machines suddenly become a lot cheaper.
And it's a Win-Win for everyone - lots of people keep their jobs, execs keep getting money and I can keep driving ICE - and no extra co2, methan or other gasses are being released. And with these Satellites, there's actually a way to keep companies from being shit.
But that may very well be a bit too utopian...
Before you get excited, farts have on average about <0.01% methane. Its mostly hydrogen sulfide.
Party pooper
Just means I need to make more. I'm gonna get on the map, just you wait.
Finally some good news from Google!
Google detecting farts from space.
Adds your fart map to your monthly gmaps timeline!
I think aside from Cattle a large source of Methane Emissions would be Flare Stacks from Pumpjack Locations. Technically it's illegal to burn off the excess natural gas, but the punishment is a fine.
GIS nerds unite!
But seriously, great way to see the technology used and data distributed. One day I can only hope to grasp a more complete understanding of the software and how to apply it to do shit like this.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A satellite that measures methane leaks from oil and gas companies is set to start circulating the Earth 15 times a day next month.
The partnership between Google and the Environmental Defense Fund, which in March is expected to launch its satellite known as MethaneSAT, marks a new era of global climate accountability.
Scientists say slashing emissions is one of the fastest ways to slow the climate crisis because methane has 80 times the warming power of carbon dioxide over a decade.
"We think this information is incredibly valuable for energy companies, researchers, and the public sector to anticipate and mitigate methane emissions in components that are generally most susceptible," Maguire said.
The satellite launch comes as countries and oil and gas companies aim to drastically reduce methane emissions by 2030 to tackle the climate crisis.
During the UN climate summit in Dubai last year, companies accounting for 40% of global oil and gas production promised to nearly eliminate methane leaks from their own operations this decade.
The original article contains 736 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Reminder: "The Nord Stream gas leak emitted up to 500,000 tons of methane : NPR"
That written looks way more impressive than 0.5 Mega tons, or 0.0005Gt, which is how global emissions are often noted.
Now I'm curious how it ranks in scale with other emissions
The irony would be thick if this satellite were launched on a next-Gen methane fueled rocket.
(That is the trend now, kerosene and hydrogen are out, methane is in.)
Curious to see how this will flame the "China making up all the bad gases" data simplification while it will omit everything else in that regard as they won't be its business.
view more: next ›