this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
210 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new bill has been proposed in the US Senate that would permit artificial intelligence (AI) data center firms to bypass federal electricity regulations by building their own energy infrastructure.

The DATA Act of 2026 was proposed by Senator Tom Cotton (Republican, Arkansas) and would amend the Federal Power Act.

“American dominance in AI and other crucial emerging industries should not come at the expense of Arkansans paying higher energy costs,” Cotton said in a statement. “My bill will ensure that America can continue to lead in these spaces by eliminating outdated regulations.”

If passed the bill would create a new utility category called “consumer-regulated electric utilities” (CREUs), with companies who build their own independent power infrastructure falling under this new designation. In order to qualify for CREU, the utilities would have to be completed disconnected from the main grid and built solely to serve new electric loads. Consequently, if the utility subsequently connects to the grid it would lose its exempt status.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Unless they specify Solar, Wind, or Hydrogen, it's just going to be these assholes building their own coal generators FFS.

Big NOPE

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Honestly, if they made it a requirement that it has to be 100% clean energy, this could actually be a net positive, but of course they won't because it's Trump's admin and he's got a boner for coal and oil.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

~~boner~~ bribe

Fixed that for you

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Saw something about the EPA rolling back air quality regulations too

Good times

[–] miguel@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago

For perspective, the one they're proposing to build in southern NM has an estimated pollution output larger than the entire El Paso region. https://www.riograndesierraclub.org/project-jupiter/

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I dunno, at least some of planned datacenters ARE doing that. For example an absolutely ENORMOUS Solar Farm is being built in Cheyenne, Wyoming for another Microsoft DC. For a previous MS DC a big ass wind farm was built. Meta is building a fuck you sized DC in Cheyenne and recently inked a deal with Terrapower for a natrium powered reactor.

I dislike having to defend these assholes but the Green Energy thing has been done, is being done, and they have definite plans to do more of it.

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 weeks ago

Any available gas turbines are already being sucked up. Old commercial jet engines are a very popular choice right now.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Natural gas fuel cells were a pretty popular choice there for a while. Bloom energy has been marketing their shit towards datacenters for as long as I can remember, and as far as I know they use a similar mechanism to hydrogen fuel cells where you're just stripping electrons off of the methane molecules.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its still natural gas. Getting it out of the ground is an ecological disaster.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's also a byproduct of petroleum refinement and an even worse greenhouse gas than CO2, so breaking it down into CO2 and water is better than just releasing it. Might as well make some lemonade.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If passed the bill would create a new utility category called “consumer-regulated electric utilities” (CREUs), with companies who build their own independent power infrastructure falling under this new designation. In order to qualify for CREU, the utilities would have to be completed disconnected from the main grid and built solely to serve new electric loads.

A visual depiction of this bill from the perspective of someone from Arkansas.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

Democrats are far from perfect, but republicans never propose anything reasonable.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Meaning fuel powered generators? Bah.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Apparently they're looking at tying together hundreds of stand alone generators from Caterpillar.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

I also read an article on trying to reuse old jet engines too. They’re trying to get their hands on anything that can produce electricity.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eco-terrorism is making a comeback.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Long overdue but a welcomed return nonetheless.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Tom Cotton should be thrown into a live high voltage electrical grid

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"guys I've got some money coming my way, so here's a cool idea.."

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Rules for thee, not for me!

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn’t Texas try something like this?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I know the grid in Texas is (was?) separated from the main national grid, and I guess, maybe something like this could eventually lead to a state wide grid that's disconnected from the main grid, and maybe that's very much the long term intention and a real problem.

It would take awhile to manifest as a big issue though as at least the blurb indicates it has to be for newly built power plants and new loads.

If a data center wants to build their own offgrid power system though I don't see the harm in that? In the future they might very well be building SMR's to power only their facility.

I think it should all still be overseen by whatever existing regulations there are and kept to the same standards though. And maybe some rules about connecting them to other purpose built ones under this same grouping?

Like, Apple builds one, and then Google builds one. Google and Apple can't join together.

Maybe even limit it to some strict commercial type use, so Google can't be doing this to power a google city where residents live.

Edits: Clarity and thoughts along those lines.

Edit: Oh and it should be mandated to be green energy.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

This is pure greed in action

it should definitely be legal to hunt politicians for food.