this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
484 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

82855 readers
3776 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EDIT: This happened back in 2025. Will leave as I’m sure I’m not the only one that didn’t know, but I saw it on hacker news and didn’t realize it was a year old. My bad.

In an odd approach to trying to improve customer tech support, HP allegedly implemented mandatory, 15-minute wait times for people calling the vendor for help with their computers and printers in certain geographies.

Callers from the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Ireland, and Italy were met with the forced holding periods, The Register reported on Thursday. The publication cited internal communications it saw from February 18 that reportedly said the wait times aimed to “influence customers to increase their adoption of digital self-solve, as a faster way to address their support question. This involves inserting a message of high call volumes, to expect a delay in connecting to an agent and offering digital self-solve solutions as an alternative.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

HP is one of those companies whose products you can easily avoid. I don't understand their dominance in the printer market, or why people continue to buy their products when many of them are objectively poor. I also don't recall a time when HP had a particularly strong reputation to begin with.

At this point, most competitors offer better alternatives than HP.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

It's a known brand, that's the reason why people choose it.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, my current ISP has two choices on phone: 1 for contract stuff, 2 for technical support. 1 always has at least 5 minutes waiting time, while 2 usually has none. Choices were made.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 2 hours ago

On a new service I like to mash the # key a couple times. Sometimes it skips the options & puts me in a queue for generic customer support.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It's like a CEO heard a joke or saw a comic where this happened and thought it was the best idea possible. "If we add in waiting time for no reason then some of the people will hang up and go away." It's the same logic as making anyone who wants to close an account (such as Netflix) jump through 3 people and a million hoops.

Seriously, I moved to a town where Comcast has no Internet service, I looked it up on their online service tool. They STILL ran me through retention even after they looked it up and confirmed it internally, and I had to go through 10 extra minutes of some lady reading from a script before they'd kill my account, and then had the gall to ask if I wanted to complete a customer service survey.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Tell Comcast youre going to prison and wont be able to pay for their service

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 2 hours ago

I'll remember that for next time.

[–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Especially if you are planning to.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I completely stonewalled the comcast retention stuff and I think I cut the entire call down to 5 minutes once I had someone on the line. I almost felt bad because she was clearly new and had a trainer with her. I just kept saying 'just cancel the service' every attempt to ask me something was met with 'have you cancelled the service yet'

Lady I have anxiety about phone calls, I am not happy I have to make one. If I have to play this conversation through in my head 100 times then we're following one of the scripts I have ready, not comcast's.

I assume every large company and bank (big or small) does this kinda shit on the regular

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 95 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I self-solved my HP problems by never buying from HP again. I love my Brother printer. Don't any of you dare quote stories about Brother enshittifying stuff in the replies (I will cry).

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Brother has started selling printers that require an ink or toner subscription. I had to watch out for that last time I bought one.

Even if they get worse, I'm sure another brand will take their place.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For me the solution is simply to just not own a printer. I can count on one hand the number of times I've had to print something in the last year. Anyway that's what parents are for, their house is where you store things you only occasionally want.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

But doctor... I am the parent.

Seriously, half the stuff that we print is coloring pages.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Even if they did it’s nowhere near the level of HP

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck these companies that refuse to provide customer support and try to force us on inadequate bullshit llm answers, if I didn't want a solution I would use them.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

One of the first things I do now before buying off a new site is see if they have anything resembling customer service and support policies.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 31 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, because the #1 thing everyone wants to hear over and over is a voice saying "go to double u double u double u dot..."

This is the fucking 21st century if they could fix their shit on the internet they would have already done it.

Especially pisses me off when the only reason you're calling them is because their website /portal / app explicitly went "you can't do that here, call us"

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Even better than that is Siteground's absolutely abysmal support system.

In order to access support they force you to type your question into their chatbot first. This is not optional. It's the only way to get support.

Fools that we are, we actually tried the solution the chatbot offered. This resulted in a good amount of time wasted looking for settings that didn't exist, because the solution was total bullshit. They claim they've customized this thing to give helpful outputs, but it's clearly just ChatGPT with a custom prompt.

When we finally spoke to an agent I pointed this out and they responded with the stock "You should always double check the output of AI" line.

DOUBLE CHECK WITH WHOM, YOU MOUTH BREATHING MORON? THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL FUCKING SUPPORT CHANNEL. YOU LITERALLY DIDN'T GIVE ME ACCESS TO ANY OTHER KIND OF SUPPORT UNTIL I USED THE CHATBOT FIRST, SO WHERE IN THE ACTUAL FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO DOUBLE CHECK THE OUTPUT?

Is it with a customer service agent? Is that what you're saying?! That I should ignore whatever it tells me, wait until I can talk to a representative and then do whatever they say instead? Because if that's the case, WHY IN THE FUCK ARE YOU FORCING EVERYONE TO TALK TO THE BOT FIRST??!!!

Absolutely fucking asinine idiocy. Anyway, don't use Siteground, they fucking suck.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You shouldn't talk to customer support agents like that. They're not responsible for the actions of the shitty company, and you are giving them a bad day for no reason.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 hours ago

Jesus fucking Christ.

OK little Timmy, today we're going to learn that sometimes people express things in their "inner voice", but they don't share those things in their "outer voice".

And sometimes, later, they might share those "inner voice" thoughts with other people in an environment where it's safe to do. But it doesn't mean they have to express those inner voice thoughts to the person that they were thinking them about?

Does that help you understand better? Would youv maybe like a juice box and a lie down to think about it?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah ran into that a month or so back with some service or other. Account was locked out, I told the prompt I was looking for an account unlock, I got to listen to “you can do most things by logging into your account at” for 45 minutes.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

Online banking does this all of the time. It's surprising how little you can actually do on their app, virtually every common banking task requires you to call them.

I had to call them to set up an automatic payment on my credit card from my savings account. Because I couldn't work out how to do it on the app. I confirmed with the support agent that you can't do it on the app.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I have found that if I yell or sound angry at the LLM prompt, I'll get an agent faster than if I am a proper adult

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you swear or use certain words/phrases/tones there are absolutely some that put you into a higher priority queue. There are also some that immediately kick you into that queue the moment you swear, bypassing any info gathering and such.

I’ve had to use it for things like Verizon which absolutely expects the LLM to be able to verify your account, but their account verification was broken. Swear at it a little and suddenly the account verification is no longer needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Could be worse: You could be made to sit through aich tee tee pee colon slash slash double u double u double u dot...

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

"influence customers to increase their adoption of digital self-solve"

Corporate speakers should be paddled

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago

Translation: "We've had our fill of screwing you around for today and invite you to cordially go screw yourself."

When it comes to HP, just say no.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great way to increase their adoption of a competitor’s product

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 15 hours ago

They have paid good money to lawmakers to make sure that brother is never widely adopted.

[–] Crookclaw@lemmy.world 78 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

While hilarious, that's more than a year old...

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well shit. I saw it on hacker news and thought it was recent.

My bad for not paying attention.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

To be fair, if you got on hold with HP support on the day the article was published, you'd still be onhold today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 43 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I did tier 1, 2, and eventually some 3 support back in the day for a software company. I liked how they handled it.

Customer called in, reached a live person doing intake. The intake person noted their question and callback number, helping to scope the problem if needed, and entered a ticket into the queue. The intake person gave the caller an expected wait time for a support tech to call back, pointed them to online written help documentation, and ended the call. Then push the ticket to tier 1, 2, 3, or "urgent, need to call NOW" queues. Depending on tier and call volume and time of day, they'd get a callback from a tech anywhere from immediately to the next morning.

Support techs like myself were coached to help over the phone, but also to point out the written materials and encourage their use. I would commonly say, "sure, that's a problem we can fix, go ahead and go to screen x, click on button y, etc. By the way, you're not the only one who had had this question, we even have an entry on this in our support documentation. Let me show you where you it's at so you can get to the fix even faster than a phone call next time".

Having the intake person take numbers, then techs call back later saved customers from having to wait on hold for lengths of time. We had very few cases of irate customers stuck waiting.

My shittiest experiences are the companies that don't do any intake and make all tiers of calls wait on hold in the same queue. Luck of the draw if the tech you end up with is a tier 1 still in training pants or a tier 3 pissed to be walking a customer thru updating their password for the millionth tim.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 29 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like a lot of companies don't do things the good way not because the good way is hard, or the bad way is cheaper, but because management is stupid. Stupid or sometimes apathetic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (9 children)

Having run a couple support teams, I get where they’re coming from with the wait time.

Every minute my team wasn’t spending helping customers was spent updating the knowledge base. We invested a ton of effort into it, and 90% of the tickets were answerable in the first interaction with a simple search.

But getting people to actually read the docs was impossible. And maybe if we made them wait they’d get frustrated

But that’s not very nice to your customers or the agents.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

When I started at one company I put together a text file with all the different sources of info I found in training. By the end of training I had turned it into an HTML file. Years later we got bought out. Support from corporate disappeared on legacy customs who hadn't moved over to new stuff.

A coworker tapped me on the shoulder "If I were to make a local network web server on one of these computers could I upload your help system to it for everyone to use?"

Next thing you know I'm the default source for all information on every system that has ever existed. Prior to that everyone knew that I had it all in my brain but only a handful of people knew that I also had it all in HTML.

TL;DR I built a pirate help desk knowledge base.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I'm currently struggling with a product that I'd love to use the knowledge base for help but they keep changing their goddamn gui every version so the knowledge base docs never apply to me. "Click on files->database->security", uhhh, there is no "security" under "database" you mother f'ers...

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I spent a couple of years doing phone support (for a Windows program, in the internet-by-modem days), and we had a paper manual that we spent a lot of effort on. I'm not sure it helped too many people. We didn't have a way of measuring, though. We had no idea how many people were blundering through things on their own, how many people set things up on their own with the manual's help, or how many people were chucking the whole product in a closet and forgetting about it.

Sure, some callers definitely felt it was a waste of time to learn how to work things; they just wanted their things to work. They wanted their things to serve them, instead of the other way around, and I can't even argue with that philosophy.

But most callers just didn't have the technical experience to make sense of any documentation we could write. Some didn't know what the desktop computer they used every day even looked like, didn't know which of the metal-and-plastic boxes around their desk was "the computer." They didn't know the difference between a floppy drive and a hard drive, and they'd argue with us about it. "I don't have a floppy drive, my drive takes those hard disks." No manual or knowledge base article was going to help these folks, no matter how much effort we made.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

"an odd approach"

Otherwise known as lying.

[–] khendron@lemmy.ca 24 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody hates their customers like HP hates their customers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Renorc@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Top three work PCs for my work are Dell, Lenovo, and HP. I didn’t even consider HP on the last purchase. Not that the others options are great but never HP.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I've been twitchy about Lenova since they got caught selling computers with a rootkit that reinstalled crap-ware that users had uninstalled. A user would uninstall useless software from their computer, and when they rebooted, the rootkit would kick in and reinstall the bloatware.

The "rootkit"-style covert installer, dubbed the Lenovo Service Engine (LSE), works by installing an additional program that updates drivers, firmware, and other pre-installed apps. The engine also "sends non-personally identifiable system data to Lenovo servers," according to the company. The engine, which resides in the computer's BIOS, replaces a core Windows system file with its own, allowing files to be downloaded once the device is connected to the internet.

But that service engine also put users at risk.

In a July 31 security bulletin, the company warned the engine could be exploited by hackers to install malware. The company issued a security update that removed the engine's functionality, but users must install the patch manually.

They had previously been caught selling computers with adware installed on them.

Earlier this year, the computer maker was forced to admit it had installed Superfish adware over a three-month period on new machines sold through retail channels. The adware had the capability to intercept and hijack internet traffic flowing over secure connections, including online stores, banks, among others.

Users were told they should "not use their laptop for any kind of secure transactions until they are able to confirm [the adware] has been removed," security researcher Marc Rogers told ZDNet at the time.

It was thought as many as 16 million consumers and bring-your-own-device users were affected by the preinstalled adware.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

since they got caught selling computers with a rootkit

Is there any large computer/phone vendor that didn't? Tuxedo maybe, but they aren't large.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

HP is a garbage company. My laptops typically last until the hardware is well past obsolete, but not HP's crap. My HP X360 laptop's motherboard failed completely and the hinges just fell apart for the 2nd time. This POS didn't last for 3 years of occasional use. Never again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@piefed.social 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's never "high call volume". It's always "not enough customer service representatives".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›