this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
364 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

21101 readers
719 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd like to note that this is the third cromulent Simpsons reference in this thread. Pretty good for a show with only 11 seasons.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Pretty good for a show with only 11 seasons.

Anyone who measures their age by Simpsons seasons will sadly not have sufficient suspension of disbelief for that.

I can only remember 11 or so, sure. But I know there's like 35.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, no it's reality that's wrong. Only 11

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

And that's why I started smoking again.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

BIG TOBACCO will do anything to get kids hooked on cigarettes smh.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

is this unusual for real botany? in the incredible open source multiplayer game Space Station 14, this is practically a basic job function for botanists!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what scale would be required...

But absolutely wild they're starting with one of the most labor intensive crops.

Tomatoes are the same family, and waaaaay easier to grow at scale. Seems like it would have been an obvious choice.

But if an acre is an annual supply, it doesn't matter.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They used an Australian wild tobacco that is widely used in genetic research, so not the American domesticated tobacco https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotiana_benthamiana

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Still tho...

It's the same process to harvest leaves.

I grew up on a tobacco farm, hardly any aspect is mechanized.

To harvest it:

  1. Put a six foot stick in the ground

  2. Put a metal spear tip on top.

  3. Cut plant with hatchet

  4. Impale on stick

After like 6-8 plants, start a new stick.

Then after a couple weeks load it on a wagon by hand, then hang it in a tobacco barn (aka death trap) where you're a couple stories high doing the splits, and people pass the sticks up to you and you hang and spread them to dry.

Months later you climb back up and bring it all down.

Then manually remove each and every single leaf.

Grade it.

And compress it into bales using hydraulic jacks.

For tomatoes:

  1. Drive a tractor over the field

  2. Dump tomatoes

Like...

I'm just saying if we need a lot, this is t the means for production. If it's just testing and it'll end up somewhere else, no worries.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 days ago

I appreciate when people have RL experience in a niche topic. Best part of online discussions, thank you for the insight!

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, this is basic research, which generally starts with common model organisms that many labs have access to. This increases reproducibility of the early results. The study mentions expression of the relevant genes and proteins in the buds as well, and also calls out one of the pathways in tomato, so perhaps the next step could be to test it in other nightshades and their fruit

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, was just surprised tobacco is a common base for experiments.

And that explains why it's used here, it's never going to be at scale

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

Tobacco industry funded a huge amount of molecular biology in transgenic tobacco and it ended up being a well understood plant model system to express anything.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

Lol. They aren't currently doing it for large scale production.

They also claim that while they could do it, they haven't modified the plants to make it where their seeds will produce the drugs. Only the current modified plant.

They also said the could just as easily do this to tomato, corn, or potato.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 days ago

Fuck yeah! Science!

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

With the addition of nine genes, the plants were able to produce psilocin and psilocybin, usually found in mushrooms; DMT from various plants; and bufotenin and 5-methoxy-DMT, compounds secreted by the Colorado river toad (Incilius alvarius).

Plants could easily be altered permanently with changes that become inheritable, but doing so could be problematic, given that the compounds produced are commonly used as recreational drugs, says Aharoni. “It’s a little bit tricky if we have it inherited, and then people will ask for seeds,” he says. “We can do it also in tomato, potato, corn.”

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago

“It’s a little bit tricky if we have it inherited, and then people will ask for seeds,” he says. “We can do it also in tomato, potato, corn.”

LMAO this dude is a natural salesman

[–] HelluvaKick@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Psilocybin potatoes, please

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Trippy tomatoes, Cosmic corn

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

thc succatash please.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 14 points 2 days ago

Is no one paying attention to the date on the article??

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Tell me more

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Since I am paywallwd a) is it BS b) what compounds?

I am knowledgeable in ethnobotany and psychedelics and I cannot see what this might produce other than nausea and delirium.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a) is it BS

The tobacco plant is a model plant, the go-to for genetic engineering experiments. So often when scientists want to test creating a bio-factory, they will try to modify a tobacco plant.

I am knowledgeable in ethnobotany and psychedelics and I cannot see what this might produce other than nausea and delirium.

The idea is not to smoke the resulting tobacco plant with some funky mix of psychedelics. But to extract and purify the compounds from the bio-factory. Resulting in a better production chain than however the compounds are typically made today.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The idea is not to smoke the resulting[...]

Well that's just no fun

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's a lazy "paywall".

Genetically engineering tobacco plants could enable a more sustainable production method for psychedelic drugs, which are increasingly in demand for research and medical uses.

With the addition of nine genes, the plants were able to produce psilocin and psilocybin, usually found in mushrooms; DMT from various plants; and bufotenin and 5-methoxy-DMT, compounds secreted by the Colorado river toad (Incilius alvarius).

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

DMT is smokeable so what a crime against humanity to not open source this. Thx to all the posters of the articles

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, that's cool and good. Sad LSD wasn't one of them though

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

One of my favourites!

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh shit would that mean dmt could become cheaper?

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The opposite. Now that they have a patent and marketable process, they will lobby to increase enforcement [of the current, natural method] and, therefore, make it harder and more expensive to acquire elsewhere other than their highly proprietary (and likely excessively expensive) sources.

[Edit]

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tobacco plant altered to produce five psychedelic drugs

Genetically engineering tobacco plants could enable a more sustainable production method for psychedelic drugs, which are increasingly in demand for research and medical uses

Scientists have engineered tobacco plants to produce five powerful psychedelic compounds normally found in other plants, fungi and animals in a single crop. They argue that using plants to manufacture the drugs would be simpler and more sustainable than existing processes, making research into therapeutic uses and production of future medicines easier.

Asaph Aharoni at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and his colleagues modified Nicotiana benthamiana plants using a technique called agroinfiltration, which involves using a bacterium to introduce genes from other organisms into a plant. The modified plant then makes the proteins encoded by those genes, but the DNA isn’t incorporated into the plant’s genome, so the effect is short-lived.

With the addition of nine genes, the plants were able to produce psilocin and psilocybin, usually found in mushrooms; DMT from various plants; and bufotenin and 5-methoxy-DMT, compounds secreted by the Colorado river toad (Incilius alvarius).

Plants could easily be altered permanently with changes that become inheritable, but doing so could be problematic, given that the compounds produced are commonly used as recreational drugs, says Aharoni. “It’s a little bit tricky if we have it inherited, and then people will ask for seeds,” he says. “We can do it also in tomato, potato, corn.”

The medical uses of psychedelic compounds are becoming more popular and better understood, says Aharoni, but harvesting them from natural sources risks populations threatened by habitat loss and overexploitation. The drugs are chemically synthesised for use in research, but producing them in tobacco plants, which are easily cultivated in greenhouses, would be much simpler.

The idea of growing drugs through pharmaceutical farming, or “pharming”, certainly isn’t new. Plant-produced protein drugs have been approved in the US since 2012, and as far back as 2002, maize has been modified to produce a pharmaceutical protein. Another research team used tobacco plants in 2022 to synthesise cocaine, discovering that it could produce about 400 nanograms of cocaine per milligram of dried leaf – about a 25th of the level in a coca plant.

Rupert Fray at the University of Nottingham, UK, says around 25 per cent of prescription drugs are derived wholly or partially from plants, and there are massive opportunities to create “green factories” that can grow new compounds in greenhouses.

“If you want to understand something, you’ve got to be able to build something, so showing that you can make it in tobacco plants is useful,” says Fray. “As a technical accomplishment, to show that you understand the pathways and can do it, I think it has value.”

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeb3034

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Israel. I wonder if the intent is to use psychoactive substances as chemical weapons?

Interesting result regardless.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

it's not about selling it as a product. it's about determining what molecular pathways are interchangeable between plants, fungus and animals.

load more comments (1 replies)

"Is that wacky tobaccy?" "The wackiest!"

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

This is some Space Station 13 botany

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Tobacco? More like whoa-bacco

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

it's called tomacco, I need some seeds

That one I know how to do. Swap the roots of tobacco and tomato. Then you end up with nicotine free tobacco and nicotine producing tomatoes

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Now that’s what I call a good reason to start smoking again.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

So, can it produce opiates like morphine?

load more comments
view more: next ›