this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
355 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84199 readers
4276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I love how corpos can just change the rules at will.

Edit: New prices:

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/models-and-pricing

And if you look at the old pricing structure, some of the models are increasing by 27x

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I could be really cruel right now, I could point out to people how this is chickens coming home to roost, how it's always been grossly subsidized and underpriced, how the game was always getting users, companies, the country, the whole damn world hooked on these slop machines and then once they're reliant on them to jack up the price hugely. I could be really mean about this, I could lord it over people, I could point out how they've been dupes this whole time and in the process traitors to all of humanity.

I could. i think I will.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

New meme dropping: "telling you I told you so? Yes, I think I will"

[–] hoboshrimp@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

People like you act like local models don’t exist. Anyone relying purely on a single cloud hosted model for their work is an idiot.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I literally just signed up for the $10/month plan... Guess ill just run my own git server.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Git? Forgejo is really nice.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Im just familiar with git.

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 10 points 8 hours ago

Forgejo is a git server.

UI looks very similar to older GitHub before it got so "modern" in a bad way.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Check it out, it's pretty sweet

https://forgejo.org/

Basically selfhostable github.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Gotcha, ill give it a go. Thanks

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What does having a git server have to do with copilot subscriptions?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Moving local to not support githib, I eun Open Claw local too

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

"AI Credit"

fuck !!!

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

How else are they going to begin to recap their billions and billions of debt? Someone has to pay for all those data centres, all that hardware, all that power, etc etc etc. It will be the companies that have come to rely on AI.

Sure, for now, AI is a lot cheaper than an intern, but it doesn't become an expert like a human does. And Amazon used to be cheaper than other retailers right up until they had achieved vast market share.

This cannot be the last 10x price multiplier they pull. Not even close. Firstly they're way, way, way off from recouping their costs, and secondly, they're still way, way off market value for an incompetent human intern who isn't learning much.

Uber didn't enter the market to open up taxis to new drivers and bring down prices, that was marketing. They entered the market to take a cut out of ever taxi fare in the world, and drive up prices at peak times to many times the agreed fares, especially in regulated areas.

Similarly, AI didn't enter the coding market to drive down prices and enable greater access for folk to generate code. They entered the coding market to receive the wages of programmers and drive up prices in in-demand fields. They are not unaware of how much companies pay devs. Why else would they have spent all those billions in advance? Where is the payback coming from?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So, if you subscribe to the $10/ month plan you get $10 worth of tokens to use within a month, and if you subscribe to the $49/month plan you get $49 worth of tokens to use within a month.

At this point why subscribe? Just pay directly the tokens so if you use less you pay less.

To me it doesn't make sense to subscribe at $49 and maybe use $30 of tokens.

People were subscribing at the $49 plan because they were using $1000 in tokens worth

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

People were subscribing at the $49 plan because they were using $1000 in tokens worth

Companies were just eating that $951/mo loss so they could gain market share by burning their nearly endless pile of capital.

Now were on the cusp of the bubble bursting so the dominant players are now trying to extract revenue via rapid enshittification.

It's not price fixing, that would be illegal, it just so happens that they're all changing their business model at the same time. If they were doing illegal things there would be an investigation.

In completely unrelated news, didn't you see the nice ballroom plans?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

👉 💥 💥 GET DOWN DID SOMEONE SAY BALLROOM

[–] halfdane@piefed.social 129 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, if AI gets too expensive, companies can always hire juniors to replace them 🤣

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the junior devs get too expensive they can outsource all of their software development to Bangladesh

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When offshore-sourced code gets too shitty they can hire some senior engineers to rebuild it in a way that's compatible with the rest of their ecosystem.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

Which brings the model back to AI. All businesses have accomplished was basically add an extra step in actually forcing themselves to pay for what they actually need every so often. Instead of Sr>jr>offshore>sr. they now just added in AI to the loop.

Not that charlatans care, as long as they get theirs in the interim.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just as open weight models are getting good. Qwen 3.6 27B just dropped with claimed performance approaching Opus 4.6, but it can run on a Mac with a M-series SoC. I tested it out today on a M4 Pro with Ollama and Cline and was impressed with its reasoning, but it was slow. Going to try with llama.cpp tomorrow and mess around tweaking it for speed.

https://ai.rs/ai-developer/qwen-3-6-27b-local-coding-model

AI coding agents are useful, but it’s time for the cloud-based models to chill out so we can get cheap RAM again to run our shit locally.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's almost like buying all the RAM so most people can only afford subscription services is the point.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Think of it like a happy little coincidence

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 17 points 23 hours ago
[–] alpha1beta@piefed.social 8 points 20 hours ago

We're not solidly into the enshitification stage of the AI bubble. But unlike most things, it's never created value and only drains revenue.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Users on annual Pro or Pro+ plans will remain on their existing plan with premium request-based pricing until their plan expires, however, model multipliers will increase on June 1 (see table).

holy shit, 9x the previous cost. which was already not great. I was on the fence about cancelling it, but thanks for making up my mind, MS

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love that their email made it sound like it was a wash, like "we're just changing our billing model, you'll get credits now, samesies!" but then this pricing chart buried 3-levels down from the announcement lays out just how much less you're going to get for the same price.

I wonder about all the startups who were bragging about their $10k/month AI coding bills being the best money they ever spent. When this new pricing kicks in and pushes it to $40k/month right around the time all the vibe-coded shit blows up their codebase, I wonder if they'll still be so happy with their choices.

I interviewed for a place a while back and started asking about quality and velocity and how they balance it with AI developer tools, he said something like "One of our developers closed 400 PRs last month" and I instantly knew it was definitely not the place for me.

I wonder about all the startups who were bragging about their $10k/month AI coding bills being the best money they ever spent.

WTF did they think was going to happen?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's been their business model for a while now. "Here's something you also didn't ask for"

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is a crime, by the way, when you sell it together with a product you hold a monopoly for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce)

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but on the other hand look at the ballroom they've donated to (for completely non-corrupt reasons).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gonna be hilarious when the people who haven't been paying attention realize that they just replaced workers with shit that doesn't work AND actually costs more.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Yep, I've been telling anyone who'll listen that if you really want to drop juniors and give tools to seniors, then you have to pay the monthly cost (whatever it will be) and you have to be ready to foot the big bill in 5 years when your seniors (with no candidate replacements) say they'll take a 50% raise or walk.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 86 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Tale as old as time. Corpos try to get you dependent and then give your business an atomic wedgie.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The good news is that none of the companies pushing these products have created the dependency yet, and they are running out of venture capital almost too fast to have the option.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, they couldn't have communicated this more confusingly, if they tried.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That was intentional. They were trying to word the announcement to not make it sound like you're now getting 1/5-1/9 as much AI for the same price.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I imagine that they did try. But it's not just the intentionally misleading announcement post, they also have 5(?) different subscription tiers, which get different changes from this. And one of the subscription tiers is actually called "Pro+", so that does not mean "Pro and more expensive tiers" like I wondered. And they have this ridiculous intermediate currency to make things even more confusing.

Their offering itself is overly complex and confusing...

[–] ID10T@programming.dev 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The whole “AI Credit” thing did strike me as odd to even introduce. They mention a few times that 1 AI Credit = $0.01, but then do the whole pricing table in $/1M tokens.

The only place I saw them even use “AI Credits” as a unit was to say the $10/month plan includes 1000 AI Credits. Why even introduce a whole new unit if you only use it to say your $10 monthly plan includes $10 of usage?

I suspect the answer is so that they can later muddy the waters by changing the number of included credits to be less than you’re paying monthly without directly saying “you’re now paying $20/month for $10 of usage”

I guess it is coming from the same people who came up with the world’s most inscrutable billing scheme for compute…

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean, even then, they could increase the price per token, if they want to hand out fewer tokens for the price paid.

They could make this work like a prepaid SIM card, where you charge it with e.g. $10 and then you can use it until the $10 are used up.
Instead, they make it work like in-game currencies in scammy free-to-play games. Except that they didn't choose a confusing conversion rate, for some reason...

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

This is the right way to go. This will incentivize many companies to rethink their strategy, and slow down or scale down AI adoption. After that and the revenue drops for many AI companies, they will back off purchasing all possible RAM and storage in existence which will drive down pricing. And when the prices get to normal again, we will simply buy more RAM for our local machines and run free models.

This news kinda makes me happy. Shit's starting to fall apart. Finally.

[–] civ@lemmy.civl.cc 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Getting de-skilled is starting to look like a very expensive gamble and this is just the first price hike, expect more to come. And expect them to criminalize open source models as well with some national security concerns or something.

load more comments
view more: next ›