this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
197 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
3607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

Have to love the narrative spin, they are placing a post limit on free accounts; as far as I'm aware, 'verified' accounts are just paid accounts now, right?

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean twitter, the neo-nazi pedo shithole?

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

It’s called Xitter now. Pronounced with sh.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 93 points 2 days ago (6 children)

You got to be out of your mind to reach those limits on any social media platform.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 45 points 2 days ago

We're talking about twitter... People are usually out of their mind over there...

[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Back when I used Twitter, that was totally possible. Even without being totally insane. In some areas Twitter did work like a giant unorganized chat room. You were able to discuss the current soccer games. Or current events. Breaking news. The local elections. I totally did write more than 50 tweets back in 2016 in the election night when Trump was elected or during the soccer world cups

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I totally did write more than 50 tweets back in 2016 in the election night when Trump was elected or during the soccer world cups

That is exactly the kind of insanity I'm refering to.

[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I mean ... you've written 1100 comments here on Lemmy in three months. So ... welcome to the asylum?

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago

You don't understand! Someone doing that on some other social media platform is bad and insane! Him doing that on this social media platform is good and based! Jesus Christ, it's a simple concept!

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That averages to 12 comments and half a post a day.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You know how averages work, right?

Honestly, someone who posts everyday averaging 12 comments is probably crazier than the occasional poster who very occasionally hits ~~50~~ 200 in a day.

Edit: I misread the limits as being 50 comments, which I stand by as not too crazy now and again. 200 comments/replies even on the most newsworthy days is certainly getting to the ‘difficult to do’ level. I’ll grant you that I’d be hard pressed to get to 200 even if I tried. I consider myself on your side on this one. I’ll only say that citing any average usage per day is unimportant, because there are no limits on the average daily usage, only absolute upper limits.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're free to think that way. It, however, is in no way in conflict with what I originally said, and thus isn't the self-own you think it is.

I said very clearly that I view 50 posts and/or 200 comments a day as insanity. To act as if 1200 comments in 100 days - which averages to 12 comments a day - is somehow equivalent is pretty disingenuous.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

TBF some local media is still on there, the only guy who covers city council meetings for Oakland (nearly 1/2 a million people), and he does it by live tweating the whole meeting, easily over 50 a day.

[–] skribe@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, nah. Live tooting an event it would be easy to exceed those numbers. Used to do it all the time, back in the day.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You clearly haven't seen cult leader Eliezer Yudkowsky's Twitter history.

[–] PostaL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Or cult leader Donald Trump

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 0 points 2 days ago

You got to be out of your mind to be on Xitter at all.

[–] mokey@therock.fraggle-rock.org 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Habibi, if you need to post more than 50 times a day on X you have a larger problem.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know who or what a Habibi is but as others have mentioned, live tweeting an event will easily get you past that limit

On the other hand, not livetweeting an event saves you both money and a lot of effort.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

50 posts a day should be a premium feature. That alone is kinda ridiculous.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 22 hours ago

50 posts a day should trigger red flag laws and a mental health councillor knocking on your door.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Oh no, this will affect my 0 posts per day i make there though.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago
[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Who tf gives a frogs fat ass?

Fuck X (Meta and TikTok), anyone who's still on any of these platform can fuck off anyway.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Furries likely would give a frog a fat ass. And it would be more enjoyable then anything on twitter.

[–] liinux@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago
[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've heard of furries. I've heard of scalies. What would you call a frog person? A slimy?

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

With the hard 'y' ? That's their word

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"People still using X".

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It’s crazy but understandable that media outlets started calling Twitter “X”. It’s batshit bonkers that they’re calling fleeced users “verified”, as if the word didn’t have prior meaning and it isn’t still widely used to this day (and long into the future)

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Regrettably, I accidentally implied that the linked slop generator is a media outlet. Point still stands though.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys are still talking about Xitter?

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

My first thought as well, didn't everyone leave that place years ago?

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

During my first year of college, I had a writing class. The professor made us join this new micro-blog platform. I tweeted a few times, which were part of some of the assignments. I thought the idea of <140 characters to be interesting. Paying for that sounds hilarious.

I’ll just leave this here, from The New Yorker, titled “L.P.D.: Libertarian Police Department”

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they ruined Twitter the moment they added images, and then it got worse with videos, the 2018 algorithm switch, and long tweets.

when your app is an everything app it's a nothing app

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

when your app is an everything app it's a nothing app

Such a perfect way to describe it!

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

Twitter was always about limiting yourself, originally to posts about as long as a text. That was kinda the point. They increased the post length a while ago, but as a long time fan of long form forum conversations, I never saw much point in Twitter. Then this crazy nutjob bought it and it appealed to me even less. Still, these limits seem reasonable as he paid so much for it and it hasn't made him a profit. So yeah, I think anyone who wants to use it more than that should maybe pay... or find another service to post on.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Maybe this will push people to quit, finally. Or to subscribe. I don't know, I used Twitter a tiny bit back the day, but I left and never looked back when Elon bought it. Just like when Reddit dropped their API support. Recognize when a platform is trying to enshittify and get out because you're the product, not the customer being served.