this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
141 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

84769 readers
3607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I got to ride in a Li Auotmotive i9 Ultra the other day and it was amazing. Ridiculously luxurious and far ahead of tesla. Cheaper too. It had a fridge and microwave, and big screens everywhere. Its Lidar view of everything around the car was vastly superior to Tesla's, and it has about 15x the computing power of my model 3.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

No, our answer is that EVs are dumb and that oil is the only energy source that matters in this century and every century to come.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The headline suggests it’s a problem that the USA is working on. Evidence suggests that in fact the approach being taken is to imitate an ostrich, and bury the collective head in oil and gas money.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

While the government might be doing that, the US auto manufactures are taking a different approach. GM makes some nice EVs.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Genuinely, have they? All the EV news I hear from the US is projects stalling or getting cancelled.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 4 points 7 hours ago

Those are what make the news. GM has a lot of EVs that look just like the ICE of the same name and they don't get much news.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The Ford Mustan Mach-E seems very nice as well

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a better plan that what Europe is doing. Laxing Chinese imports and Chinese owned factories on EU soil while also opening more doors for more "Overseas Police Service Stations" that everyone apparently forgot about.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a better idea?

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've been Flintstoning it for years, best move I ever made.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

While your idea is very good and I support it, that's a "ban smoking" solution to "how do we stop vaper imports from China"

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 60 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is what happens when you let the oil industry and their lobbyists have unfettered control of the narrative and legislation .You get a huge number of politicians falling into their pockets, and progress is stymied at every turn.

It's actually kind of surprising America has made the limited progress on EVs that we have. But it's nowhere near enough. And now we are paying the piper.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

American voters are doing their part to "help," crying about "high" fuel prices (less than half of what they are here) when one of the big issues is that undertaxation of petrol has led to underinvestment in alternatives.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This has very little to do with oil industry lobbyists, and a whole lot to do with the whole world outsourcing their production and labor to a country with no worker protections.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That would explain Chinese dominance in vehicles in general, not EVs in particular.

Also, Chinese EV manufacturing facilities are so efficient precisely because they're so incredibly highly automated, nothing to do with worker rights regardless of your opinion of China.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

That would explain Chinese dominance in vehicles in general, not EVs in particular.

Do ya see a bunch of Chinese ICE vehicles running around?

Also, Chinese EV manufacturing facilities are so efficient precisely because they're so incredibly highly automated

They're efficient because they have no concept of workers' rights or IP. Not because they're a country full of geniuses, and not because Big Oil is keeping them down, regardless of your opinion on China.

There are plenty of Chinese ICE vehicles, what on earth are you talking about ? MG got rolling here in the UK with ICE before releasing hybrids and EVs, Chery only have ICE and hybrids here etc etc Same in Australia with BYD and the rest.

You're poorly informed.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, you're just a propagandized westerner who hasn't done the most cursory research on the degree of automation in Chinese EV industry. Enjoy malding in your ignorance while your country's industry crashes and burns

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

The degree of automation is not relevant to a discussion about why they're being kept out of other countries, or anything to do with Big Oil.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That China has terrible workers rights is a fact. That China also has a lot of automation is an unrelated fact that is also true.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Automation is unrelated to EV price?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Its unrelated to a conversation about the oil industry and lobbyists, obviously, yes.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

Mostly. Price is a complex problem. Cost is a floor factor and automation affects that somehow. It is hard to know when automation lower prices as this depends on relative labor costs which have been going up in China.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The answer continues to be: do everything it can to ignore China exists, and insulate the industry from having to compete.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

How very free market of them. Seems like it would be so shitty to be a real republican - their party has totally abandoned those ideals.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I want those Chinese EVs so bad 😭

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Make decent vehicles that don't spy on people or track them.....fucking morons

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 12 hours ago

I'm sure his answer will be tariffs because he's not about to invade China for their oil.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Of course they “have an answer to EVs”. It’s to crush them or make them so outrageously expensive only the very wealthy will afford them.

And you know why? Because that’s how we voted.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.radio 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's kind of 30th trimester. Too late for abortion Steve - China domnitates and we have no answer

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 4 points 10 hours ago

The USA isn't exactly known for their cars. But even Germany has trouble making good cars nowadays.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Of course they do:

  1. Ban Chinese cars period
  2. Add an additional $130/year tax on EVs, in case one of those heathen cars actually gets sold here
  3. Ignore the rest of the world and taut how well the US makers are doing in the US
  4. ???
  5. Profit
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Are owners want us to use oil

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

And it never will!

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

The US has actively worked against EVs for over 100 years….

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

The US admin keeps telling people they want noise and emissions and doubling down on it. Make it make sense.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

Grey now? No more orange? :-(

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't see what that answer could be even hypothetically and if Trump wasn't a moron.
USA is not the world leader in production anymore, that ship has sailed. Now China is the leader in production, and USA is mostly a service based economy.
So cars isn't even the major problem, technology is.
Before the Japanese entered the market, and put a serious dent in US car manufacturing, American automakers were the biggest in the world, now the biggest American car manufacturer is GM at no. 5 internationally down from no. 4 in 2024.
Most likely USA will decline further because of the Chinese makers, that have not entered top 5 on production yet, but almost definitely will very soon.

USA is still significant with Ford following directly after GM. But the current home market GM and Ford are operating in, could make it even harder for them to compete internationally, as USA is somewhat held out of international trade by the Trump Tariffs, and those tariffs make production in USA more expensive.

So international competition by GM and Ford will be from factories outside of USA. But still disadvantaged because they can't make international deals to cover all their factories.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 9 hours ago

Be careful of those numbers - while the US isn't world leader in production, the US has continuously gone up in production, just that others have gone up even more. You don't see this because employment in manufacturing is way down, but production is still up. It no longer looks like we make anything, but the numbers show we make more than when we were world leaders.